Size and Retention of Tongue Bulb for Tongue Retaining Device

혀 유지구의 크기와 유지력 평가

  • Park, Nam-Seon (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Ho (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Mee-Eun (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Suk (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 박남선 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 이기호 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김미은 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김기석 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실)
  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

In several treatment modalities for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), oral appliances mainly including mandibular advancement appliance (MAA) and tongue retaining device (TRD) are recognized as a non-invasive, reversible alternative with favorable results. Tongue bulb is a major component of TRD which prevents the tongue from approaching the posterior wall of the pharynx and can be combined with MAA. Determination of tongue bulb size for the patient is important for therapeutic effect, but frequently needs time-consuming work. For effective fabrication and standardization of tongue bulbs, this study aimed to categorize tongue bulb size for healthy young men and to examine its relation with maximum retention force and with physical parameters including tongue-related variables. 36 non-snoring, asymptomatic young men with normal occlusion were voluntarily participated in this study (mean age: $24.47{\pm}2.58$ years). Experimental procedures consisted of prefabrication of tongue bulb set (20 types with a width of 27-36mm and thickness of 8 and 10 mm), determination of tongue bulb size and the maximum retention force for each subject, and measurement of physical parameters including body mass index (BMI), neck circumference and width, thickness and length of tongue. This study showed that there was significant difference of retention force among the bulb size-related groups both in upright and supine position (p<0.05) and that retention force increased with bulb size. Correlation of tongue bulb size with physical parameters was not clearly verified and there was no significant difference in retention force between upright and supine positions. Based on our results, it can be suggested that retention force relates with tongue bulb size, ultimately with tongue volume. A further study needs to be performed in the patients with snoring and OSA.

