DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Nutritional Value of Brown Rice and Maize for Growing Pigs

  • Li, X.L. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Yuan, S.L. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Piao, X.S. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Lai, C.H. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zang, J.J. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Ding, Y.H. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Han, L.J. (KLMPASI, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Han, In K. (Hans' Animal Life Science Foundation)
  • 투고 : 2005.09.06
  • 심사 : 2006.01.12
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01

초록

An experiment was designed to study the nutritional value of Chinese brown rice and maize for growing pigs. Six male grower pigs (Duroc${\times}$Landrace${\times}$Large White, $24.3{\pm}1.26$ kg average initial BW) were surgically fitted with a simple T-cannula at the terminal ileum and allotted within a $2{\times}2$ Latin square design. The pigs were fed either a maize or brown rice diet in a direct method to determine their digestibility. The brown rice used in this experiment was husked from one kind of early, long grain, and non-glutinous rice (ELGNR, indica rice: non-waxy rice, containing amylopectin and amylose) in southern China. Chromic oxide was used as a marker. The diets were supplied at about 4.0% of body weight in dry matter/d. Total faeces and urine were collected on days 4 and 5; digesta was collected on days 6-8 in each period. The average body weight was 24.3 kg at the start of the experiment and 27.6 kg at the end. The results showed that the apparent ileal digestibilities of most amino acids of brown rice were significantly higher than those in maize (p<0.01), as were the apparent ileal digestibilities of crude protein (CP), digestible energy (DE), organic matter (OM) and dry matter (DM) (p<0.05). However, the apparent ileal starch digestibilities of the two treatments were similar (p>0.05). The values of the apparent faecal digestibilities derived from the two methods, marker and total faecal-collection methods, were very similar and also correlated with each other. The difference in absolute value of the apparent faecal digestibilities between brown rice and maize was smaller compared to that of the apparent ileal digestibilities. The net protein utilization was higher (p = 0.07) and the DE metabolizable rate was significantly higher (p<0.01) for brown rice than for maize. The metabolizable energy (ME) of brown rice is similar to that of maize, while the DE of brown rice was relatively lower. It can be concluded that Chinese brown rice are better than maize not only in apparent ileal digestibilities, but also in metabolizable rate of amino acids and gross energy under the present study conditions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Association of Cereal Chemists. 2000. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 10th Ed. AACC Inc. Washington, DC
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA
  3. Bird, A. R., T. Hayakawa, Y. Marsono, J. M. Gooden, I. R. Record, R. L. Correll and D. L. Topping. 2000. Coarse brown rice increases facal and large bowel short-chain fatty acids and starch but lowers calcium in the large bowel of pigs. J. Nutr. 130:1780-1787
  4. Fan, M. Z., W. C. Sauer, R. T. Hardin and K. A. Lien. 1994. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs: effect of dietary amino acid level. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2851-2859
  5. Farrell, D. J. 1994. Utilization of rice bran in diet for domestic fowl and ducklings. World's Poult. Sci. J. 50:115-131 https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19940012
  6. Green, S., S. L. Bertrand, M. J. C. Duron and R. A. Maillard. 1987. Digestibilities of aminoacid in maize, wheat and barley meal, measured in pigs with ileo-rectal anastomosis and isolation of the large intestine. J. Sci. Food Agric. 41:29-43 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740410104
  7. He, R. G., Y. L. Ma, Y. Q. Wang, J. Y. Zhao and H. X. Wang. 1994. Study of the brown rice nutritional value by the pig's digestion and metabolism trial. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 13:268-273
  8. He, J. H., M. H. Huang, H. Jin, S. Y. Ceng and Q. G. Xu. 2000. Nutritional character of fodder paddy and brown rice: the 8th Symposium on Chinese Animal Nutrition of Chinese Animal Nutrition Association. The people's Publishing Company of Heilongjiang. pp. 189-193
  9. Kimura, F. T. and V. L.Miller. 1957. Improved determination of chromic oxide in cow feed and feces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 5:216 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60073a008
  10. Li, D. F., D. F. Zhang, X. S. Piao, In K. Han, C. J. Yang, J. B. Li and J. H. Lee. 2002. Effects of replacing maize with Chinese brown rice on growth performance and apparent faecal digestibility of nutrients in weanling pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1191-1197 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1191
  11. Li, J. B., D. F. Li, Y. L. Yin, X. S. Piao, J. H. He, G. P. Chen and J. C. Shu. 2004. Performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal disaccharidase activity of weaner/grower pigs given diets containing extruded Chinese stored brown rice with exogenous enzyme supplements. Anim. Sci. 79:429-438 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800090299
  12. Li, S. and W. C. Sauer. 1994. The effect of dietary fat content on amino acid digestibility in young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1737-1743
  13. Lin, F. D., D. A. Knabe and T. D. Tanksley. 1987. Apparent digestibility of amino acids, gross energy and starch in maize, sorghum, wheat, barley, oat groats and wheat middlings for growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 64:1655-1663 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.6461655x
  14. National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th Ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC
  15. Piao, X. S., D. F. Li, In. K. Han, Y. Chen, J. H. Lee, D. Y. Wang, J. B. Li and D. F. Zhang. 2002. Evaluation of Chinese brown rice as an alternative energy source in pig diets. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:89-93 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.89
  16. Sauer, W. C. and L. Ozimek. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Result and their practical application: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 15:367-387 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(86)90076-X
  17. SPSS Inc. 1998. SPSS 9.0 for windows update. Chicago, Illinois
  18. Sukhija, P. S. and D. L. Palmquist. 1988. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and faeces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:1202-1206 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00084a019
  19. Wang, J. F. 2000. Effects of dietary fiber and starch on gastrointestinal microflora, energy metabolism and in vitro fermentation in pigs. Ph. D. Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing
  20. Zhang, D. F., D. F. Li, X. S. Piao, In. K. Han, C. J. Yang, I. S. Shin, J. G. Dai and J. B. Li. 2002. Effects of replacing maize with brown rice or brown rice with enzyme on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1334-1340 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1334
  21. Zhang, S. R., K. X. Tian, J. C. Wang, M. H. Huang, W. J. Shen. and H. Jin. 1999a. Comparison on the feeding value between brown rice diet and maize diet in growing pig. Feed Industry of China. 20:26-27
  22. Zhang, S. R., K. X. Tian, J. C. Wang and Y. R. Zhao. 1999b. Evaluation on digestibility and metabolism characters on fodder brown rice and maize in the pig. Feed Industry of China. 20:31-32

