THE STUDY ABOUT THE MARGINAL FIT OF THE CASTING TITANIUM AND MACHINE-MILLED TITANIUM COPINGS

주조티타늄과 기계절삭티타늄 코핑의 변연적합성에 관한 연구

  • Oh Su-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Vang Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park Sang-Won (Department of Prosthodontic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park Ha-Ok (Department of Prosthodontic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
  • 오수연 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 방몽숙 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 양홍서 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 박상원 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 박하옥 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소)
  • Published : 2006.02.01

Abstract

Statement of problem: The titanium has advantages of a high biocompatibility, a corrosion resistence, low density, and cheep price, so it is focused as a substituted alloy But it is quite difficult to cast with the tranditional method due to the high melting point, reacivity with element at, elevated temperature. By using the CAD-CAM system for the crown construction, it is possible to reduce the errors while proceeding the wax-up, investing, and casting procedure Purpose: The purposes of this study were to measure the marginal adaptation of the casting titanium coping and machine-milled titanium coping according to the casting methods and the marginal configurations. Material and method: The marginal configurations were used chamfer shoulder, and beveled shoulder. The total 30 copings were used, and these are divided into 6 groups according to the manufacturing method and marginal configuration. The gap between margin of the model and the restoration was measured with 3-dimensional measuring microscope. Results: The following results were obtained; 1. casting gold coping demonstrated the best marginal seal, followed by casting titanium coping finally machine-milled titanium copings. 2. In casting titanium coping, chamfer demonstrated the best marginal seal, followed by shoulder and beveled shoulder. There was no significantly difference in shoulder and beveled shoulder. But all margin form has clinically acceptable 3. In machine-milled titanium copings, chamfer demonstrated the best marginal seal, followed by shoulder and beveled shoulder. Beveled shoulder show large and uneven marginal gap Conclusions: Above result revealed that marginal adaptation of the titanim coping is avail able in the clinical range, it can be used as an alternative metal and it is prefered especially in chamfer or shoulder margin during implant superstructure fabrication. But there should be more research on machine-milled titanium in order to use it in the clinics.

Keywords

References

  1. Parr GR. Gardner LK. Toth RW. Titanium : the mystery metal of implant dentistry Dental materials aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1985: 54:410-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90562-1
  2. Eugene PL. Peter M. Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materials. Int Dent J 1993:43: 245-53
  3. Reclaru L. Meyer JM. Study of corrosion between a titanium implant and dental alloy. J Dent 1994:22:159-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90200-3
  4. Bessing C, Bergman M. The castability of unalloyed titanium in three different casting machines. Swed Dent J 1992:16:109-13
  5. Mori T. Titanium: A reviews of investments for high temperature casting. Aust Prosthodont J 1993:7:31-4
  6. Watnabe I. Watkins JH. Nakajima H. Atsuta M. Okabe T. Effect of pressure difference on the quality of titanium casting. J Dent Res 1997:76:773-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760031001
  7. Vidovic Y, Chung HG. Mori T. Enhancement of a titanium denture frame model. Dent mater J 1995:14:256-62 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.14.256
  8. Rekow ED. Dental CAD-CAM systems-What is the state of the art? J Am Dent Assoc 1991:122:42-48
  9. King AW. Chai J. Lautenschiager E, Gilbert J. The mechanical properties of milled and cast titanium for ceramic veneering, Int J Prosthodont 1994:7:532-537
  10. Boening KW. Walter MH. Reppel PD. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1992:19:281-287 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01103.x
  11. Rinke S. Huls A. Jahn L. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength in conventional and copy milled all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthet 1995:8:303-310
  12. Pera P, Go:pdo S, Basi F. Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1994: 72:585-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90289-5
  13. Fuzzi M, Bouillaguet S, Holz J. Improved marginal adaptation of ceramic veneers. J Esthet Dent 1996:8:84-91 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb00889.x
  14. Wolf BH. Walter MH. Boening KW, Schmidt AE. Margin quality of titanium and high-gold inlays and onlays-a clnical study. Dent Mater 1998:14:370-374 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00008-1
  15. Karlsson S. The fit of Procera titanium crowns: An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993:51:129-34 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309041158
  16. Tjan AH. Li T. Logan GI. Baum L. Marginal accracy of complete crowns made from alternative casting alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1991:66: 157-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80041-1
  17. Donovan T. Prince J. An analysis of margin configurations for metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1985:53:153-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90097-6
  18. Holmes JR, Pilcher ES. Rivers JA. Marginal fit of electroformed ceramometal crowns. J Prosthodont 1996:5:111-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00284.x
  19. Valderrama S.Van Roekel N. Andersson M. Goodacre CJ. Munoz CA. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and, gold-platinum-palladium metalceramic crown. Int J Prosthodont 1995: 8:29-37
  20. Shillingburge HT. Hobo S. Fisher DW. Porcelain-fused to metal restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1973 :30: 28-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90075-9
  21. Samet N. Resheff B. Gelbard S. Stern NA. CAD-CAM system for the production of metal copings for porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1995:73:457-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80075-7
  22. Mclean JW. Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971: 131: 107-11 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  23. Fransson B. Oilo G. Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns clinical study. Dent Mater 1985:1:197-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80019-1
  24. Nilson H. Bergman B. Bessing S. Lundquist P. Andersson M. Titanium copings veneered with Procera ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1994: 7: 115-19
  25. Jenkins CB. Phillips RW. An evaluation of five inlay investing techniq ues employed with different type of wax patterns. J Prosthet Dent 1971:25:211-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90110-7
  26. Grajower R. Zuberi Y. Lewinstein I. lmproveing the fit of crowns with die spacers. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61 : 555-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90275-8
  27. Meyer G. Schafers F. Titanium:A new avenue for inlay and partial crown technique. Dent Labor 1990; 38: 651-53
  28. Ida, K, Tani Y, Tsutsumi S. Togaya T. Nambu T. Suese K Kawazoe T. Nakamura M. Wada H. Clinical application of pure titanium crowns. Dent mater J 1985;4: 1915
  29. Chan DC. Blackman R. Kaiser DA. Chung K, The effect of sprue design on the marginal accuracy of titanium casting. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 424-9 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00268.x
  30. Leong DK, Chai JY. Gibert J. Marginal fit of machine- milled titanium and casting titanium single crown. Int J Proshtodont 1994; 7 :440-47
  31. Harris IR. Wickens JL. A comparison of the fit of spark-eroded titanium coping and cast gold-alloy copings. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:348-55
  32. Holmes JR. Bayne SC. Holland GA. Sulik WD. Considerations in meas urement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 405-805-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4