Removal of Dissolved Organic Matters in Drinking Water by GAC adsorption using RSSCT

RSSCT를 이용한 GAC의 상수원수 내 용존유기물질 제거

  • 김영일 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원 상하수도연구소) ;
  • 배병욱 (대전대학교 환경생명공학과)
  • Received : 2006.08.08
  • Accepted : 2006.09.26
  • Published : 2006.10.15

Abstract

Granular activated carbon (GAC) has been identified as a best available technology (BAT) by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for removal disinfection by-product (DBP) precursors, such as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON). Rapid small-scale column test (RSSCT) were used to investigate four types of carbon (F400, Norit1240, Norit40S, and Aquasorb1500) for their affinity to absorb natural organic matter (NOM). DOC, $UV_{254}$, and Total dissolved nitrogen (TON) concentrations were measured in the column effluent to track GAC breakthrough. DOC and $UV_{254}$ breakthrough occurred at around 3500 bed volumes (BVs) of operation for all GACs investigated. The $UV_{254}$ breakthrough curves showed 33% to 48% at 8000 BVs, when the DOC was 48% to 65%. All GACs showed greater removal in DOC than $UV_{254}$. The NORIT1240 GAC was determined to have the highest adsorption capacity for DOC and $UV_{254}$. The removal of nitrate (NOTN) had not broken through over BVs. The initial TON breakthrough curves were started around 50%, when the DOC breakthrough was only 10 % at 500 BVs. The curves were gradually increased after 3500 BVs and approximately 69% through 81% of TON breakthrough occurred at 8000 BVs. All of the GACs were able to remove TON, in the case of this investigation the majority of the TON was present as DON. Because nitrate nitrogen was seldom removed and ammonium nitrogen ($NH_3-N$) was not detected in the effluent from RSSCTs even though raw water. The carbon usage rate of DOC was from 2 to 6 times less than that of TON. The NORIT1240 GAC demonstrated the best performance in terms of DOC removal, while the F400 GAC was best in terms of TON removal. Excitation emission matrix(EEM) analysis was used to show that GAC adsorption successfully removed most of Humic-like DOC and Fulvic-like DOCs. However, soluble microbial product(SMP)-like DOC in the absence of raw water were detected in the NORIT40S and Aquasorb1500 GAC. The authors assumed that this results is due probably to the part of GAC in the RSSCT which was converted into biological activated carbon(BAC). To compare with organics removal by GAC according to preloading, the virgin GACs had readily accessible sites that were adsorbed DOC more rapidly than preloaded GACs, but the TDN removal had not showed differences between those GACs.

Keywords

References

  1. Caper, G., Demirer, G.N., Dilek, F.B. and Yetis, U. (2001) Removal of trihalomethane precursors by granular activated carbon treatment, FEB, 10(2), pp. 197-202
  2. Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. and Booksh, K. (2003) Fluorescence excitation emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter, Envir. Sci. Tech., 37(24), pp. 5701-5710 https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
  3. Cheng, W., Dastgheib, S.A. and Karanfil, T. (2005) Adsorption of dissolved natural organic matter by modified activated carbons, War. Res., 39(11), pp. 2281-2290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.031
  4. Crittenden, J.C., Berrigan, J.K., Hand, D.W. and Lykins, B. (1987) Design of rapid fixed-bed adsorption tests for nonconstant diffusivities, Envirn. Engr., 113(2), pp. 243-259 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1987)113:2(243)
  5. Crittenden, J.C., Reddy, P.S., Arora, H., Trynoski, J., Hand D.W., Perram D.L. and Summers, R.S. (1991) Predicting GAC performance with rapid small-scale column tests, AWWA, 83(1), pp. 77-87 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1991.tb07088.x
  6. Crittenden, J.C, Berrigan, J.K. and Hand, D.W. (1996) Design of rapid small-scale adsorption tests for a constant diffusivity, Water Pollut. Control Fed., 58(4), pp. 312-319
  7. Cwnmings, L. and Summers, R.S. (1994) Using RSSCTs to predict field-scale GAC control of DBP formation, AWWA, 86(6), pp. 88-97 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1994.tb06212.x
  8. International Humic Substances Society (IHSS), http:// www.ihss.gatech.edul
  9. Jacangelo, J.G., DeMarco, J., Owen, D.M. and Randtke, S.J. (1995) Selected processes for removing NOM: an overview, AWWA, 87(1), pp. 64-77
  10. Knappe, D.R.U, Snoeyink, V.L., Roche, P., Prados, M.J. and Bourhigot, M.M. (1997) The effect of preloading on rapid small-scale column test predictions of atrazine removal by GAC: adsorbers, Wat. Res., 31(11), pp. 2899-2909 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00148-6
  11. Knappe, D.R.U, Snoeyink, V.L., Roche, P., Prados, M.J. and Bourhigot, M.M. (1999) Atrazine removal by preloaded GAC, AWWA, 91(10), pp. 97-109 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1999.tb08719.x
  12. Leenheer, J.A. and Croue, J.P. (2003) Characterizing aquatic dissolved organic matter, Envir. Sci. Tech., 37(1), pp. 19A-26A
  13. Mobed, J.J., Hemmingsen, S.L., Autry, J.L. and McGown, L.B. (1996) Fluorescence characterization of IHSS humic suhstances: Total luminescence spectra with absorhance correction, Envir. Sci. Tech., 30(10), pp. 3061-3065 https://doi.org/10.1021/es960132l
  14. Rodriguez-Fuentes, R., Hilts, B.A. and Dvorak, B.I. (2005) Disinfection by-product precursor adsorption as function of GAC properties: case study, Envirn. Engr., 131(10), pp. 1462-1465 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:10(1462)
  15. Sontheimer, H., Crittenden, J.C and Summers, R.S. (1988) Activated carbon for water treatment, 2nd Ed., DVGWForschungsstelle, Karlsruhe
  16. Weber, W.J. Jr. (2004) Preloading of CAC by natural organic matter in potable water treatment systems:Mechanisms, effects and design considerations, J SRT-Aqua, 53(7), pp. 469-482
  17. Westerhoff, P. and Mash, H. (2002) Dissolved organic nitrogen in drinking water supplies: a review, J SRT-Aqua, 51(8), pp. 415-448
  18. Westerhoff, P., Lee, W., Croue, J.P., Gallard, H. and Amy, G. (2006) Organic nitrogen in drinking water and reclaimed wastewater, American Water Works Association Research Foundation (AWWARF)
  19. USEPA (2006) United States Federal Register, 40 CFR Parts 9,141 and 142, 71(2), pp. 388-493