Gluteal Perforator Flaps for Coverage of Sacral Pressure Sores

둔부 천공지피판을 이용한 천골부 욕창의 재건

  • Heo, Chan Yeong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Jae Hoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang Woo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jung Yoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Soon Sung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Baek, Rong Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Minn, Kyeong Won (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yong Kyu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • 허찬영 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 정재훈 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이상우 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김정윤 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 권순성 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 백롱민 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 민경원 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김용규 (인제대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2006.10.30
  • Published : 2007.03.10

Abstract

Purpose: Gluteal perforator is easily identified in the gluteal region and gluteal perforator flap is a very versatile flap in sacral sore reconstruction. We obtained satisfying results using the gluteal perforator flap, so we report this clinical experiences with a review of the literature. Methods: Between November of 2003 and April 2006, the authors used 16 gluteal perforator flaps in 16 consecutive patients for coverage of sacral pressure sores. The mean age of the patients was 47.4 years (range, 14 to 78 years), and there were 9 male and 7 female patients. All flaps in the series were supplied by musculocutaneous arteries and its venae comitantes penetrating the gluteus maximus muscle and reaching the intrafascial and suprafascial planes, and the overlying skin forming a rich vascular plexus arising from gluteal muscles. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 11.5 months. Results: All flaps survived except one that had undergone total necrosis by patient's negligence. Wound dehiscence was observed in three patients and treated by secondary closure. There was no recurrence during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Gluteal perforator flaps allow safe and reliable options for coverage of sacral pressure sores with minimal donor site morbidity, and do not sacrifice the gluteus maximus muscle and rarely lead to post-operative complications. Freedom in flap design and easy-to perform make gluteal perforator flap an excellent choice for selected patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Kroll SS, Rosenfield L: Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 81: 561, 1988
  2. Shea JD: Pressure sores: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112: 89, 1975
  3. Verpaele AM, Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard PL, Decordier B, Monstrey SJ, Matton G: The superior gluteal artery perforator flap: an additional tool in the treatment of sacral pressure sores. Br J Plast Surg 52: 385, 1999
  4. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A: The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 91: 678, 1993
  5. Ao M, Mae O, Namba Y, Asagoe K: Perforator-based flap for coverage of lumbosacral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 987, 1998
  6. Coskunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE: Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations. Plast Reconstr Surg 113: 2012, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122215.48226.3F
  7. Leow M, Lim J, Lim TC: The superior gluteal artery perforator flap for the closure of sacral sores. Singapore Med J 45: 37, 2004
  8. Meltem C, Esra C, Hasan F, Ali D: The gluteal perforator-based flap in repair of pressure sores. Br J Plast Surg 57: 342, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2003.12.039
  9. Ha SU, Lee KC, Park JM, Kim SK, Lee JH: The parasacral perforator-based island flap for pressure sore. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 31: 473, 2004
  10. Kim JT, Kim JJ, Kim HS, Kim SK: The perforator-based myacutaneous island flap in the reconstruction of sore and perineal wound. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 25:1517, 1998
  11. Kim HS, Kim JJ, Kim JT, Kim SK: The Parasacral perforator-based island skin flaps for sacral pressure sores. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 25: 1508, 1998
  12. Kankaya Y, Ulusoy MG, Oruc M, Yildiz K, Kacer U, Tuccar E: Perforating arteries of the gluteal region:anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 56: 409, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000200775.56263.2d
  13. Giunta RE, Geisweid A Feller AM: The value of preoperative doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 2381, 2000
  14. Blondeel PN, Beyens G, Verhaeghe R, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Monstrey SJ, Matton G: Doppler flowmetry in the planning of perforator flaps. Br J Plast Surg 51: 202, 1998
  15. lchioka S, Okabe K, Tsuji S, Ohura N, Nakatsuka T: Distal perforator-based fasciocutaneous V-Y flap for treatment of sacral pressure ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:906, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000133167.81269.40