EFFECTS Of VARIOUS SILANE COUPLING AGENTS ON THE STRENGTH AND THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF GLASS FIBER-ADDED PMMA RESIN

수종의 실란처리 유리섬유를 첨가한 의치상용 레진의 강도변화 및 마모전.후 표면성상분석

  • Lee, Sang-Il (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Whe (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jun (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yun, Suk-Dae (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 이상일 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김창회 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임영준 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김명주 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 윤석대 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2007.08.31

Abstract

Statements of problem: The fracture of acrylic resin dentures remains an unsolved problem. Therefore, many investigations have been performed and various approaches to strengthening acrylic resin, for example, the reinforcement of heat-cured acrylic resin using glass fibers, have been suggested over the years. Silane is important for bonding between glass fiber and resin. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of various silane on the strength of PMMA resin and roughness of resin-glass fiber complex after abrasion test. Material and methods: 3mm glass fiber (Chopped strand, Hankuk fiber Co., Milyang, Korea) was treated with 3 kinds of silane (MPS, EPS, APS) (Sila-ace, Chisso chemical, Tokyo, Japan) and mixed with PMMA resin(Vertex RS, Vertex Dental B.V., Zeist, Netherlands). Transverse strength and Young's modulus was measured using Instron (Instron model 4466, Instron, Massachusetts, USA). After abrasion test (The 858 Mini Bionix II Test System, MTS System Co., Minnesota, USA) surface roughness was evaluated using tester (Form Talysurf plus, Taylor Hopson Ltd., Leicester England). Examination of scanning electron microscope was also performed. Results: Within this study, the following conclusions were drawn. 1. Surface treatment of glass fiber with MPS and APS increased transverse strength of PMMA resin complex, but surface treatment with EPS decreased transverse strength of PMMA resin complex (p<0.05). 2. Silane treated glass fiber increased Young's modulus of PMMA resin complex compared to desized glass fiber (p<0.05). 3. Roughness increased after abrasion test in case of PMMA resin reinforced with desized glass fiber (p<0.05). 4. Roughness change was not observed after abrasion test in case of PMMA resin reinforced with silane treated glass fiber (p>0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Peyton FA. History of resins in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1975:19:211-22
  2. Hargreaves AS. The prevalence of fractured dentures. A survey. Br Dent J 1969:126:451-5
  3. Chow TW. Cheng YY, Ladizesky NH. Polyethylene fibre reinforced poly(methylmethacrylate)-water sorption and dimensional changes during immersion. J Dent 1993:21:367-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90014-H
  4. Chai J, Takahashi Y, Hisama K. Shimizu H. Water sorption and dimensional stability of three glass fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Prosthodont 2004:17: 195-9
  5. Vallitu PK. Acrylic resin-fiber composite-part 2: The effect of polymerization shrinkage of polymethyl methacrylate applied to fiber roving on transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 1994:71:613-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90447-2
  6. Yazdanie N, Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: An investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 1985:54:543-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90431-7
  7. DeBoer J, Vermilyea SG, Brady RE. The effect of carbon fiber orientation on the fatigue resistance and bending properties of two denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1984:51:119-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80117-1
  8. Miyairi H, Nagai M, Takayama Y. Application of carbon fiber(CF)-cloth reinforcement to upper complete denture base. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1983:30:109-17
  9. Berrong JM, Weed RM, Young JM. Fracture resistance of Kevlar-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate)resin : A Preliminary Study. Int J Prosthodont 1990:3:391-5
  10. Mullarky RH. Aramid fiber reinforcement of acrylic appliances. J Clin Orthod 1985:19:655-8
  11. Sehajpal SB. Sood VK. Effect of metal fillers of some physical properties of acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1989:61:746-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(89)80055-1
  12. Braden M. Ladizesky NH. Denture base poly(methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra-high modulus polyethylene fibres. Br Dent J 1998;164:109-13
  13. Ladizesky NH. Chow TW. Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1992:68:934-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90554-N
  14. Gutteridge DL. Reinforcement of poly (methyl methacrylate) with ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fibre. J Dent 1992:20:50-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90012-2
  15. Williamson DL. Boyer DB. Aquilino SA. Leary JM. Effect of polyethylene fiber reinforcement on the strength of denture base resins polymerized by microwave energy. J Prosthet Dent 1994:72:635-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90296-8
  16. Gutteridge DL. The effect of including ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fibre on the impact strength of acrylic resin. Br Dent J 1998;164:177-80
  17. Aydin C. Yilmaz H. Caglar A. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the flexural strength of different denture base resins. Quintessence Int 2002:33:457-63
  18. Jang J. Han S. Mechanical properties of glass-fibre mat/PMMA functionally gradient composites. Composites Part A 1999:30:1045-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00021-4
  19. Karacaer O, Polat TN, Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of length and concentration of glass fibers on the mechanical properties of an injection- and a compression-molded denture base polymer. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:385-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00518-3
  20. Kim SH, Watts DC. The effect of reinforcement with woven E-glass fiber on the impact strength of complete dentures fabricated with high-impact acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2004:91:24-80
  21. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Ban S. Flexural properties of denture base polymers reinforced with a glass cloth-urethane polymer composite. Dent Mater 2004:20:709-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.007
  22. Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Caglar A, Yasar A. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the residual monomer content of two denture base resins. Quintessence Int 2003:34:148-53
  23. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992:8:197-202 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90083-O
  24. Vallittu PK. Comparison of two different silane compounds used for improving adhesion between fibres and acrylic denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 1993:20:533-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01640.x
  25. Solnit GS. The effect of methyl methacrylate reinforcement with silane-treated and untreated glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1991:66:310-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90255-U
  26. Wu HF, Dwight DW, Huff NT. Effects of silane coupling agents on the interphase and performance of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Composite Sci Technol 1997;57:975-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00033-X
  27. Berg J, Jones FR. The role of sizing resins. coupling agents and their blends on the formation of the interphase in glass fibre composites. Composites Part A 1998:29A:1261-72
  28. Lee NJ, Jang J. The use of a mixed coupling agent system to improve the performance of polypropylene-based composites reinforced with short-glass-fiber mat. Composite Sci Technol 1997:57:1559-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00086-9
  29. Bikiaris D. Matzinos P. Larena A, Flaris V. Panayiotou C. Use of silane agents and poly(propylene-g-maleic anhydride) copolymer as adhesion promoters in glass fiber/polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2001:81:701-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1487
  30. Bikiaris D. Matzinos P, Prinos J. Flaris V. Larena A, Panayiotou C. Use of silanes and copolymers as adhesion promoters in glass fiber/polyethylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2001:80:2877-88 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1405
  31. Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 2002:88:485-90 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129303
  32. Debnath S, Wunder SL, McCool JI, Baran GR. Silane treatment effects on glass/resin interfacial shear strengths. Dent Mater 2003:19:441-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00089-1
  33. Sexson JC, Phillips RW. Studies on the effects of abrasives on acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1951: 1 :454-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(51)90031-5
  34. Haselden CA. Hobkirk JA. Pearson GJ. Davies EH. A comparison between wear resistance of 3 type of denture resin to 3 different dentifrices. J Oral Rehabil 1998:25:335-9 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00250.x
  35. Berrigan D. Respiratory cancer and exposure to man-made vitreous fibers : a systemic review. Am J Ind Med 2002:42:354-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10111
  36. International standard ISO 1567, ed 3. 1999(E) 02-15