KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bridge Scour Prioritization and Management System (I) - System Development -

교량세굴 위험도 결정 및 유지관리 시스템 개발(I) - 시스템 개발 -

  • 곽기석 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구부) ;
  • 박재현 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구부) ;
  • 정문경 (한국건설기술연구원 대외협력실) ;
  • 우효섭 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구부)
  • Received : 2005.09.26
  • Accepted : 2006.02.14
  • Published : 2006.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A bridge scour management system is developed to evaluate the vulnerability of bridge piers to scour and to help establish effective disaster measures, taking into account the locality and scour characteristics in Korea. This system is programmed using the techniques of the geographical information system(GIS) for the storage, retrieval, and display of information regarding to bridge scour. The system functions are basically divided into two parts; prioritization and maintenance. Bridges are initially screened and prioritized for bridge scour inspection and evaluation using the basic information which is obtained from the office review. The bridge scour evaluation including site investigation is performed and the vulnerability of bridge piers is categorized into six groups taking into account the local scour depth, foundation bearing capacity, foundation type, foundation depth, and present scour condition. The system tabulates and plots all the data and the results.

본 연구에서는 세굴에 의한 교량기초의 위험도를 평가하고 효율적인 방재 대책수립을 위해 국내 세굴 특성을 고려한 교량 세굴 유지관리 시스템을 개발하였다. 본 시스템은 GIS 기반 프로그램으로서 교량세굴 자료의 저장, 검색 및 출력이 가능하며, 크게 교량세굴 위험도에 따른 우선순위의 결정 및 유지관리 시스템의 두 부분으로 나뉜다. 교량에 대한 기존의 간단한 자료를 이용하여 초기 분류과정을 거쳐 현장 상세조사 우선순위가 결정되며, 이에 따라 현장 상세조사와 세굴 해석을 실시하여 교량세굴 위험도 등급을 결정한다. 위험도 등급은 예상 세굴심과 그에 따른 기초의 지지력 변화, 기초의 종류 및 근입깊이, 현재의 세굴 진행상태 등을 고려하여 모두 6등급으로 나뉘며 그 결과는 화면상에 표시되고 모든 자료는 데이터베이스 시스템에 저장되어 관리된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부(1995) 교량구조물의 보수.보강 공법 편람
  2. 건설교통부(2000) 교량, 터널 안전점검 및 정밀안전진단 세부지침
  3. 건설교통부(2005) 도로교설계기준
  4. 건설교통부(2005) 도로설계기준
  5. 곽기석 등(2004) 교량기초 장수명화 기술 개발. 연구보고서, 건기연 2004-034, 한국건설기술연구원
  6. 여운광, 강준구(1999) 우리나라 중소 하천의 세굴특성 조사연구 (1) 한국수자원학회 논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제32권, 제l호, pp.41-47
  7. 우효섭 등(1993) 평형하상겸사 추정방법의 개발. 연구보고서, 건기연 93-WR-112, 한국건설기술연구원
  8. 한국수자원학회(2005) 하천설계기준
  9. 한국지반공학회(2003) 구조물기초 설계기준
  10. 행정자치부(195-2003) 재해연보
  11. Briaud, J.L., Ting, F., Chen, H.C., Gudavalli, S.R., Perugu, S., and Wei, G. (1999) SRICOS: Prediction of scour rate in cohesive soils at bridge piers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 125, No.4, pp. 237-246 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:4(237)
  12. De Falco, E, Gentile, M., and Mancini, M. (1997) Hydraulic Vulnerability Due to Scour at Bridge Piers and Monitoring Systems. The Italian Railways Experience. C.I.S.M. Course on Hydraulic Phenomena in Proximity of Bridges, Udine, Italy
  13. De Falco, F. and Mancini, M. (1998) A procedure to estimate hydraulic vulnerability of bridge foundations, italian railways. Internal Rep., Rome
  14. Farrag, K. and Morvant, M. (2002) Database program for highway bridge-scour data, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Scour of Foundations, ICSF-I, College Station, Texas, U.S.A, Vol. 1, pp. 272-282
  15. Federico, F., Silvagni, G., and Volpi, F. (2003) Scour vulnerability of river bridge piers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 10, pp. 890-899 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:10(890)
  16. FHWA (1991) Bridge Inspector's Training Manual/90
  17. Ho, C.L., Di Stasi, J.M., and Rees, P. (2002) GIS-Based bridge scour prioritization. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Scour of Foundations, ICSF-I, College Station, Texas, U.S.A, Vol. 2, pp. 516-527
  18. Kwak, K. (2000) Prediction of Scour Depth versus Time for Bridge Piers in Cohesive Soils in the Case of Multi-Flood and Multi-Layer Soil Systems, PhD dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A
  19. Meyerhof, G.G. (1976) Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. GT3, pp. 197-228
  20. Nowak, A.S. (1990) Bridge evaluation, repair and rehabilitation. Applied Science, Vol. 187
  21. Pagan-Ortiz, J.E. (2002) Impact of the federal highway administration's scour evaluation program in the united states of north america's highway bridges. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Scour of Foundations, ICSF-I, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A., Vol 2. pp. 636-641
  22. Palmer, R. and Turkiyyah, G. (1997) CAESAR: An Expert System for Cataloging and Expert Evaluation of Scour Risk at Bridge Sites. Research Report, Dept. of Civil Eng., University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
  23. Shirhole, A.M. and Holt, R.C. (1991) Planning for a comprehensive bridge safety assurance program. Transportation Research Record, No. 1290, pp. 137-142
  24. Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B. (1967) Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. John Wiley and Sons, New York
  25. Vesic, A.S. (1973) Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. SM1, pp. 45-73
  26. Vijayvergiya, V.N. and Focht, J.A.Jr. (1972) A new way to predict capacity of piles in clay. Proc. of the 4th Annual Offshore Technical Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 865-874