Technical Modification and Comparison of Results with Hirabayashi's Open-door Laminoplasty

  • Kim, Young-Sung (Department of Neurosurgery Inha University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Seung-Hwan (Department of Neurosurgery Inha University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Hyung-Chun (Department of Neurosurgery Inha University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Chong-Oon (Department of Neurosurgery Inha University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Hyeon-Seon (Department of Neurosurgery Inha University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyun, Dong-Keun (Department of Neurosurgery Inha University College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2007.09.28

Abstract

Objective : Hirabayashi's open-door laminoplasty is a good procedure to use to treat patients with myelopathy of the cervical spine; however, the authors have experienced problems in maintaining an open-window in cervical spines after the surgery. The authors developed a modified method of the expanded open-door laminoplasty and compared the radiological and clinical results with those of the classical method. Methods : In the modified method, wiring fixation with lateral mass screws on the contra lateral-side instead of fixing the paraspinal muscle or facet joint, as in the classical methods, was used in the open window of the cervical spine. Fifteen patients with cervical myelopathy were treated using the classical method and 12 patients were treated using the modified method. Preoperative and postoperative clinical conditions were assessed according to the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. The radiological results were compared with the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) findings. Results : In both methods, the clinical results revealed a significant improvement in neurological function (p<0.001). Image analysis revealed that the cervical canals were continuously expanded in patients treated using the modified methods. However, authors have observed restenosis during the follow-up periods in 4 patients treated using the original method. Progression to deformity and spinal instability were not observed in any of the patients in the radiological results. Conclusion : Although analysis with a larger population and a longer follow-up period needs to be undertaken, our modified open-door laminoplasty has shown an advantage in better maintaining an open window in comparison with the Hirabayashi's open-door laminoplasty.

Keywords

References

  1. Butler JC, Whitecloud TS 3rd : Postlaminectomy kyphosis : Causes and surgical management. Orthop Clin North Am 23 : 505-511, 1992
  2. Chiles BW 3rd, Leonard MA, Choundhri HF, Cooper PR : Cervical spondylotic myelopathy : patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 44 : 762-769, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199904000-00041
  3. Guigui P, Lefevre C, Lassale B, Deburge A : Static, dynamic changes of the cervical spine after laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84 : 17-25, 1998
  4. Heller JG, Edwards CC 2nd, Murakami H, Rodts GE : Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Spine 26 : 1330-1336, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200106150-00013
  5. Herkowitz HN : Surgical management of cervical disc disease : 'open-door' laminoplasty. Seminar in Spine Surgery 1 : 245-253, 1989
  6. Hirabayashi K : Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Jpn J Surg 32 : 1159-1163, 1978
  7. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K : Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop 359 : 35-48, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199902000-00005
  8. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y : Expansive opendoor laminoplasty for cervical spine stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8 : 693-699, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198310000-00003
  9. Hukuda S, Ogata M, Mochizuki T, Shichikawa K : Laminectomy versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy : Brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70 : 325-326, 1988
  10. Itoh T, Tsuji H : Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine 10 : 729-736, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198510000-00007
  11. Jeon SC, Chough CK, Park HK, Lee KJ, Rha HK, Kim MC : Surgical technique and long-term follow-up of cervical laminoplasty using titanium miniplates. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 36 : 369-374, 2004
  12. Kamo Y, Takemitsu Y, Hamada O : Cervical laminoplasty by splitting the spinous process using AW glass-ceramic lamina spacer. Rinsho Seikeigeka 10 : 1115-1122, 1992
  13. Koyama T, Handa J : Cervical laminoplasty using apatite beads as implants : experiences in 31 patients with compressive myelopathy due to developmental canal stenosis. Surg Neurol 24 : 663-667, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(85)90128-4
  14. Lonstein JE : Post-laminectomy kyphosis. Clin Orthop 128 : 93-100, 1977
  15. Mochida J, Nomura T, Chiba M, Nishimura K, Toh E : Modified expansive open-door laminoplasty in cervical myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 12 : 386-391, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199912050-00006
  16. Nakano K, Harata S, Suetsuna F, Araki T, Itoh J : Spinous processsplitting laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer. Spine 17 : 41-43, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199203001-00009
  17. O'Brien MF, Peterson D, Casey AT, Crockard HA : A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization : a computerized morphometric analysis. Spine 21 : 474-484, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199602150-00012