구강장치를 이용한 코골이와 수면무호흡증의 치료는 하악이나 혀를 전방으로 이동시켜 기도공간을 확보하는데, 하악전방이동장치(mandibular advancement appliance, MAA)와 혀견인장치(tongue retaining device, TRD)가 주로 이용된다. 이 중 혀견인장치는 전치의 순측에 위치되는 혀 유지구(tongue bulb) 속에 생기는 음압을 이용하여 혀가 뒤로 밀리지 않도록 하는 구강장치로서 단독 혹은 하악전방이동장치와 복합된 형태로 사용하여 코골이와 수면무호흡증의 치료에 효과를 보이는 것으로 보고되고 있다. 본 연구는 혀견인장치의 제작을 용이하게 하고 표준화하기 위해 개개인에 적합한 혀 유지구의 크기를 조사하여 분류하고 혀 유지구의 크기와 유지력의 관계 및 신체적 변수와의 관계를 조사해 보고자 하였다. 환자를 대상으로 하기에 앞서, 정상인 젊은 남성을 대상으로 시행하였다. 실험을 위해 투명 아크릴 레진 판을 이용하여 폭(27-36 mm)과 두께(8, 10 mm)를 달리한 20 가지 크기의 혀유지구를 제작하고 준비하였다. 코골이와 수면무호흡증이 없는 36명의 젊은 남성 지원자들(평균연령: $24.47{\pm}2.58$세)을 대상으로 다양한 크기의 혀 유지구를 장착하여 유지력을 측정하여 최대유지력을 보이는 혀 유지구를 그 환자에게 적합한 크기의 유지구로 결정하고 측정한 값들을 기록하였다. 측정은 앉은 자세와 누운 자세에서 각각 시행하였다. 실험 결과, 앉은 자세와 누운 자세 모두에서 혀 유지구 크기에 따라 분류한 네 군의 유지력 사이에는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다 (p<0.05). 즉, 피검자에게 가장 적합한 크기의 유지구로 조사한 결과 유지구의 크기가 증가할수록 유지력이 증가하는 양상을 보였다. 신체적 변수와 혀 유지구 크기 사이의 관련성은 뚜렷하게 관찰되지 않았으며, 측정 자세에 따른 유지력 간에도 유의한 차이는 없었다. 본 연구의 결과는 혀 유지구의 유지력은 유지구의 크기, 즉 혀의 부피와 관련이 있음을 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. Raphaelson M, Hakim TS. Diagnosis sleep apnea in dental patients. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:797-816
  2. Ayappa I,Rapoport DM. The upper airway in sleep: physiology of the pharynx. Sleep Medicine Reviews 2003;7:9-33 https://doi.org/10.1053/smrv.2002.0238
  3. Yong T, Palta M, Dempsey J et al. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1230-1235 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199304293281704
  4. Ivanhoe JR, Attanasio R. Sleep disorders and oral devices. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:735-758
  5. Boudewyns AN, Van de Heyning PH. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children: An overview. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1995;49:275-279
  6. Ryan CF, Lowe AA, Li D et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea before and after chronic nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:939-944 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/144.4.939
  7. Lindberg E, Gislason T. Epidemiology of sleep-related obstructive breathing. Sleep Medicine Reviews 2000;4: 411-433 https://doi.org/10.1053/smrv.2000.0118
  8. HoffsteinV. Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Breath 2007;11:1-22 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-006-0084-8
  9. Chaudhary BA, Bliwise DL. Therapy for sleep apnea: Who should be treated with CPAP? J Med Assoc Ga1977;86:230-232
  10. Delguste P, Rodenstein DO. Compliance, education, monitoring in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea by nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Sleep 2000; 23:S158-S160
  11. Piper AJ, Stewart DA. An overview of nasal CPAP therapy in the management of obstructive sleep apnea. Ear Nose Throat J 1999;78:776-790
  12. Li KK, Reley RW, Powell NB et al. Obstructive sleep apnea surgery: Patient perspective and polysomnographic results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:572-575 https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.110107
  13. Li KK, Reley RW, Powell NB et al. Maxillomandibular advancement for persistent obstructive sleep apnea after phase I surgery in patients without maxillomandibular deficiency. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1684-1688 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200010000-00021
  14. Shepard J, Olsen K. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Mayo Clin Pro 1990;65:1260-1267 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(12)62750-5
  15. American Sleep Disorders Association Task Force. Practice parameters for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with oral appliances. Sleep 1995;18:511-513 https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/18.6.511
  16. Clark GT, Arand D, Chung E, Tong D. Effect of anterior mandibular positioning on obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:624-629 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/147.3.624
  17. Cartwright RD, Samelson CF. The effects of a nonsurgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. JAMA 1982;248:705-709 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.248.6.705
  18. Bonham P, Currier G, Orr WC, Othman J, Nanda RS. The effect of a modified functional appliance on obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:384-392 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90127-8
  19. Geroge P. A modified functional appliance for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:171-175
  20. Schmidt-Nowara WW, Meade TE, Hays MB. Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with a dental orthosis. Chest 1991;99:1378-1385 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.99.6.1378
  21. Ferguson KA, Love LL, Ryan CF. Effect of mandibular and tongue protrusion on upper airway size during wakefulness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155:1748-1754 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154887
  22. Cho CB, Kim ME, Kim KS. Changes of the pharyngeal space by various oral appliances for snoring. In preparation
  23. Baily DR. Oral evaluation and upper airway anatomy associated with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:715-732
  24. Davis RJ, Stradling JE. The relationship between neck circumference, radiographic pharyngeal anatomy, and the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J 1990;3:509-514
  25. National Institutes of Health: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Sleep Apnea. Sleep apnea: Is your patient at risk? Am Family Physician 1996;53:247-253
  26. Kryger MH. Roth T, Dement WC(eds). Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine. 3rd ed., Philadelphia, 2000, WB Saunders
  27. Do KL, Ferreyra H, Healy JF, Davidson TM. Does tongue size differ between patients with and without sleep-disordered breathing? Laryngoscope 2000;110: 1552-1555 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200009000-00027
  28. DeBerry-Borowiecki B, Kukwa A, Blanks RH. Cephalometric analysis for diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope 1988;98: 226-234
  29. Lyberg T, Krogstad O, Djupesland G. Cephalometric analysis in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: soft tissue morphology. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:293-297 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100108746
  30. Strezlow VV, Blanks RH, Basile A, Strezlow AE. Cephalometric airway analysis in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Laryngoscope 1988;98:1149-1158
  31. Cartwright RD. Effect of sleep position on sleep apnea severity. Sleep 1984;7:110-114 https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/7.2.110
  32. Suratt PM, Pee P, Atkinson RL et al. Fluoroscopic and computed tomographic features of the pharyngeal airway in obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127:487-492 https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1983.127.4.487
  33. Gastaut H, Tassinari CA, Duron B. Polygraphic study of the episodic diurnal and nocturnal (hypnic and respiratory) manifestations of the Pickwick syndrome. Brain Res 1966;1:167-186 https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(66)90117-X
  34. Schmidt-Nowara W. A review of sleep disorders: The history and diagnosis of sleep disorders related to the dentist. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:631-642
  35. Ivanhoe JR, Cibirka RM, Lefebvre CA et al. Dental considerations in upper airway sleep disorders: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82: 685-698 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70010-7
  36. Pae EK. A comparative study of the relationship between airway size, tongue activity, and body position. Master's Thesis, Univ of British Columbia Vancouver. 1989
  37. Yilidrim N, Fitzpatrick MF, Whyte KF, Jalleh R, Wightman AJA, Douglas NJ. The effect of posture on upper airway dimension in normal subjects and in patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:845-847 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/144.4.845
  38. Pracharktam N, Hans MG, Strohl KP, Redline S. Upright and supine cephalometric evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and snoring subjects. Angle Orthod 1994;64:63-74