의치상 레진의 표면 전처리가 연성 이장재와의 인장결합강도에 미치는 영향

EFFECT OF DENTURE BASE SURFACE PRETREATMENTS ON THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN A RESILIENT LINER AND A PROCESSED DENTURE BASE RESIN

  • 윤민철 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 전영찬 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Yoon, Min-Chul (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.10.31

초록

Statement of problem: The failure of adhesion between the resilient denture liner and the denture base is a serious problem in clinic. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of denture base resin surface pretreatments (mechanical and/or chemical) on the tensile bond strength between a resilient liner and processed denture resin. Material and method. Acrylic-based resilient liners (Soft liner; GC co., Japan & Coe-Soft; GC America Inc. USA) and silicone-based resilient liners (Mucosoft, Parkell Inc., USA & Dentusil; Bosworth co., USA) were used. Specimens in each soft lining material were divided two groups with or without mechanical pretreatment. Each denture base specimen received 1 of 4 chemical pretreatments including: (1) no treatment, (2) 30-s acetone treatment, (3) 15-s methylene chloride treatment, (4) 180-s methyl methacrylate treatment. All specimens were thermocycled and placed under tension until failure in a universal testing machine. Results: 1. Silicone-based resilient liners exhibited significantly higher tensile bond strengths than acrylic-based resilient liners (P<.05). 2. Grinding the denture base resin improved tensile bond strengths of silicone-based resilient liners, but reduced tensile bond strengths of acrylic-based resilient liners (P<.05). 3. In acrylic-based resilient liners, treating with acetone significantly increased the bond strength of Soft liner and treating with methyl methacrylate significantly increased the bond strength of Coe-Soft (P<.05). However they were not effective compared to silicone-based resilient liner. 4. In silicone-based resilient liners, treating with all chemical etchants significantly increased the bond strength of Mucosoft to denture base, and treating with methylene chloride and methyl methacrylate increased the bond strength of Dentusil to denture base (P<.05). Conclusion: Although chemical and mechanical pretreatments were not effective on tensile bond strength of acrylic-based resilent liner to denture base, treating the denture base resin surface with appropriate chemical etchants after mechanical pretreatment significantly increased the tensile bond strength of silicone-based resilient liner to denture base.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nikawa H, Iwanaga H, Hamada T, Yuhta S. Effects of denture cleansers on direct soft denture lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 1994:72:657-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90300-X
  2. Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Akmay AE, Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999:15:211-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00038-X
  3. Qudah S, Harrison A, Huggett R. Soft lining materials in prosthetic Dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 1990:3:477-83
  4. Sarac YS. Basoglu T. Ceylan GK. Sarac D. Yapici O. Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004:92:283-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.004
  5. Koh YM, Kwon YH, Kwon TY, Kim KN, Kim GM, Kim GH. et al. Dental materials: Koonja Publishing Inc. :2006. pp.390-5
  6. International Organization for Standardization. ISO. 10139-1. Dentistry-resilient lining materials for removable dentures - part 1: short-term materials. 1st edition. December 1. 1991
  7. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/FDIS 10139-2. Dentistry-Soft lining materials for removable dentures - part 2: materials for long-term use. 10139-2:1999(E)
  8. Garcia LT, Jones JD. Soft liners. Dent Clin N Am 2004:48:709-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.03.001
  9. Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A third, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992:68:368-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90347-D
  10. Kutay O. Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 1994:71:525-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90194-5
  11. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Yapici O, Yuzbasioglu E. The evaluation microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 2006:95:143-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.012
  12. Emmer TJ Jr, Emmer TJ Sr, Vaidynathan J, Vaidynathan TK. Bond strength of permanent soft denture liners bonded to the denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1995:74:595-601 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80311-7
  13. Arima T, Nikawa H, Hamada T, Harsini A. Composion and effect of denture base resin surface primers for reline acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1996:75:457-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90044-X
  14. Jagger RG, al-Athel MS, Jagger DC, Vowles RW. Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material. Int J Prosthodont 2002:15:55-8
  15. Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc 1961:63:382-90 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1961.0218
  16. Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981:9:336-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(81)90007-5
  17. Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1997:78:153-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70119-7
  18. Mack PJ. Denture soft linings: materials available. Australian Dental Journal 1989:34:517-21 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1989.tb04657.x
  19. O'brien, WJ. Dental materials: properties and selection. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.:1989. pp. 170-3
  20. Kim YM, Bae JS. The study on the physical property of the permanent soft denture liners. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1999:37:809-17
  21. Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003:89:303-10 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.41
  22. Polyzois GL. Adhesion properties of resilient lining materials bonded to light-cured denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992:68:854-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90216-W
  23. Bates JF. Smith DC. Evaluation of indirect resilient liners for dentures: laboratory and clinical tests. J Am Dent Assoc 1965:70:344-53 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1965.0286
  24. McMordie R, King GE. Evaluation of primers used for bonding silicone to denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989:61:636-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90292-8
  25. Davis DM. Carmichael RP. The plasticizing effect of temporary soft lining materials on polymerized acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1988:60:463-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90249-1
  26. Kim KN, Craig RG. Koran A. Viscosity of monophase addition silicones as a function of shear rate. J Prosthet Dent 1992:67:794-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90585-X
  27. Wright PS. Composition and properties of soft lining materials for acrylic dentures. J Dent 1981:9:210-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(81)90057-9