Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Processing Method on Performance and Nutrient Digestibility in Growing-finishing Pigs Fed Lupine Seeds

  • Yang, Y.X. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Y.G. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Heo, S. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ohh, S.J. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Chae, B.J. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2006.10.25
  • Accepted : 2007.04.05
  • Published : 2007.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Three trials were conducted to study the effect of processing method on performance, apparent nutrient and amino acid digestibilities in growing-finishing pigs fed lupine seeds. Ground, expanded or flaked lupine seed was prepared for the trials. In trial 1, a total of 72 growing barrows ($Landrace{\times}Large$ $White{\times}Large$, initial BW of $54.22{\pm}5.87$ kg) were allocated to three treatment diets containing 15% percent of differently processed lupine seed for 28 days. Each treatment had four replicates comprising 6 pigs each. In trial 2, a total of 48 finishing barrows ($Landrace{\times}Large$ $White{\times}Large$, initial BW of $84.40{\pm}6.84$ kg) were subjected to three treatments for 21 days. The experimental design was the same as trial 1 except for supplementation with 20% of lupine seed. Each treatment had four replicates comprising 4 pigs each. To evaluate the ileal digestibility of amino acids, a total of 9 barrows ($Landrace{\times}Large$ $White{\times}Large$), with an average initial BW of $41.07{\pm}1.98$ kg, were fed with ground, expanded or flaked lupine for 7 days. Each pig was surgically equipped with a simple T-cannula fitted in the distal ileum. Amino acid composition and presence of anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) in processed lupine sources were also evaluated. The results showed that there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in lupine amino acid composition due to the different processing methods. Expanded and flaked lupine significantly decreased (p<0.05) the concentration of ANFs compared with ground lupine. There was no effect (p>0.05) on the growth performance in growing pigs. However, processing method had a significant effect (p<0.05) on average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) in finishing pigs. There was no effect (p>0.05) of the different processing methods on the digestibility of dry matter (DM), gross energy (GE), ether extract (EE), Calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), but expanded lupine could significantly increase (p<0.05) the apparent digestibility of CP in finishing pigs. Furthermore, expanded lupine had a higher (p<0.05) apparent ileal digestibility for most indispensable and dispensable amino acids compared with ground and flaked lupine. It was concluded that expanded lupine could be beneficial in improving lupine's quality and improve performance and nutrient utilization in growing-finishing pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. Aldo Prandini, Mauro Morlacchini, Maurizio Moschini,Giorgio Fusconi, Francesco Masoero and Gianfranco Piva. 2005. Raw and extruded pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lupin (Lupinus albus var. Multitalia) seeds as protein sources in weaned piglets' diets: effect on growth rate and blood parameters. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 4:385-394. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2005.385
  2. Alonso, R., A. Aguirre and F. Marzo. 2000b. Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chem. 68:159-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00169-7
  3. Alonso, R., E. Orue and F. Marzo. 1998. Effects of extrusion and conventional processing methods on protein and antinutritional factor contents in pea seeds. Food Chem. 63:505-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00037-5
  4. Alonso, R., G. Grant, P. Dewey and F. Marzo. 2000a. Nutritional assessment in vitro and in vivo of raw and extruded peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2286-2290. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000095o
  5. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, Virginia.
