DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Architectural Reference Model for Semantic Library

시맨틱 라이브러리를 위한 아키텍처 참조 모델

  • Published : 2007.03.30

Abstract

The current technological revolution pushes forward the innovation in the library information systems. This study proposes functional requirements and an architectural reference model of Semantic Library, recognized as a prototype of next-generation library information systems, that is a seamless convergence of the library information systems and the Internet technologies. Semantic Library can realize semantic interoperability and integration based on ontology and metadata, and also renovate information services for users with openness, sharing, participation and collaboration. Semantic Library will be effectively implemented by means of service-oriented architecture and the logical structure of FRBR. In this study, a reference model of Semantic Library consisting of 6 horizontal layers and 3 vertical elements is presented as a next-generation model of library information systems.

기술 환경의 변화는 문헌정보시스템의 혁신적인 변화를 촉진하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 문헌 정보 체계기술과 인터넷 정보기술을 융합된 차세대 문헌 정보 시스템의 원형으로 시맨틱 라이브러리를 정의하고, 시맨틱 라이브러리의 기능적 요구사항과 아키텍처의 참조모델을 제시하였다. 시맨틱 라이브러리는 온톨로지와 메타데이터 기반의 의미적 상호 운용성과 통합을 실현하고 정보 자원의 개방과 공유 참여와 협업을 통하여 이용자 정보서비스를 혁신하는 체제이다. 또한 시맨틱 라이브러리는 FRBR의 논리구조를 근간으로 하여 서비스 지향 아키텍처로 구현됨으로써 효과적으로 시스템을 구축을 실현할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 차세대 문헌정보 시스템의 모델로 6개 수평 계층과 3개 수직요소로 구성되는 시맨틱 라이브러리의 참조 모델을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 민미경. 2002. 국내외 디지털도서관 및 관련표준 현황. 정보과학회지, 20(8): 5-16.
  2. 이수상. 2003. 전자도서관의 최근 동향. "한국정보과학회 데이터베이스 연구", 18(3): 3-17.
  3. 이현실, 한성국. 2005. Topic Maps를 이용한 MARC 데이터의 FRBR모텔 구현에 관한 연구, 정보관리학회지, 22(3) : 289-306. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.289
  4. Aalberg, Trond. 2006. A Tool for Converting Bibliographic Records. ERCIM News. 66. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  5. Arms, William Y. 2002. DLESE in Context: Educational Computing, Digital Libraries and Scientific Education. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  6. Bonariabiancu. 2006. Library 2.0 meme map. Version 2. 0.
  7. Chad, Ken, Paul Miller. 2005. Do libraries Matter? The rise of Library 2. 0. A white paper. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  8. Ferran, Nuria, Enric Mor, and Julia Minguillon. 2005. "Towards Personalization in Digital Libraries Through Ontologies." Library Management, 26(4/5): 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120510596062
  9. Rathje, Bente Dahl, Margaret McGrory, Carol Pollitt, Paivi Voutilainen. 2005. Designing and Building Integrated Digital Library Systems - Guidelines. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions IFLA Professional Reports, No. 90 https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120510596062
  10. DELOS. 2005. "Future Digital Library Management Systems: System Architecture and Information Access." 8th DELOS Thematic Workshop. Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany March 29 - April 1, 2005
  11. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Final Report. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Final Report. K. G. Saur Munchen : IFLA Section on Cataloguing
  12. Gilliland-Swetland, Anne J. 2000. Introduction to Metadata: Pathways to Digital Information - Setting the Stage. [cited 2007. 1. 3],
  13. Goncalves, Marcos Andre, Layne T. Watson, and Edward A. Fox 2004. "Towards a Digital Library Theory: A Formal Digital Library Ontology." In Mathematical Formal Methods workshop, SIGIR 2004, Sheffield, England
  14. International Technology Research Institute, World Technology (WTEC) Division. 1999. WTEC Panel Report on Digital Information Organization in Japan. Baltimore, Maryland: Loyola College
  15. Kruk, Sebastian Ryszard, Stefan Decker, and Lech Zieborak. 2005. JeromeDL - Reconnecting Digital Libraries and the Semantic Web. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  16. Lytras, Miltiadis, Miguel-Angel Sicilia, John Davies, and Vipul Kashyap. 2005. "Digital Libraries in the Knowledge Era: Knowledge Management and Semantic Web Technologies." Journal of Library Management, 26(4/5): 170-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120510596026
  17. Maness, Jack M. 2006. "Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries." Webology, 3(2). [cited 2007. 1. 3]. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120510596026
  18. Matadata and the UT Austin Digital Assets Management System. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  19. Miller, Paul. 2005. Web 2.0: Building the New Library. ARIADNE, 45. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  20. Miller, Paul. 2006a. Library 2.0: The Challenge of Disruptive Innovation. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  21. Miller, Paul, 2006b. "Coming Together around Library 2.0." D-Lib Magazine, 12(4). [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  22. Morgan, Eric Lease. 2002. Web Services at OCLC. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  23. O'Reilly, Tim. 2005. What Is Web 2.0 :Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software [cited 2007. 1. 3],
  24. Soergel, Dagobert. 2002. A Framework for Digital Library Research, D-Lib Magazine, 8(12). [cited 2007. 1. 3].:
  25. Sugimoto, Shigeo. 2005 Models and Requirements of Metadata: Metadata Project at Tsukuba and Lesson Learned. [cited 2007. 1. 5].
  26. Sure, York, and Rudi Studer. 2005. Semantic Web Technologies for Digital Libraries. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  27. Synak, Marcin, and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk. 2005. MarcOnt Initiative - the Ontology for the Librarian World. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005. Heraklion, Greece, 29. May-1.June 2005. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  28. W3C. 2001. Semantic Web. [cited 2007. 1. 3].
  29. Warren, Paul, and David Alsmeyer. 2005. "Applying Semantic Technology to a Digital Library: a Case Study." Library Management, 26(4/5): 196-205 https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120510596053
  30. Wong, Mary. 2006. Ontology Development in the Context of Science Digital Libraries. [cited 2006. 10. 14].
  31. Zubair, M. K. Maly, I. Ameerally and M. Nelson. Dynamic Construction of Federated Digital Libraries. [cited 2007. 1. 3].

Cited by

  1. A Design and Implementation of Application Profile Core Ontology vol.24, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.3.245
  2. A Study on Constructing the Ontology of LIS Journal vol.28, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.177
  3. A Logical Model of Library System towards Knowledge Service vol.26, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.045