The Earthquake Response Characteristics and Seismic Safety Evaluation of Steel Cable Stayed Bridges

강사장교의 지진응답특성 및 내진 안전성 평가

  • Received : 2006.04.27
  • Accepted : 2007.10.04
  • Published : 2007.10.27

Abstract

In this study, we demonstrated the characteristics of the near-fault ground motion thatwas not considered in the domestic seismic design code and how the effect of the near-fault ground motion affects the response of cable-stayed bridges. Afterselecting the actual measurement records of the typical near- and far-fault ground motion, the characteristics of ground motion is analyzed using the elastic and inelastic response spectrum. Analyzing the response regarding the earthquake's characteristics on cable-stayed bridges by the typical three-type cable-stayed bridges and the actual cable-stayed bridge, the characteristics of responses about main members are compared and analyzed. Moreover,reliability analysis is accomplished using the results of the seismic response analysis, and the seismic safety of the cable-stayed bridges is evaluated quantitatively as a reliability index and probability of failure. According to the results of the response spectrum, the earthquake response analysis and the reliability analysis, because the effect of the near fault ground motion against the response of cable-stayed bridges is different from the effect of the existing far-fault ground motion, it should be considered as an important factor when designing cable-stayed bridges.

본 연구에서는 국내 내진 설계규정에서 고려하고 있지 않은 근거리지진의 특성을 규명하고, 사장교 구조물에 미치는 영향을 검토하고자 한다. 대표적인 근거리 및 원거리지진의 실측자료를 선정한 후, 탄성 및 비탄성응답스펙트럼을 작성하여 지진기록의 특성을 분석하였다. 세 가지 형식의 사장교 및 실제 사장교 구조물을 대상으로 지진특성에 따른 응답해석을 수행하여 주요부재에 대한 응답특성을 비교 분석하였다. 또한 지진응답해석 결과를 이용하여 신뢰성해석을 수행하였으며, 신뢰성지수 및 파괴확률을 검토함으로써 대상 사장교 구조물의 내진 안전성을 정량적으로 평가하였다. 응답스펙트럼, 지진응답해석 및 신뢰성해석 결과에 의하면 근거리지진이 사장교 응답에 대한 영향은 기존의 원거리지진과는 상이한 양상을 보이고 있으므로, 사장교 구조물 설계 시 중요한 인자로 고려해야 할 것을 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 학술진흥재단

References

  1. 건설교통부(1993) 진도대교 안전진단 보고서
  2. 건설교통부(1993) 진도대교 안전진단, 한국건설기술연구원, 한양대학교 산업과 학연구소
  3. 건설교통부(1996) 도로교 표준시방서
  4. 변윤주, 김우종(1991) 강사장교의 설계와 시공, 한국강구조학회지, 제3권, 제2호, pp. 18-30
  5. 이진옥(1993) 지진하중을 받는 강아치교의 동적 비탄성 응답 해석, 고려대학교 박사학위논문
  6. 한국수력원자력(주)(2002) 원전부지 지진안전성 정밀평가 기술 개발
  7. 한성호, 신재철(2005) 지진하중을 받는 사장교의 확률유한 요소 해석 및 신뢰성해석, 한국전산구조공학회논문집, Vol. 18. No. 1, pp. 29-42
  8. 한성호, 신재철(2006) 근거리 지진을 받는 현수교의 지진응답특성 및 신뢰성해석, 대한토목학회논문집, Vol. 25. No. 6A, pp. 969-979
  9. 홍순규, 한성호, 신재철(2004) 근거리지진을 이용한 강사장교의 동적응답에 관한 연구, 대한토목학회 정기학술대회논문집, pp. 1986-1991
  10. Alavi B. and Krawinker H. (2001), Effects of Near-Field Ground Motion on Building Structures, CUREE-Kajima Joint Research Program Phase III
  11. Bolt B. A. (1997) Discussions of Enduring Lessons and Opportunities Lost from the San Fernando Earthquake of February 9, 1971, by Paul C. Jennings, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 545-547, EERI, Oakland, CA https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585963
  12. Chopra A. K. (1995) Dynamics of Structures : Theory ?and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc
  13. Hasofer, A. M. and Lind, N. C. (1974) Exact and Invariant Second Moment Code Format, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. EMI, pp.111-121
  14. Jennings P. C. (1997) Enduring Lessons and Opportunities Lost from the San Fernando Earthquake of February 9, 1971, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25-53, EERI, Oakland, CA https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585930
  15. Mahin S. A. and Lin J. (1983) Construction of Inelastic Response Spectra for Single-Degree-of -Freedom Systems, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, California, Report No. UCB/ EERC- 83/17
  16. Malhotra P. K. (1999) Response of Buildings to Near Field Pulse Like Ground Motions, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, pp. 1309-1326 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1309::AID-EQE868>3.0.CO;2-U
  17. Mehmet Inel, Erich M. Bretz, Edgar F. Black et al (2001) USEE 2001 : Utility Software for Earthquake Engineering Report and Users Manual, Mid America Earthquake Center
  18. Somerville P. G. (2000) Characterization of Near Fault Ground Motions, U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Effects of Near Field Earthquake Shaking, San Francisco, California, pp. 21-29
  19. Rackwitz, R. and Fiessler, B. (1978) Structural Reliability Under Combined Random Load Sequences, Computers and Structures, Vol. 9, No.5, pp. 489-494 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9
  20. Rao P. B. and Jangid R. S. (2001) Performance of Sliding Systems under Near-Fault Motions, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 203
  21. Wang Guo-Quart, Zhou Xi-Yuan, Ma Zong-Jin, (1999) Corrected Near Fault Recordings Caused by the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 9, No.5, attached CD-ROM, under the directory, Wang G. Q
  22. Wang, P. H., Tseng, T. C., Yang, C. G. (1993) Initial Shape of Cable-Stayed Bridges, Computers and Structures, Vol. 46, No.6, pp. 1095-1106 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90095-U