Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지

An Exploration of the Development of School-based Curriculum Model for the Gifted in Elementary School

초등학교 영재들을 위한 학교교육과정 개발 모형 탐색

  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since 1992, the sixth national curriculum introduced the policy of school based curriculum development(SBCD) and required all the public elementary schools to develop their own curriculum for the gifted children in their schools. However, in spite of the fact that this curriculum policy for the gifted children has the history of 15 years until now, the current state of its implementation seems to be unsatisfactory. The major reason for that seems to be due to the reality that the schools have not had the theoretical basis for the curriculum development for the gifted children. In this vein, the researcher presented the theoretical SBCD model for the gifted children in elementary schools under the assumption that the model should suit the identity of elementary education, so that the gifted education in the elementary school can be implemented in its own form and adequacy. Based on the identity of elementary education, the model was developed by reformulating three component models of VanTassel-Baska's ICM: content model, process-product model, and epistemological model. The major feature of the researcher's model is to adapt and adjust the three component models differently according to the age level from the first to sixth graders in the elementary school. The model can be used not only as a general model for the talent pool of the school but also as an individual model for a specific gifted child by taking his special needs and characteristics into account. The model is a theoretical one based on the curriculum models for the gifted which were presented by several scholars in the area of G/T education, and it needs to be validated empirically in the future.

1992년 제6차 교육과정에서부터 도입된 초등학교 학교교육과정개발 정책은 단위 학교에서 영재들을 위한 교육과정을 개발하여 교육할 것을 주문하고 있다. 연구자는 그 활동을 돕기 위해 초등학교 영재들을 위한 학교교육과정 개발 모형을 구안하여 제시하였다. 본 모형은 VanTassel-Baska의 통합적 교육과정 모델(ICM: Integrated Curriculum Model)을 초등교육의 정체성에 비추어 재구성한 것으로서, ICM의 하위모델인 내용 모델, 과정 산출 모델, 인식론적 모델을 초등학교 $1{\sim}6$학년 아동들의 발달단계에 적절하게 그 적용 비중을 조절하는 것을 특징으로 하고 있다. 본 모형은 초등학교 영재 탤런트 풀을 대상으로 한 교육과정 개발의 일반 모형인 동시에, 영재 개개인의 특성과 요구에 따라서도 그 적용 비중이 달라질 수 있는 개인 모델로서도 기능할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (1999). 초등학교 교육과정 해설(I). 서울: 대한교과서
  2. Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999). Autonomous Learner Model: Optimizing ability. Greely, CO: Alps Publishing
  3. Blenkin, G. M., & Kelly, A. V. (1981). The primary curriculum. London: Harper & Row, Publishers
  4. Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B. A. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin: University of Texas Press
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time, and the development of talent. In R.J. Sternberg and J.E. Davidson (eds.), Conceptualization of giftedness(pp. 264-284). NY: Cambirdge University Press
  6. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1989). Education of the gifted and talented. NJ: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, Inc
  7. Dewey, J. (1971, 11th imp.). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
  8. Feldhusen, J. F., & Jarwan, F. A. (2000). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.j. Sternberg, & R.F. Subotnik(eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(pp. 271-282). NY: Elsvier
  9. Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, P. B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J.S. Renzulli(ed.), Systmes and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented(pp.126-152). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  10. Gagne, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent re-examining a re-examination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3). 103-112 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900302
  11. Jacobs, H. H., & Borland, J. H. (1986). The interdisciplinary concept model: Theory and practice. In J. VanTassel-Baska, & S.M. Reis(eds.), Curriculum for gifted and talented students(pp. 93-102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
  12. Marland, S. P., Jr. (1971). Education of the gifted and talented. Volme I: Report to the congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Educatio. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
  13. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being(2nd ed,). NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company
  14. Meeker, M. N., & Meeker, R. (1986). The SOI system for gifted education. In J.S. Renzulli(ed.), Systmes and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented(pp.194-215). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  15. Passow, A. H. (1982). Differentiated curriculum for the gifted/talented: A point of View. In S.N. Kaplan et al(eds.), Curricula for the gifted(pp.4-20). Ventura, CA:Ventura County Superintendent of School Office
  16. Passow, A. H. (1985). Gifted and talented, education of. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite(Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education(pp.2045-2056). Oxford, UK: Pergamon
  17. Passow, A. H., Goldberg, M. L., Tannenbaum, A.J., & French, W.(1955). Planning for talented youth. NYC: Teachers College Press
  18. Pyryt, M. C. (2000). Talent development in science and technology. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.J. Sternberg, & R.F. Subotnik(eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(pp. 427-438). NY: ELSEVIER
  19. Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (1997). The School-wide Enrichment Model: New directions for developing high-end learning. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education(pp.136-154). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
  20. Richert, E. S., Alvino, J. J., & McDonnel, R. C. (1982). National report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth. Sewell, NJ: Educational Improvement Center-South
  21. Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11(4). 249-260
  22. Santrock, J. W. (1996). Child development. Dubuque, IA: Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc
  23. Schlichter, C. L. (1997). Talents unlimited model in programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis(eds.), Handbook of gifted education(pp.318-327). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  24. Treffinger, D. J. (1986). Fostering effective independent learning through individualized programming. In J.S. Renzulli(ed), Systems and models for developing effective programs for the gifted and talented(pp.429-460). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  25. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1986). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. In J. VanTassel-Baska, & S.M. Reis(eds.), Curriculum for gifted and talented students(pp. 1-12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
  26. VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. In J. VanTassel- Baska, & S.M. Reis(eds.), Curriculum for gifted and talented students(pp. 147-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
  27. VanTassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L. D., & Little, C. A. (2002). A curriculum study of gifted-student learning in the language arts. In C.A. Tomilson, & S.M. Reis(eds.), Differentiation for gifted and talented students(pp. 165-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
  28. Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
  29. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. NY: The Free Press
  30. Witty, P. (1958). Who are the gifted? In H.B. Henry(ed.), Education for the gifted (pp.41-63). 57th Yearbook, Part II. National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press