Genotoxicity Study of Dimethyl Isophthalate in Bacterial and Mammalian Cell System

  • 발행 : 2007.03.31

초록

This study was conducted to evaluate the mutagenic potential of dimethyl isophthalate (DMIP) using Ames bacterial reverse mutation test, chromosomal aberration test and mouse lymphoma $tk^{+/-}$ gene assay. As results, in Ames bacterial reversion assay, DMIP was tested up to the concentration of 5,000 ${\mu}g$/plate and did not induce mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537, and Escherichia coli WP2uvrA with or without metabolic activation (S9 mix). Using cytotoxicity test, the maximal doses of DMIP for chromosomal aberration assay were determined at 1,250 ${\mu}g/mL$, which was a minimum precipitation concentration ($IC_{50}>1,940\;{\mu}g/mL$ or 10 mM) and at 155 ${\mu}g/mL$ ($IC_{50}:155\;{\mu}g/mL$) in the presence and the absence, respectively, of S9 mix. DMIP in the presence of S9 mix induced statistically significant (P<0.001) increases in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations at the dose levels of over 250 ${\mu}g/mL$, when compared with the negative control. However, DMIP in the absence of S9 mix did not caused significant induction in chromosomal aberrant cells. In MLA, DMIP at the dose range of 242.5-1,940 ${\mu}g/mL$ in the presence of S9 mix induced statistically significant increases in mutation frequencies related to small colony growth, whereas any significant mutation frequency was not observed in absence of S9 mix. From these results, it is conclusively suggested that dimethyl isophthalate may be a clastogen rather than a point mutagen.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Li, J. & Gu, J. D. Complete degradation of dimethyl isophathalate requires the biochemical cooperation between Klebsiella oxytoca Sc and Methylobacterium mesophilicum Sr Isolated from Wetland sediment. Sci. Total. Environ. (2007)
  2. The ministry of Environment, Survey on circulation volume and use pattern. (2002)
  3. Krasavage, W. J., Yanno, F. J. & Terhaar, C. J. Dimethyl terephthalate (DMT). Acute toxicity subacute. Feeding inhalation studies in male rats. Am. Indust. Hyg. Assoc. J. 34:455-462 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1080/0002889738506879
  4. Toxicology/Regulatory Services Inc. 12. USEPA HPV Challenge Program. Assessment of Data availability and Test plan for Dimethyl Isophthalate. (2006)
  5. Li, J., Gu, J. D. & Pan, L. Transformation of dimethyl phthalate, dimethyl isophthalate and dimethl tereph-thalate by Rhodococcus rubber Sa and modeling the processes using the modified Gompertz model. International Bidodeterioration & Biodegradation 55:223 -232 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.12.003
  6. Applegate, M. L. et al. Molecular dissection of mutations at the heterozygous thymidine kinase locus in mouse lymphoma cells. Proc. Natl. Sci. USA. 87:51- 55 (1990)
  7. Moore, M. M. et al. In situ analysis of trifluorothymidine- resistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Res. 151(1):147- 159 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(85)90193-9
  8. Moore, M. M. et al. Analysis of trifluorothymidineresistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Res. 151(1):161-174 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(85)90194-0
  9. Eaton, R. W. & Ribbons, D. W. Metabolism of dimethylphthalate by Micrococcus sp. Strain 12B. J. Bacteriol. 151:464-467 (1982)
  10. Sivamurthy, K., Swamy, B. M. & Pujar, B. G. Transformation of dimethylterephthalate by the fungus Sclerotium rolfsii. FEMS Microbiolo. Lett. 79:37-40 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1991.tb04500.x
  11. Larsen, S. T. et al. Adjuvant and immuno-suppressive effect of six monophthalates in a subcutaneous injection model with BALB/c mice. Toxicol. 169:37-51 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00484-X
  12. Jepsen, K. F., Abildtrup, A. & Larsen, S. T. Monophthalates promote IL-6 and IL-8 production in the human epithelial cell line A549. Toxicol. In Vitro 18: 265-269 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2003.09.008
  13. Ames, B. N., McCann, J. & Yamasaki, E. Method for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with Salmonella/ mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 31:347-364 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(75)90046-1
  14. Maron, D. M. & Ames, B. N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 113: 173 -215 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9
  15. Green, M. H. L. & Muriel, W. J. Mutagen testing using Trp- reversion in Escherichia coli. Mutation Res. 38:3-32 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(76)90076-5
  16. OECD: OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals, Section 4: Chapter 471, Bacterial reverse mutation test, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France (1997)
  17. OECD: OECD guideline for testing of chemicals, Section 4: Chapter 473, In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France (1997)
  18. Ishidate, M. & Odashima, S. Chromosome test with 134 compounds on chinese hamster cells in vitro-A screening for chemical carcinogens. Mutation Res. 48:337-354 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(77)90177-4
  19. Ryu, J. C. et al. Genotoxicity Study of Bojungchisuptang, an oriental herbal decoction-in vitro chromosome aberration assay in chinese hamster lung cells and in vitro supravital-staining micronucleus assay with mouse peripheral reticulocytes. Arch. Pharm. Res. 21(4):391-397 (1998b) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02974632
  20. Ryu, J. C., Kim, K. R., Lee, S. & Park, J. Evaluation of the genetic toxicity of synthetic chemicals (III), Chromosomal aberration assay with 28 chemicals in chinese hamster lung cells in vitro. Environ. Mutagens & Carcinogens 21(1):14-22 (2001)
  21. JEMS-MMS. Atlas of chromosome aberration by chemicals. Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society- Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group, Tokyo, Japan (1988)
  22. Altman, D. G. Practical statistics for medical research, in Chapter 10. Comparing groups-categorical data, London, Chapman & Hall. 229-276 (1993)
  23. Kim, Y. J. & Rye, J. C. Evaluation of the genetic toxicity of synthetic chemicals (XVI)-in vitro mouse lymphoma assay with 3chemicals. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2(4):244-250 (2006)
  24. Clements, J. Gene mutation assays in mammalian cells, In O'Hare, S. & Atterwill, C.K. (Ed.), Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 43: in vitro Toxicity Testing Protocols. Humana Press Inc. Totowa, NJ. 277-286 (1990)
  25. Robinson, W. D. et al. Statistical evaluation of bacterial/ mammalian fluctuation tests, in Statistical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Test Data (Kirkland, D. J., ed.). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. UK. 102- 140 (1990)