DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수도작 포장의 고저차 분석

Variation Analysis of Elevation within a Rice Paddy Field

  • Sung J.H. (National Institute of Agricultural Engineering RDA) ;
  • Jang S.W. (National Institute of Agricultural Engineering RDA)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01

초록

Elevation differences within a paddy field relate strongly to plant health, crop homogeneity, and pest control. For precision agriculture (PA), the elevation within a field should be precisely controlled. We analyzed variation in elevation within a rice paddy field over one crop cycle. The study took place in a rectangular plot (100 m x 30 m). Elevations within the a plots was measured by a laser-equipped surveying instrument, that could determine elevations to precisions of I mm. The test field was divided into grids with 30 squares; elevation was measured at the center of each 5 x 10-m grid square. This study measured elevation during nine observation periods from pre-plowing to post-harvest. Descriptive statistics showed the highest elevations after plowing due to soil disturbance. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant elevation differences before and after plowing and transplanting, although elevations were similar over the period of crop growth. Comparison of pre-plowing and post-harvest data showed differences in elevations, indicating that elevation changes occurred during plowing, rice transplanting, plant growth, and harvesting. In summary, the above statistical analysis indicated that elevation changes occurred due to plowing but not during the plant growth season or due to harvesting.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 농업기계화연구소. 1997. 시험연구사업 시험보고서
  2. 성제훈, 장순우. 2005. 수도작 포장의 고저차 측정을 위한 최적 받침대 선정. 바이오시스템공학회지 30(5):268-273 https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2005.30.5.268
  3. 작물과학원. 2002. 시험연구사업 시험보고서
  4. 차진팔, 박우풍. 1997. 레이저 균평기 개발. 농업공학연구소 시험연구사업보고서
  5. Brown D. G., and T. J. Bara. 1994. Recognition and reduction of systematic error in elevation and derivation surfaces from 71/2 minute DEMs. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 60:189-194
  6. Kravchenko A. N. 2003. Influence of spatial structure on accuracy of interpolation mehtods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:1564-1571 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1564
  7. Sadler E. J, W. J. Busscher, P. J. Bauer, and D. L. Karlen. 1998. Spatial scale requirements for precision farming: A case study in the southeastern USA Agron. J. 90:191-197 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000020012x
  8. Sudduth K. A, S. T. Drummond, S. J. Birrell and N. R. Kitchen. 1996. Analysis of spatial factors influencing crop yield. Int'l Proc. 3rd lnt. Conf. On Precision Agriculture, O.C. Robert et al.(ed.) pp.129-140
  9. Westphalen M. L., B. L. Steward and S. Han. 2004. Topographic mapping through measurement of vehicle attitude and elevation. Trans. of ASAE 47:1841-1849 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17601