Journal of the Korean earth science society (한국지구과학회지)

The Korean Earth Science Society (한국지구과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Student Learning: Using a Standard-Based Earth Science Curriculum in the U.S.

  • Park, Do-Yong (Science Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Illinois State University)
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of EarthComm implementation in the U.S. high schools in terms of demographic background including school size, urban/rural area, and teachers' teaching experiences. In addition, this study examined impact of students' higher-order thinking skills by using the visions of National Science Education Standards. Two modular of the EarthComm curriculum were used for this purpose with thirty one teachers and around thousand students involved across four states. Findings were that EarthComm did not significantly impact student achievement differentially in schools of varying sizes and school location, i.e., urban and rural areas. The years of teaching experiences did not impact student achievement scores for Module I but did significantly impact for Module II. It is noted that the two results seemingly conflict with each other similar to other research findings (Ferguson, 1998; Yager et al., 1988). Student higher-order thinking skills, on the other hand, were significantly improved as a result of studying with EarthComm. Implications were discussed at the end of the paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajeyalemi, D.A., 1993, Teacher Strategies Used by Exemplary STS Teachers. In Yager R.E. (ed.), What Research Says To the Science Teacher, Vol. 7: The Science, Technology, Society Movement (49-52). Washington, D.C.: The National Science Teachers Association
  2. Aikenhead, G.S., 1988, Teaching Science Through a Science-Technology-Society-Environment Approach: An Instruction Guide. SIDRU Research Report No. 12. Saskatchewan, Canada: Institutional Development and Research Unit, Regina University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 323 111)
  3. American Geological Institute., 1999, Earth System Science in the Community (EarthComm), Washington, D.C
  4. Ebel, R.L., 1956, An Outline for a Course in the Construction and Use of Classroom Tests. The State University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  5. Ebel, R.L. and Frisbie, D.A., 1991, Essentials of Educational Measurement, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, Inc., NJ, USA
  6. Exline, J.D., 1998, The National Survey with Respect to Earth Science Education at State, District, and School Levels. Paper presented at the American Geological Institute Conference, Toronto, Canada
  7. Ferguson, R.F., 1998, Can Schools Narrow the Black-White Test Score Gap? In Jencks, C. and Phillips, M. (eds.). The Black-White Test Score Gap (318-374). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press
  8. Hinkle, D.E., Wiersma, W., and Jurs, S.G., 1979, Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Rand McNally College Publishing Co., Chicago, USA
  9. Hurd, P.D., 1992, Achieving Reforms in Science Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
  10. National Research Council., 1996, National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: Author
  11. Park, D., 2006, Curriculum Reform Movement of Science Education in the U.S.: A Case of Earth Science Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27 (7), 730-744
  12. Park, D., 2005, Differences between a Standards-Based Curriculum and Traditional Textbooks in High School Earth Science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53 (5), 540-547 https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.5.540
  13. Park, D., Yager, R, and Smith, M., 2005, Implementing EarthComm: Teacher Professional Development and Its Impact on Student Achievement Scores in a Standards-Based Earth Science Curriculum. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 9 (3). [Online]. Available: http:// wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/ejsev9n3.html [2005, March]
  14. Tobin, K.G. and Fraser, B.J., 1990, What Does It Mean To Be an Exemplary Science Teacher? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (1), 3-25 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270103
  15. Weiss, I.R., 1993, Science Teachers Rely on the Textbook. In Yager, RE. (Ed.) What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Volume Seven: The Science, Technology, Society Movement. Washington D.C.: NSTA
  16. Yager, R.E., Hidayat, E.M., and Penick J.E., 1988, Features Which Separate Least Effective from Most Effective Science Teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25 (3), 165-177 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250302