대한산업공학회지 (Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)

  • 제33권1호
  • /
  • Pages.61-69
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-0988(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6457(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지

결합 중요도를 이용한 사후보수 우선순위 결정

Determination of Corrective Maintenance Priorities Using Joint Reliability Importance

  • 구훈영 (한국전자통신연구원) ;
  • 김영복 (서울대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 홍정식 (서울산업대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 이창훈 (서울대학교 산업공학과)
  • Koo, Hoon Young (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Young Bok (Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, Jung Sik (Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University of Technology) ;
  • Lie, Chang Hoon (Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In a large complex system, maintenance priorities for the failed components are important to maintain the sys-tern reliability at required level. Commonly used methods of determining maintenance priorities are based onranking the failed components by using reliability importance measures such as Birnbaum reliability importance,risk achievement worth and F-V importance, etc. In the preceding works, maintenance priorities for the failedcomponents are determined by using such existing measures, In this study, a new method of determining main-tenance priorities, which utilizes the joint reliability importance is proposed. By investigating the sign of thejoint reliability importance, maintenance priorities obtained by the existing methods are adjusted to yield new re-vised priorities. The revised maintenance priorities are shown to be more effective than the existing ones fromthe standpoint of the speed of system recovery, Effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated by numericalexamples.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Armstrong, M. J. (1995), Joint reliability importance of components, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 44, 408-412 https://doi.org/10.1109/24.406574
  2. Armstrong, M. J. (1997), Reliability-Importance and Dual FailureMode Components, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 46, 212-221 https://doi.org/10.1109/24.589949
  3. Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1975), Importance of system components and fault tree events, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 3, 153-173 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4149(75)90013-7
  4. Birnbaum, Z. W. (1969), On the importance of different components in a muliicomponents system, Multivariate Analysis-II, Academic Press, New York, 581-592
  5. Boland, P. J. and El-Neweihi, E. (1995), Measures of component, 455-463
  6. Borgonovo, E, Apostolakis, G. E., Tarantola, S. and Saltelli, A. (2003), Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques and importance measures in PSA, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 79, 175-185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00228-4
  7. Borst, M. V. D. and Schoonakker, H. (2001), An overview of PSA importance measures, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72, 241-245 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00007-2
  8. Hong, J. S. and Lie, C. H. (1993), Joint reliability-importance of two edges in an undirected network, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 42, 17-23 https://doi.org/10.1109/24.210266
  9. Jung, K. H., H. Kim and Ko, Y. (1993), Reliability of a k-out-of-n : G system with common mode outages, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 41, 5-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(93)90013-O
  10. Meng, F. C. (1996), Comparing the importance of system components by some structural characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 45, 59-65 https://doi.org/10.1109/24.488917
  11. Papastravridis, S. (1987), The most important component in a consecutive-k-out-of-n : G( : F) system, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 36, 266-267 https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1987.5222364
  12. Vesely, W. E. and Davis, T. C. (1985), Two measures of risk importance and their application, Nuclear Safety, 68, 226-234
  13. Vesely, W. E., Belhadj, M. and Rezos, J. T. (1994), PRA importance measures for maintenance prioritization applications, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 43, 307-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(94)90035-3