능력별 집단편성에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식

A Study of Recognition About Students' Ability Grouping

  • 투고 : 2007.07.09
  • 심사 : 2007.12.06
  • 발행 : 2007.12.31

초록

According to the paradigm of Neo-liberalism, the issue of ability grouping has grown more and more in education of Korea. And because of the influence of ability grouping, now ability grouping is enforcing partially in the subjects of English and Mathematics. But ability grouping is going to expand to the all subjects. So, it is very important that how teachers and students are recognize about partial ability grouping in the subjects of English and Mathematics. Because that information about partial ability grouping can guide direction for the future educational policy. The purpose of this study was to actually analyze teacher's and students' recognition of partial ability grouping in the subjects of English and Mathematics. To accomplish this purpose, 622 middles school students and 552 teachers were sampled. As a tool of investigation, questionnaires about teacher's and students' recognition of partial ability grouping had made by researcher of this study were used. And as processing of data, t-test, F-test, Scheff-test were used. The result of this study is as follow. First, teachers who are experiencing ability grouping recognized more negative about ability grouping than teachers who are not experiencing ability grouping. Second, students who have low ability recognized more negative about ability grouping than students who have high ability. Third, teachers who are experiencing ability grouping recognized more ineffective about ability grouping than teachers who are not experiencing ability grouping. Fourth, students who have low ability recognized more ineffective about ability grouping than students who have high ability.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 부산외국어대학교

참고문헌

  1. 김달효(2006). 능력별 집단편성의 비판적 이해. 서울: 시그마프레스
  2. 김영철 등(1995). 고등학교 평준화 정책의 개선 방안. 한국교육개발원
  3. 김홍원 등(2004). 수준별 이동수업 내실화 방안 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구보고서
  4. 박소영(2001). 중학교 수준별 수업 운영 실태에 관한 교사 인식 조사. 교육과정연구. 19(2). 95-117
  5. 배정애(2001). 중학교 수준별 교육에 대한 교사․학생의 인식 비교․분석. 경성대학교 석사학위논문
  6. 성기선․강태중(2001). 평준화 정책과 지적 수월성 교육의 관계에 대한 실증적 검토. KEDI 교육정책포럼-한국교육의 현실과 대안(2). 한국교육개발원
  7. 중앙교육진흥연구소(2001). 일반계 고등학교의 학교별 교육효과 분석. 중앙교육진흥연구소
  8. Boaler, J., William, D., & Brown, M.(2000). Students' experiences of ability grouping: disaffection, polarization and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal. 26(5). 631-648 https://doi.org/10.1080/713651583
  9. Clammer, R.(1985). Mixed ability teaching: meanings and motives. A study of two geography departments. SERCH. 7, 17-19
  10. Dawson, M. M.(1987). Beyond ability grouping: a review of the effectiveness of ability grouping and its alternatives. School Psychology Review. 16(3). 348-369
  11. Finley, M. K.(1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school. Sociology of Education. 57. 233-243 https://doi.org/10.2307/2112427
  12. Gamoran, A., & Berends, M.(1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research. 57. 415-435 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057004415
  13. George, P. S.(1993). Tracking and ability grouping in the middle school: ten tentative truths. Middle School Journal. 24. 17-24 https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1993.11495369
  14. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S.(2001). Ability grouping in education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing
  15. Loveless, T.(1999). The tracking wars. Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution Press
  16. Oakes, J.(1985). Keeping track: how schools structure inequality. New York: Yale University Press
  17. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R.(1992). Curriculum differentiation: opportunities, consequences and meaning. In P. Jackson. (ed). Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan
  18. Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E.(1995). Heterogeneous grouping as an element of cooperative learning in an elementary education science course. School Science & Mathematics. 95(8). 401-408 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb10192.x