Reasonable Decision Making for Sustainable Water Supply Source Management

상수원의 지속가능한 관리를 위한 합리적 의사결정 방향

  • 최지용 (한국환경정책.평가연구원)
  • Received : 2007.05.14
  • Accepted : 2007.06.11
  • Published : 2007.07.30

Abstract

Built-out issue of copper processing appearing recently in the Paldang watershed is a critical problem to deteriorate the basic framework of national water management policy as well as to be simply a copper-related problem. Up to now, Korea government has invested hard and relevant upstream areas have been victimized readily in a variety of field to comply its goal of 'Safe Water Supply'. Because of the reason, the desirable water quality level of the Paldang watershed has been maintained regardless of its dense population. Paldang drinking water management policy is based on residents' understanding which is considered as a 'social capital'. The issue raised in the aspect of water quality management policy should be reviewed on the basis of the 'social capital' concept. One regarding semiconductor industry as a potential industry to export many products in 10 years insists that the industry not be a simple private business but be a prominent part for national competitiveness. There is no doubt about this opinion. However, a nation should support environmental right-to-life of its people prior to any other tasks. In other words, it is really risky to give up people's right due to economic benefits. Therefore, it should not happen to trade 'life', the dignity of man, with national competitiveness which is likely to be preferred in these days. In addition, coherent policy not to destroy 'social capital' promoting Paldang drinking water resource management policy should be maintained.

Keywords

References

  1. 경기도, 제1회 팔당정책포럼 (2007)
  2. 국회 정책토론회(국회의원 정진섭), 상수원보호와 지역개발을 위한 심포지엄 (2007)
  3. 조승헌, 무방류시스템 도입에 따른 의견(미발간), 한국환경 정책평가연구원 (2003)
  4. 최지용, 무방류시스템 도입에 따른 환경규제효율화 방안, 환경정책연구, 2(2), pp. 31-49 (2003)
  5. Roseland, M., Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives, Progress in Planning, 54, pp. 73-132 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9