A Study on Spark Ignition Natural Gas Engines

  • Cho Haeng-Muk (Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Kongju National University)
  • Published : 2006.05.01

Abstract

Natural gas is a promising alternative fuel to meet strict engine emission regulations in many countries. Natural gas engines can operate at lean burn and stoichiometric burn conditions with different combustion and emission characteristics. In this paper, the fuel economy, emissions, misfire, knock and cycle-to-cycle variations in indicated mean effective pressure of lean burn natural gas engines are highlighted. Stoichiometric burn natural gas engines are briefly reviewed. To keep the output power and torque of natural gas engines comparable to that of gasoline engines, high boosting pressure should be used. High activity catalyst for methane oxidation and lean deNOx system or three way catalyst with precisely control strategies should be developed to meet stringent emission standards.

Keywords

References

  1. King S R. The Impact of Natural Gas Composition on Fuel Metering and Engine Operational Characteristics. SAE 920593
  2. Borges L H, Hollnagel C, Muraro W. Development of a Mercedes-Benz Natural Gas Engine M366LAG with a Lean-Burn Combustion System. SAE 962378
  3. Sobiesiak A, Zhang S. The First and Second Law Analysis of Spark Ignition Engine Fuelled With Compressed Natural Gas. SAE 2003-01-3091
  4. Ting D S K, Checkel M D. The effects of turbulence on spark-ignited, ultra lean, premixed methane-air flame growth in a combustion chamber. SAE 952410
  5. Mtui P L, Hill P G. Ignition delay and combustion duration with natural gas fueling of diesel engines. SAE 961933
  6. Tilagone R, Monnier G, Chaouche A, Baguelin Y, De Chauveron S. Development of a High Efficiency, Low Emission SI-CNG Bus Engine. SAE 961080
  7. Kato T, Saeki K, Nishide H, Yamada T. Development of CNG fueled engine with lean burn for small size commercial van. JSAE Review , 2001, 22:365–368 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0389-4304(01)00104-7
  8. Neuberger M, Schimek M G, Horak F J, Moshammer H,Kundi M, Frischer T, Gomiscek B, Puxbaum H, Hauck H. Acute effects of particulate matter on respiratory diseases, symptoms and functions: epidemiological results of the Austrian Project on Health Effects of Particulate Matter (AUPHEP). Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38, 3971-3981 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.12.044
  9. Frailey M, Norton P, Clark N N, Lyons D W. An Evaluation of Natural gas versus Diesel in Medium-Duty Buses. SAE 2000-01-2822
  10. Varde K S, Asar G M M. Burn rates in natural-gas-fueled, single-cylinder spark ignition engine. SAE 2001-28-0023
  11. Reynolds C C O, Evans R L, Andreassi L, Cordiner S, Mulone V. The Effect of Varying the Injected Charge Stoichiometry in a Partially Stratified Charge Natural Gas Engine. SAE 2005-01-0247
  12. Varde K S, Patro N, Drouillard K. Lean burn natural gas fueled S.I. engine and exhaust emissions. SAE 952499
  13. Kato K, Igarashi K, Masuda M, Otsubo K, Yasuda A, Takeda K, Sato, T. Development of Engine for Natural Gas Vehicle. SAE 1999-01-0574
  14. Tilagone R, Venturi S. Development of Natural Gas Demonstrator Based on an Urban Vehicle with a Down-Sized Turbocharged Engine. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP, 2004, 59 (6): 581-591 https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2004042
  15. Einewall P, Tunestål P,Johansson B. Lean Burn Natural Gas Operation vs. Stoichiometric Operation with EGR and a Three Way Catalyst. SAE 2005-01-0250
  16. Das A, Watson H C.Development of a natural gas spark ignition engine for optimum performance. Proc.Instn. Mech Engrs, Part D, 1997, Vol. 211, 361-378
  17. Chiu J P, Wegrzyn J, Murphy K M. Low Emissions Class 8 Heavy-Duty, On-Highway Natural Gas and Gasoline Engine. SAE 2004-01-2982
  18. Corbo P, Gambino M, Iannaccone S, Unich A. Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines. SAE 950057