The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

EFFECTS OF VARIOUS SURFACE TREATMENTS FOR TITANIUM ON SURFACE MICRO ROUGHNESS, STATIC WETTABILITY, FIBRONECTIN ADSORPTION

표면 처리 방법에 따른 타이타늄의 미세 표면 거칠기, 표면 젖음성, fibronectin 흡착량에 미치는 영향

  • Shin Hwa-Sub (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Kim Young-Su (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Shin Sang-Wan (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
  • 신화섭 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 고급치과보철학과) ;
  • 김영수 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원) ;
  • 신상완 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 고급치과보철학과)
  • Published : 2006.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to get the fundamental data which is necessary to the development direction of implant surface treatment hereafter, based on the understanding the surface structure and properties of titanium which is suitable for the absorption of initial tissue fluid by researching effects of additional surface treatments fir sandblasted with large git and acid-etched(SLA) titanium on surface micro-roughness, static wettability, fibronectin adsorption Materials and Method: In the Control groups, the commercial pure titanium disks which is 10mm in diameter and 2mm in thickness were treated with HCI after sandblasting with 50$\mu$m $Al_2O_3$. The experiment groups were made an experiment each by being treated with 1) 22.5% nitric acid according to SLA+ASTM F86 protocol, 2) SLA+30% peroxide, 3) SLA+NaOH, 4) SLA+ Oxalic acid, and 5) SLA+600$^{\circ}C$ heating. In each group, the value of Ra and RMS which are the gauges of surface roughness was measured, surface wettability was measured by analyzing with Sessile drop method, and fibronectin adsorption was measured with immunological assay. The significance of each group was verified by (SPSS, ver.10.0 SPSS Inc.) Kruskal-Wallis Test. (α=0.05) And the correlation significance between Surface micro-roughness and surface wettability. surface roughness and fibronectin adsorption, and surface wettability and fibronectin adsorption was tested by Spearman's correlation analysis. Result: All measure groups showed the significant differences in surface micro-roughness, surface wettability, and fibronectin adsorption. (p<0.05) There was no significance in correlation among the surface micro-roughness, surface wettability, and fibronectin adsorption. (p>0.05) Conclusion: Surface micro-roughness and surface wettability rarely affected the absorption of initial tissue fluid on the surface of titanium.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrecktsson T, Sennerby L. State of the art in oral implant. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18:474-81 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x
  2. Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of the literature supplied by system manufacturers. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:271-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70184-7
  3. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:946-56
  4. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. lnt J Oral Maxillofac implants 2000;15:668-74
  5. Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjorting-Hansen E. Anchorage of $TiO_2$-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: experimental study with rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29: 1223-31 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820291009
  6. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2: 120-28 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x
  7. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U,Thomsen P. Failure patterns of four ossointergrated oral implant systems. J Mater Sci: Mat Med 1997;8:843-47 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018593403126
  8. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, Krozer A, Jeong YS, Wennerberg A, Albrectsson T. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxide thickness. micro-pore configurations. surface roughness. crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002 ;23 :491-501 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00131-4
  9. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dental Resear 2004; 83:529-33 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300704
  10. Park JY, Cynthia H, Gemmell, John E, Davies. Platelet interactions with titanium: modulation of platelet activity by surface topography. Biomaterials 2001;22: 2671-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00009-6
  11. Kim JS, Shin SY, Ryu JJ. A study on the stability of 5 different surface treatment methods to dental implant using resonance frequency and histomorphometric analysis. J Kor Acad Prosthodontics 2005;43: 78-94
  12. MacDonald DE, Deo N, Markovic B, Stranick M, Somasundaran P. Adsorption and dissolution behavior of human plasma fibronectin on thermally and chemically modified titanium dioxide particles. Biomaterials 2002;23: 1269-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00317-9
  13. Rupp F, Scheideler D, Rehbein D, Axmann J, Geis-Gerstorfer Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. Biomaterials 2004;25: 1429-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.015
  14. Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, Vaudaux p, Szmukler-Moncler, Descouts P. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8: 208-16 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080307.x
  15. Kilpadi DV, Raikar GN, Liu J, Lemons JE, Vohra Y, Grgory JC. Effect of surface treatment on unalloyed titanium implants: Spectroscopic analyses. J Biomed Mater Researches 1998;40: 646-59 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<646::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-D
  16. Dean JW III, Culbertson KC, D' Angelo AM. Fibronectin and Laminin enhance gingival cell attachment to dental implant surfaces in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1995; 10:721-28
  17. Schneider G, Burridge K. Formation of focal adhesions by osteoblasts adhering to different substrata. Experimental Cell Research 1994;214:264-69 https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1994.1257
  18. Kilpadi KL, Chang PL, Bellis SL. Hydroxylapatite binds more serum proteins, purified integrins and osteoblast precursor cells than titanium or steel. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;57:258-67 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200111)57:2<258::AID-JBM1166>3.0.CO;2-R
  19. MacDonald DE, Rapuano BE, Deo N, Stranick M, Boskey AL. Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-alumiurn-vanadium implant materials: effect on surface properties, glycoprotein adsorption, and MG63 cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004;25:3135-146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.029
  20. Perrin D, Szmukler-Moncler S, Echikou C, Pointaire P, Bernard JP. Bone response to alteration of surface topography and surface composition of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13:465-69 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130504.x
  21. F-86 AS. Standard practice for surface preparation and marking of metallical surgical implant. Annual book of ASTM standards F86-ENG 2001
  22. Malmsten M. Ellipsometry studies of the effects of surface hydrophobicity on protein adsorption. Colloids Surf 1995;3: 297-308 https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-7765(94)01139-V
  23. Lenka J, Frank A. Muller, Ales Helebrant. Jakub strnad, Peter Greil. Biomometic apatite formation on chemically treated titanium. Biomaterials 2004;25: 1187-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.009
  24. Iniesta J, Gonzalez-Garcia J, Fernandez J, Montiel V, Aldaz A. On the voltammetric behavior of a platinized titanium surface with respect to the specific hydrogen and anion adsorptioin and charge transfer process. J Mat Chem 1999;9:3141-45 https://doi.org/10.1039/a903479j
  25. Lim YJ, Oshida Y. Initial contact angle measurements on variously treated dental/medical titanium materials. Biomed Mater Eng 2001;11: 325-41
  26. Hanna KM, Malgorzata NW, Jacek, D, Robert K. Adsorption. characteristics of human plasma fibronectin in relationship to cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61: 260-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10151
  27. Albrecktsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodontics 2004; 17: 544-63
  28. Martin JY, Schwartz TW, Hummert DM. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cell(MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290314
  29. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid etched(SLA) surface:Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA impalnts. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;12:144-53
  30. Kilpadi DV, Raikar GN, Liu J, Lemons JE, Vohra Y, Gregory JC. Effect of surface treatment on unalloyed titanium implants: Spectroscopic analyses. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 646-59 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<646::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-D
  31. Pan J, Liao H, Leygraf C, Thierry D, Li J. Variation of oxide films on titanium induced by osteoblast-like cell culture and the influence of an $H_2O_2$ pretreatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:244-56 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<244::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-L