피인용 문헌

  1. Digestible indispensable amino acid score and digestible amino acids in eight cereal grains vol.111, pp.09, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513004273
  2. The effects of feeding rice in substitution of corn and the degree of starch gelatinization of rice on the digestibility of dietary components and productive performance of young pigs1,2 vol.86, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-697
  3. Effects of microbial phytase on the apparent and standardized total tract digestibility of phosphorus in rice coproducts fed to growing pigs vol.93, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-8877
  4. Effects of brown rice particle size on energy and nutrient digestibility in diets for young pigs and adult sows pp.13443941, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13127
  5. Effects of Enzyme Supplementation on Growth, Intestinal Content Viscosity, and Digestive Enzyme Activities in Growing Pigs Fed Rough Rice-based Diet vol.21, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70289
  6. Effect of Particle Size of Brown Rice on Digestibility of Energy and Crude Protein in Growing-Finishing Pigs vol.53, pp.4, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5938/youton.53.4_137
  7. Replacement of corn with rice grains did not alter growth performance and rumen fermentation in growing Hanwoo steers vol.33, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0691
  8. Effects of Substitution of Corn with Ground Brown Rice on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Gut Microbiota of Growing-Finishing Pigs vol.11, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020375
  9. Rice as an alternative feed ingredient in swine diets vol.63, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e5