  6. Batterham, E. S., L. M. Anderson, R. F. Lowe and R. E. Darnell. 1986. Nutritional value of lupin (Lupinus albus) seed meal for growing pigs, availability of lysine, effect of autoclaving and net energy content. Br. J. Nutr. 56:645-659. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19860145
  7. Blethen, D. B., J. E. Wohlt, D. K. Jasaitis and J. L. Evans. 1990. Feed protein fractions: relationship to nitrogen solubility and degradability. J. Dairy Sci. 73:1544-1551. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78823-6
  8. Casiraghi, M. C., F. Brighenti, N. Pellegrini, E. Leopardi and G. Testolin. 1993. Effect of processing on rice starch digestibility evaluated by in vivo and in vitro methods. J. Cereal Sci. 17:147-156. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1993.1015
  9. Cros, P., R. Moncoulon, C. Bayourthe and M. Vernay. 1992. Effect of extrusion on ruminal and intestinal disappearance of amino acids in white lupin seed. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72:89-96. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas92-010
  10. Cuadra, C. de la, M. Muzquiz, C. Burbano, G. Ayet, R. Calvo, A. Osagie and C. Cuadrado. 1994. Alkaloid, alpha-galactoside and phytic acid changes in germinating lupin seed. J. Sci. Food Agric. 66:357-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740660313
  11. Dunshea, F. R., N. J. Gannon, R. J. van Barneveld, B. P. Mullan, R. G. Campbell and R. H. King. 2001. Dietary lupins (Lupinus angustifolius and Lupinus albus) can increase digesta retention in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52:593-602. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR00081
  12. Duranti, M. and P. Cerletti. 1979. Amino acid composition of seed proteins of Lupinus albus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:977-978. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60225a038
  13. Fan, M. Z., W. C. Sauer and C. F. M. de Lange. 1995. Amino acid digestibility in soybean meal, extruded soybean and full-fat canola for early-weaned pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 52:189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00732-O
  14. Fernández, J. A. and E. S. Batterham. 1995. The nutritive value of lupin-seed and dehulled lupin-seed meals as protein sources for growing pigs as evaluated by different techniques. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 53:279-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00743-S
  15. Gdala, J., A. J. M. Jansman, L. Buraczewska, J. Huisman and P. van Leeuwen. 1997. The influence of $\alpha$-galactosidase supplementation on the ileal digestibility of lupin seed carbohydrates and dietary protein in young pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 67:115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00003-5
  16. Gdala, J., A. J. M. Jansman, P. van Leeuwen, J. Huisman and M. W. A. Verstegen. 1996. Lupins (L. luteus, L. albus, L. angustifolius) as a protein source for young pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 62:239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(96)00992-3
  17. Gilbert, R. 1998. Expanding soybeans minimises ANFs. Feed Technol. 2:19.
  18. Henson, P. R. and J. L. Stephens. 1958. Lupines culture and use. USDA Farmers Bull. 2114.
  19. Hove, E. L. 1974. Composition and protein quality of sweet lupine seed. J. Sci. Food Agric. 25:851. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740250715
  20. King, R. H. 1981. Lupin seed meal (Lupinus albus cv. Hamburg) as a source of protein for growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 6:285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(81)90007-9
  21. Kung, L., Jr., K. Maciorowski, K. M. Powell, S. Weidner and C. L. Eley. 1991. Lupin as a protein supplement for growing lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3398-3405. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6983398x
  22. Kwak, B. O., H. J. Kim and H. S. Park. 2000. The effect of different lupin kernel inclusion levels on the growth and carcass composition of growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:207-212. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.207
  23. Lee, C. H. and J. K Kim. 1985. Microstructure of lupin seed: a comparative study with soybean. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 17:454-459.
  24. Li, J. Y., A. I. Yeh and K. L. Fan. 2007. Gelation characteristics and morphology of corn starch/soy protein concentrate composites during heating. J. Food Engineering. 78:1240-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.12.043
  25. Mariscal-Landín, G., Y. Lebreton and B. Seve. 2002. Apparent and standardised true ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids from faba bean, lupin and pea, provided as whole seeds, dehulled or extruded in pig diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 97:183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00354-6
  26. Moore, S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 238:235-237.
  27. Moss, A. R., D. I. Givens, H. F. Grundy and K. P. A. Wheeler. 1997. The nutritive value for ruminants of lupin seeds from determinate plants and their replacement of soya bean meal in diets for young growing cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 68:11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00041-2
  28. NRC. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine (10th Ed). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  29. Panda, A. K., V. R. B. Sastry, A. Kumar and S. K. Saha. 2006. Quantification of karanjin, tannin and trypsin inhibitors in raw and detoxified expeller and solvent extracted karanj (Pongamia glabra) cake. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1776-1783.
