Ischial Pressure Sore Reconstruction Using Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap

아래볼기동맥 관통가지피판을 이용한 궁둥 욕창의 치료

  • Kim, Young Seok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Jong Wha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Won Jai (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Tark, Kwan Chul (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 김영석 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실, 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 강종화 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실, 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 이원재 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실, 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 탁관철 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실, 인체조직복원연구소)
  • Received : 2006.10.09
  • Published : 2007.03.10

Abstract

Purpose: The ischial area is by far the most common site of pressure sores found in wheel chair bound paraplegic patients, because greatest pressure is exerted from the body on this area in a sitting position. Even after a series of successful pressure sore treatments, the site is very prone to relapse by the simplest ordinary tasks of everyday life. Therefore, it is crucial to preserve the main pedicle during primary surgery. Various surgical procedures employed to treat pressure sores such as myocutaneous flap and perforator flap have been introduced. After introduction of ischial sore treatment using the inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) has been made, the authors experienced favorable clinical results of patients who have undergone IGAP flap procedure in a three year time period. Methods: A total of 17 patients received IGAP flap surgery in our hospital from January 2003 to May 2006, among which 14 of them being males and 3 females. Surgery was performed on the same site again in 6(35%) patients who had originally relapsed after receiving the conventional method of pressure sore surgery. Patients' average age was 49.4(27-71) years old. Most of the patients were paraplegic(11 cases, 65%) and others were either quadriplegic(4 cases, 23%) or ambulatory(2 cases, 12%). Based on hospital records and clinical photographs, we have attempted to assess the feasibility and practicability of the IGAP flap procedure through comparative analysis of several parameters: size of defective area, treatment modalities, occurrence of relapses, complications, and postoperative treatments. Results: The average follow-up duration of 17 subjects was 25.4 months(5-42 months). All flaps survived without any necrosis. Six cases were relapsed cases from conventional surgical procedures. All of them healed well during our follow-up study. Postoperative complications such as wound dehiscence and fistula developed in some subjects, but all were well healed through secondary treatment. A total of 2 cases relapsed after surgery. Conclusion: The inferior gluteal artery perforator flap is an effective method that can be primarily applied in replacement to the conventional ischial pressure sore reconstructive surgery owing to its many advantages: ability to preserve peripheral muscle tissue, numerous possible flap designs, relatively good durability, and the low donor site morbidity rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Foster RD: Pressure sores. In Mathes SJ. (Ed): Plastic Surgery. 2nd Ed, Vol 6. Philadelphia, Saunders/Elsevier, 2006, p 1321
  2. Foster RD, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Hoffman WY: Ischial pressure sore coverage: a rationale for flap selection. Br J Plast Surg 50: 374, 1997
  3. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A: The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 91: 678, 1993
  4. Higgins JP, Orlando GS, Blondeel PN: Ischial pressure sore reconstruction using an inferior gluteal artery perforator(IGAP) flap. Br J Plast Surg 55: 83, 2002
  5. Goodman CM, Cohen V Armenta A, Thomby J, Netscher DT: Evaluation of results and treatment variables for pressure ulcers in 48 veteran spinal cord-injured patients. Ann Plast Surg 42: 665, 1999
  6. Kiemey PC, Engrav LH, Isik FF, Esselman PC, Cardenas DD, Rand RP: Results of 268 pressure sores in 158 patients managed jointly by plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 765, 1998
  7. Stevenson TR, Polloc RA, Rohrich RJ, VanderKolk CA: The gluteus maximus musculocutaneous island flap: refinements in design and application. Plast Reconstr Surg 79: 761, 1987
  8. Ao M, Mae O, Namba Y, Asagoe K: Perforator-based flap for coverage of lumbosacral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 987, 1998
  9. Roche NA, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel PN, Matton G, Monstrey SJ: The use of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects. Ann Plast Surg 45:7, 2000
  10. Co?kunfirat OK, ?xgenta? HE: Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations. Plast Reconstr Surg 113: 2012, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122215.48226.3F
  11. Kankaya Y, Ulusoy G, Oruc M, Yildiz K, Kacer U, Tuccar E: Perforating arteries of the gluteal region:Anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 56: 409, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000200775.56263.2d
  12. Song WC, Bae SM, Lee BY, Han SH, Koh KS: An anatomical study of the superior and inferior gluteal arteries supplying gluteus maximus for musculocutaneous flaps. Korean J Phys Anthropol 15: 149, 2002