The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

THE EFFECT OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF RETENTION ELEMENT ON COMPOSITE TO METAL BOND STRENGTH

유지요소의 크기와 형태가 간접복합레진과 금속간의 결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Yun-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 이윤정 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 전영찬 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2007.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of sire and shape of retention element on the bond strength of indirect composite resin and metal. Material and method: The metal disk specimens, each 6mm in diameter, were cast from CrCo alloy. They were divided into 8 groups by applied retention element. retention bead group $B2\;({\phi}\;0.2mm),\;B4\;({\phi}\;0.4mm),\;B6\;({\phi}\;0.6mm),\;B8\;({\phi}\;0.8mm)$, retention crystal group C2 (0.2mm), C5 (0.5mm), C8 (0.8mm) and sandblasting group SB ($110{\mu}m\;Al_2O_3$ blasting) as control. Eighty-eight metal specimens were veneered with $TESCERA^{(R)}$ Indirect resin system. One specimen of each group was sectioned and the resin-metal bonding pattern at the interface was observed under measuring microscope. Other specimens were then tested for tensile bond strength on an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2mm/min. Results: 1. Compared to sandblasting, beads or crystals increased the resin-metal bond strength (P<.05). 2. 0.2mm retention crystals were most effective in improving the resin-metal bond strength (P>.05). 3. 0.2mm beads showed the highest bond strength among retention bead groups, but there was no statistically significant difference (P>.05). 4. Retention crystals tend to be higher in bond strength than retention beads due to wider surface area. 5. The larger retention element, the larger the undercut for the mechanical retention, but the gap at resin-metal interface was also increased. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, 0.2mm retention crystals were most effective in improving the resin-metal bond strength.

Keywords

References

  1. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997:9:108-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  2. Cesar PF, Miranda WG, Braga RR. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength. flexural mod ul us. and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001:86:289-96 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114513
  3. Setz J, Engel E. In vivo color stability of resin-veneered telescopic dentures: a double blind pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1997:77:486-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70141-0
  4. Kountouras CG. Howlett JA, Pearson GJ. Flexural and thermal cycling of resins for veneering removable overlay dentures. J Dent 1999:27:367-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00039-6
  5. Lee CF, Pierpont HP, Strichler ER. The effect of bead attachment systems on cast ing patterns and resultant tensile bond strength of composite resin veneer cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991:66:623-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90442-Y
  6. Matsumura H, Kawahara M, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Surface preparations for metal frameworks of composite resin veneered prostheses made with an adhesive opaque resin. J Prosthet Dent 1991:66:10-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90343-U
  7. Berge M. Properties of prosthetic resin-veneer materials processed in commercial laboratories. Dent Mater 1989:5:77-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90134-6
  8. Ishijima T, Caputo AA, Mito R. Adhesion of resin to casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1992:67:445-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90070-Q
  9. Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001:86:315-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114823
  10. Watanabe I, Kurtz KS, Kabcenell JL, Okabe T. Effect of sandblasting and silicoating on bond strength of polymer-glass composite to cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1999:82:462-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70035-1
  11. Robin C, Scherrer SS, Wiskott HWA, Rijk WG, Belser UC. Weibull parameters of composite resin bond strengths to porcelain and noble alloy using the Rocatec system. Dent Mater 2002:18:389-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00062-8
  12. Kourtis SG. Bond strength of resin-to-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1997:78:136-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70117-3
  13. Nicholls JI, Shue SL. Effect of bead spacing on the tensile bond strength of resin veneers to cast alloys. Quint Dent Technol 1986:10:511-5
  14. Sheu SL, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD. The effect of metal retentive designs on resin veneer retention. J Prosthet Dent 1987:58:297-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90044-8
  15. Lin TH, Chang HJ, Chung KH. Interfacial strengths of various alloy surface treatments for resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990:64:158-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90171-8
  16. Hudgins JL, Moon PC, Knap FJ. Particle-roughened resin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1985:53:471-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90627-4
  17. Barzilay I. Myers ML. Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surface. J Prosthet Dent 1988:59:131-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90001-7
  18. Laufer BZ, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD. SiOx-C coating: A composite-to-metal bonding mechanism. J Prosthet Dent 1988:60:320-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90277-6
  19. Jones RM, Moore BK, Goodacre CJ, Munoz-Viveros CA. Microleakage and shear bond strength of resin and porcelain veneers bonded to cast alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991:65:221-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90165-S
  20. Tarozzo LSA, Mattos MGC, Ribeiro RF, Semprini M. Comparison of retentive systems for composites used as alternatives to porcelain in fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003:89:572-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00180-X
  21. Ohno H, Araki Y, Sagara M. The adhesion mechanism of dental adhesive resin to the alloy-relationship between Co-Cr alloy surface structure analyzed by ESCA and bonding strength of adhesive resin. Dent Mater 1986:5:46-65 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.5.46
  22. Yamauchi J, Omura I, Harada I. Adhesive and mechanical properties of a new dental adhesive. J Dent Res 1984:63:314-21
  23. Caeg C, Leinfelder KF, Lacefield WR, Bell W. Effectiveness of a method used in bonding resins to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1990:64:37-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90150-B
  24. Tanaka T, Atsuta M, Uchiyama Y, Nakabayashi N, Masuhara E. Spherical powder for retaining thermosetting acrylic resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1978:39:295-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80100-0