Biological control of Tetranychus urticae by Phytoseiulus persimilis in eggplant greenhouse houses

시설가지에서 칠레이리응애를 이용한 점박이응애 밀도억제 효과

  • Published : 2006.08.01

Abstract

Biological control of Tetranychus urticae by Phytoseiulus persimilis was observed in eggp1ant greenhouse fur spring and autumn season culture. Tetranychus urticae was controlled to low density of less than 1 mite from June 24 after p. persimilis were released 3 times at rate of 10 per plant on June 1, 11, and 18, 2004 in spring season experiment. The population of Tetranychus urticae was also less than 1 mite per eggp1ant leaf from September 1 to October 22 after three times releases of 10 P. persimilis in autumn season experiment. In Phytoseiulus persimilis released plot, the percentage of leaves with T. urticae adults and nymphs were 8.6$\sim$13.3% and 5% or less in spring and autumn season experiment. The density of T urticae was from 1 to 2 on leaves with T urticae adults and nymphs.

봄과 가을에 시설 가지 하우스에서 칠레이리응애를 이용한 점박이응애 밀도억제효과를 조사하였다. 2004년 봄 재배 실험에서 칠레이리응애를 가지 1주당 10마리씩 3회 방사한 결과(6월 1일, 11일, 18일), 점박이응애 밀도는 6월 24일 이후 엽당 1마리 정도로 낮게 유지되었다. 가을 재배 실험에서도 칠레이리응애를 주당 10마리씩 3회 방사한 결과 9월 1일부터 10월 22일 까지 점박이응애는 엽당 1마리 정도이었다. 칠레이리응애 방사구에서 점박이응애 성충과 약충의 발생엽률은 봄 재배 실험에서 8.6$\sim$13.3%였고 가을재배 실험에서는 5% 이하였으며 발생엽에서의 점박이응애 밀도는 1$\sim$2마리였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, K.S., S.Y. Lee, K.Y. Lee, Y.S. Lee and G.H. Kim. 2004. Selective toxicity of pesticides to the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis and control effects of the two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae by predatory mite and pesticide mixture on rose. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 43: 71-79
  2. Chung, B.K., S.W. Kang, and J.H. Kwon. 2000. Chemical control system of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in greenhouses eggplant. J. Asia-pacific Entomol. 3(1): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60048-5
  3. Cloutier, C. and S.G. Johnson. 1993. Predation by Orius tristicolor (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae): Testing for compatibility between biocontrol agents. Environ. Entomol. 22: 477-482 https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/22.2.477
  4. Kim, D.H., K.S. Kim, J.W. Hyun and H.C. Lim. 2003. Release level of Amblyseius fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) for biological control of Panonychus citri mcGregor (Acari: Tetranychidae) on citrus. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 42: 233-240
  5. Kim, Y.H.. 1999. The development tendency of pest control using natural enemies. pp 3 -12. In Utilization and rearing of natural enemy, eds. by NIAST.223pp. Sangroksa
  6. Kim, Y.H., J.H. Kim and M.W. Han. 1999. A preliminary study on the biological control of Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida in Angelica utilis Makino by Phytoseiulus persimilis AnthiasHenriot (Acarina: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae). Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 38: 151-155
  7. McMurtry, J.A. 1982. The use of phytoseiids for biological control; Progress and future prespects, Div. Agric. Sci. Univ. Calif. Spec. Pulb. 3284: 23-48
  8. Prokopy, R.J. and C. Margaret. 1992. Studies on releases of mass reared organophosphate resistants Amblyseius fallacis (Germ.) predatory mites in Massachusetts commercial apple orchards. J. Appl, Entomol. 114: 131-137 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1992.tb01107.x
  9. Strong, W.B. and B.A. Croft. 1996. Release strategies and cultural modifications for biological control of twospotted spider mite by Neosieulus fallacis (Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae) on hops. Environ. Entomol. 25: 529-535 https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/25.2.529
  10. van Lenterenm R.G. and J.W. Woets. 1988. Biological and integrated pest control in greenhouses. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 33: 239-269 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.33.010188.001323
  11. Waite, G.K. 1988. Integrated control of Tetranychus urticae in strawberries in south east Queensland. Experimental and Applied Acarology 5(1-2): 23-32 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053812
  12. Yangziqi, F.T., H. Cao and F. Chen. 1990. Field plot releases of Phytoseiulus persimilis for controlling Tetranychus kanzawai in egg plant and common beans. Chinese Journal of Biological Control. 6: 88-89