Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Supplementary Immune Modulators(MOS, Lectin) and Organic Acid Mixture(Organic acid F, Organic acid G) on the Performance, Profile of Leukocytes and Erythrocytes, Small Intestinal Microflora and Immune Response in Laying Hens

면역기능 조절제(MOS, Lectin)와 유기산제(Organic acid F, Organic acid G)가 산란계의 생산성, 혈액성상과 소장내 미생물 균총 및 면역체계에 미치는 영향

  • Woo, K.C. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Industrial Science, Chung Ang University) ;
  • Kim, C.H. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Industrial Science, Chung Ang University) ;
  • Paik, I.K. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Industrial Science, Chung Ang University)
  • 우경천 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 김찬호 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 백인기 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과)
  • Published : 2007.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of MOS, lectin and organic acid mixture(Organic acid F, Organic acid G) on the egg production, egg quality, profile of leukocytes and erythrocytes, small intestinal microflora and immune response in laying hens. A total of 900 Hy-line BrownⓇ laying hens of 48 wks old were assigned to one of the following 6 dietary treatments:control(C), C+AvillamycinⓇ 6ppm, C+MOS 250ppm, C+lectin 12.5ppm, C+Organic acid F(formic acid 35.4%, formate 34.6%, potassium 30.0%) 0.3% and C+0rgarnic acid G(fumaric acid 23%, calcium formate 14%, potassium sorbate 5%, calcium propionate 7%) 0.06%. Each treatment was replicated five times with thirty birds per replicate, housed in 2 bird cages. Feeding trial lasted for 6 wks under 16 hours lighting regimen. All supplemental groups were higher than the control in 6 wks hen-day and hen-housed egg production showing the highest with MOS treatment(P<0.05). Soft & broken egg productions were lower in supplemental groups than in the control except lectin treatment(P<0.05). Eggyolk color of supplemental groups was higher than that of the control except Organic acid G treatment(P<0.05). The values of RBC, HB, MCHC were highest in lectin treatment and lowest in MOS treatment(P<0.05). The numbers of intestinal microflora were not significantly different among the treatments. Serum IgG levels of all supplemental groups were higher than those of the control(P<0.05). In conclusion, for supplementation of antibiotics, immune modulators and organic acid mixture improved production parameters in general. Among the supplements, MOS showed the best performance in egg production and eggyolk color.