  30. Perez-Conesa, D., G. Ros and M. J. Periago. 2002. Protein nutritional quality of infant cereals during processing. J. Cereal Sci. 36:125-133. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2002.0463
  31. Perez-Maldonado, R. A., P. F. Mannion and D. J. Farrell. 1998. Practical levels of inclusion of four grain legumes in broiler diets in a large-scale experiment. Proc. Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp. 10:144-147.
  32. Petterson, D. S. 2000. The use of lupins in feeding systems- Review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:861-882. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.861
  33. Qin, G., F. R. ter Elst, M. W. Bosch and A. F. B. van der Poel. 1996. Thermal processing of whole soya beans: Studies on the inactivation of antinutritional factors and effects on ileal digestibility in piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00863-2
  34. SAS Institute. 1996. SAS User's Guide. Version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary. NC.
  35. Swiech, E., L. Buraczewska and M. Taciak. 2004. In vivo and in vitro ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids of peas containing different tannin levels (Ed. M. Muzquiz, G. D. Hill, C. Cuadrado, M. M. Pedrosa and C. Burbano) Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume seeds and oilseeds, EAAP Publication No. 110, Toledo, Spain, 8-10 March 2004, Wageningen Academic Publishers, 243-246.
  36. Szarvas, S. R., R. J. van Barneveld, N. J. Gannon, F. R. Dunshea and G. F. Wyatt. 1999. Isolated lupin non-starch polysaccharides in sorghum-based diets do not influence endogenous nitrogen losses from growing pigs. In Manipulating Pig Production VII, ed. P.D. Cranwell, Australasian Pig Science Association Conference, Werribee, Australia, 271.
  37. Ure, A. L., T. R. Dhiman, M. D. Stern and K. C. Olson. 2005. Treated extruded soybean meal as a source of fat and protein for dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:980-989. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.980
  38. Valdebouze, P., E. Bergeron, T. Garborit and J. Delort-Laval. 1980. Content and distribution of trypsin inhibitors and hemagglutinins in some legume seeds. Can J. Plant Sci. 60:695-701. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps80-097
  39. van Barneveld, R. J. 1999. Chemical and physical characteristics of grains related to variability in energy and amino acid availability in pigs: A review. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50:667-688. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR98160
  40. van Barneveld, R. J., J. Baker, S. R. Szarvas and M. Choct. 1995. Effect of lupin kernel inclusion on the ileal digestibility of amino acids by growing pigs. In Manipulating Pig Production V, (Ed. D. P. Hennessy and P. Cranwell). Australasian Pig Science Association Conference, Canberra, Australia, 29.
  41. van Barneveld, R. J., L. E. Olsen and M. Choct. 1997. Lupin oligosaccharides depress the apparent ileal digestion of amino acids by growing pigs. In Manipulating Pig Production VI. Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Conference of the Australian Pig Science Association (Ed. P. Cranwell). Canberra, Australia, 230.
  42. Varasundharosoth, D. and M. F. Barnes. 1985. Protein fractions of lupine seed meal: Quantitative importance and amino acid composition. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 8:71-80.
  43. Walhain, P., M. Foucart and A. Thewis. 1992. Influence of extrusion on ruminal and intestinal disappearance in sacco of pea (Pisum sativum L.) proteins and starch. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 38:43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90075-H
  44. Walker, W. R., G. L. Morgan and C. V. Maxwell. 1986. Ileal cannulation in baby pigs with a simple T-cannula. J. Anim. Sci. 62:407-411.
  45. Wigan, G. C., E. S. Batterham and D. J. Farrell. 1995. Nutritive value of L. angustifolius (cv. Gungurru) for growing pigs. In: Manipulating Pig Production V: Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Conference of the Australasian Pig Science Association (Ed. D. P. Hennessy and P. D. Cranwell). Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee. 38-46.
  46. Yuno-Ohta, N., H. Maeda, M. Okada and K. Hasegawa. 1992. Formation of transparent gels of sesame 13S globulin: Effects of fatty acid salts. J. Food Sci. 57:86-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb05431.x

Cited by

  1. Effects of expanded diets and phase feeding programme on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1448822