본 시험은 대조구, 항생제 처리구:Avilla- mycin?? 6ppm, MOS 처리구:MOS 250ppm, lectin 처리구:Mannosespepecific lectin 12.5ppm, Organic acid F 처리구:FORMI??(formic acid 35.4%, formate 34.6%, potassium 30.0%) 0.3%, Organic acid G처리구: GALLACID?? 0.06% 등 6처리구를 두고 이들 처리가 산란계에 미치는 영향을 비교 평가하기 위하여 생산성, 혈액성상, 혈청 IgG, 장내 미생물 균총을 조사하였다. 사양시험은 48주령의 산란계(Hy-Line Brown??) 900수를 선별하여 6처리, 5반복, 반복당 15케이지, 케이지당 2수씩 A형 2단 케이지에 수용하고 randomized block design으로 배치하였다. 6주 동안의 산란율(hen-day, hen- house egg production)에서는 MOS 처리구가 가장 높은 산란율을 보였고 모든 첨가구가 대조구보다 산란율이 높았다(P<0.05). 난중은 lectin 처리구가 가장 높았으며 모든 첨가구들이 대조구보다 높은 경향이 있었다. 연파란율은 lectin 처리구를 제외한 모든 첨가구들이 대조구보다 낮았다(P<0.05). 난황색은 Organic acid G 처리구를 제외한 모든 첨가구들이 대조구보다 높았다(P<0.05). Haugh unit는 lectin 처리구가 가장 높았으며 모든 첨가구들이 대조구보다 높았다. Leukocytes 중 SI는 lectin 처리구가 가장 높았다(P<0.05). Erythrocytes 중 RBC, HB, MCHC는 lectin 처리구가 가장 높았으며 MOS 처리구가 가장 낮았다(P<0.05). 장내 미생물에서는 처리구간에 유의적인 차이는 없었으나 Lactobacilli 수는 대조구보다 첨가구들이 높은 경향이 있었고 Cl. perfringens 수는 Organic acid F를 제외한 모든 첨가구들이 대조구보다 낮은 경향이 있었다. 혈청 IgG 농도는 MOS 처리구가 가장 높았으며 모든 첨가구들이 대조구보다 유의적으로 높았다(P<0.05). 결론적으로 본 시험에서 사용된 면역조절제(MOS, Lectin)와 유기산제는 산란계에서 항생제(Avilamycin??)와 유사한 생산성을 나타내어 항생제 대체제로서 산란계의 생산성을 효과적으로 개선 할 수 있으며 특히 이중에서 MOS의 생산성 개선효과가 가장 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. AL-Tarazi, Y. H. and Alshawabkeh, K. 2003. Effect of dietary formic acid and propionic acid on salmonella pullorum shedding and mortility in layer chicks after experimental infection. Vet. Public Health 50(3): 112-117
  2. Arnold, J. N., Dwek, R. A., Rudd, P. M. A. and Sim, R. B. 2006. Mannan binding lectin and its interaction with immunoglobulin in health and in disease. Immunol. Lett. 106(2)103-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2006.05.007
  3. Bozkurt, M. and Baser, K. H. C. 2002. The effect of antibiotics, mannan oligosaccharides and essential oil mixture on laying hen performance. 1st European Symposium, Bioactive Secondary Plant Products in Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  4. Cetin, N., Guclu, B. K. and Cetin, E. 2005. The Effect of Probiotics and Mannan-oligosaccharide on some Haernatological and Immunological Parameters in Turkey. J. Vet. Med. A 52:263-267 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2005.00736.x
  5. Chaveerach, P., Keuzenkamp, D. A., Lipman, L. J. and Van Knapen, F. 2002. In vitro study on the effect of organic acid on Campylobacter jejunilcoli population in mixtures of water and feed. Poultry Sci. 81(5):621-628. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.5.621
  6. Chaveerach, P., Keuzenkarnp, D. A., Lipman, L. J. and Van Knapen, F. 2004. Effect of organic acid in drinking water for young broilers on Campylobacter infection, volatile fatty acid production, gut microflora and histological cell changes. Poultry Sci. 83(3):330-334 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.3.330
  7. Cotter, P. T. 2000. Analysis of chicken bile by gel precipitation reaction using a lectin in the place of antibody. Poultry Sci. 79(9):1276-1281 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.9.1276
  8. Dalloul, R. A., Lillehoj, H. S., Lee, J. S., Lee, J. S. and Chung, K. S. 2006. Immunopotentiating effect of a Fomitella fraxinea-derived lectin on chicken immunity and resistance to coccidiosis. Poultry Sci. 85:446-451 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.3.446
  9. Dimovelis, E., Christake, A., Goussi, T. and Spais, A. B. 2003. Effect of Bio-MOS${\circledR}$ on growth, egg production and egg quality of Lohmann brown layer. Poster presented at Alltech' 19th Annual Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Industries, Lexington, Ky
  10. Fernandez, F., Hinton, M. and Van Gils, B. 2002. Dietary mannan-oligosaccharides and their effect on chicken caecal microflora in relation to Salmonella enteritidis colonization. Avian Pathol. 31(1):49-58 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450120106000
  11. Glick, D. M., Valier, M. J., Rowlands, C. C., Evans, J. C and Kay, J. 1982. Activation of spin labeled chicken pepsinogen. Biochemistry. 1982 Aug 3:21(16):3746-3750 https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00259a004
  12. Izat, A. L., Adams, M. H., Cabel, M. C, Colberg, M., Reiber, M. A., Skinner, J. T. and Waldroup, P. W. 1990. Effect of formic acid or calcium formate in feed on performance and microbiological characteristics of broiler. Poultry Sci. 69(11):1876-82 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691876
  13. Jull-Madsen, H. R., Munch, M., Handberg, K. J., Sorensen, P., Johnson, A. A. and Jorgensen, P. H. 2003. Serum levels of mannan-binding lectin in chickens prior to and during experimental infection with avian infectious bronchitis virus. Poultry Sci. 82:235-241 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.2.235
  14. Margarita, N. G., Magne, S., Hanne, O. and Henning, S. 2004. Acidified litter benefits the intestinal flora balance of broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbial 70(9):5208-5213 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5208-5213.2004
  15. Melvin, J. S. 1984. Physiological Properties & Cellular & Chemical Constituents of Blood. Dukes' Physiology of Domestic Animals. 10th Ed
  16. Parttanen, K. H. and Mroz, Z. 1991. Organic acid for performance enhancement in pig diet. Nutr. Res. Rev. 117-145
  17. SAS Institute. 1996. SAS/STAT$^{\circledR}$ User's Guide. Release 6.12 Ed. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC USA
  18. Savage, T. F., Cotter, P. F. and Zakrzewska, E. I. 1996. The effect of feeding a mannanoligosaccharide on immunoglobulin plasma IgA and bile IgA of male turkey. Poultry Sci.(Suppl.l):143
  19. Shashidhara, R. G. and Devegowda, G. 2003. Effect of dietary mannan-oligosaccharide on broiler breeder production traits and immunity. Poultry Sci. 82:1319-1325 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.8.1319
  20. Spring, P., Wenk, C, Dawson, K. A. and Newman, K. E. 2000. The effects of dietary mannan-oligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poultry Sci. 79(2):205-211 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.2.205
  21. Stanley, V. G., Brown, C. and Selfton, T. 2000. Single and combined effects of dietary protease and mannan-oligosaccharide on the performance of laying hen. Poultry Sci. 79(Suppl.l): 62(Abstract)
  22. Thompson, J. L. and Hinton, M. 1997. Antibacterial activity of formic acid and propionic acid in the diet of hen on Salmonellas in the crop. Br. Poultry Sci. 38(1):59-65 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669708417941
  23. Zaghini, A., Martelli, G., Roncada, P., Simioli, M. and Rizzi, L. 2005. Mannan-oligosaccharides and Aflatoxin B1 in feed for laying hens : Effects on egg quality, Aflatoxin Bl and Ml residues in egg, and Aflatoxin Bl levels in liver. Poultry Sci. 84:825-832 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.6.825
  24. Zdunczyk, Z., Juskiewicz, J., Jankowski, J. and Koncicki, A. 2005. Metabolic response of the gastrointestinal tract of turkey to diets with different levels of mannan-oligosaccharide. Poultry Sci. 84(6):903-909 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.6.903
  25. 김관응, 유선종, 안병기, 조태수, 안병준, 최돈하, 강창원. 2006. 목초액 함유 활성탄 급여가 산란 계에서 계란의 품질과 화학적 조성에 미치는 영 향. 한국동물자원과학회지 48(1):59-68 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2006.48.1.059
  26. 김성권, 유선종, 안병기, 박근규, 이훈택, 송창선, 허억, 강창원. 2004. 사료내 감태 및감태로부터 추출한 crude protein의 첨가가 육계의 생산성 및 면역반응에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 제 21 차 정기총회 및 학술발표회. 23-25
  27. 박재홍, 박강희, 류경선. 2002. 유기산제와 효모 배양물의 급여가 산란계의 생상성 및 품질에 미 치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 29(2):109-115
  28. 심재민. 2003. 감태와 감태부산물의 영양적 가치 평가와 사료 내 첨가가 양계의 내명성 및 생산성 에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  29. 이흥룡, 류경선. 2001 산란계 사료에 목초액의 첨가 급여가 생산성 및 계란품질에 미치는 영향. 한국동물자원과학회지 43(5):655-662

Cited by

  1. Effects of in Ovo Injection and Inclusion a Blend of Essential Oils and Organic Acids in High NSPs Diets of Broiler Breeders on Performance of Them and Their Offspring vol.53, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0150150