Fashion & Textile Research Journal (한국의류산업학회지)

The Society of Fashion and Textile Industry (한국의류산업학회)
권호 표지

Influences of Consumers' Fashion Innovativeness and Technological Innovativeness on Attitudes and Buying Intention toward Smart Clothing

소비자의 유행혁신성과 기술혁신성이 스마트 의류에 대한 태도와 구매의도에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2006.07.04
  • Published : 2007.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Smart Clothing is digital wear progressed from wearable computer that the function of clothing is unified with that of a computer to extend human ability in everyday life. To study consumers' perception and responses toward the Smart Clothing, this study tested the influence of fashion innovativeness and technological innovativeness on attitudes and buying intention related to the Smart Clothing. Data were collected through a survey with 256 male and female adults in age from 18 to 45 year old. The results of Pearson correlation analysis revealed that there was not a positive relationship between fashion innovativeness and technological innovativeness. Multiple regression analysis indicated that fashion innovativeness was a significant predictor of attitudes and buying intention regarding the Smart Clothing. In addition, respondents were classified into four groups according to the scores of their fashion innovativenss and technological innovativeness. A series of ANOVA and Duncan test were used to determine if significant differences existed among four groups. The group having high level of innovativeness on both fashion and technology had the most positive attitudes toward smart clothing. The individuals having cognitive experiences of the Smart Clothing had higher level of fashion innovativeness and more positive attitudes to it. Based on these findings, recommendations for the developer of Smart Clothing and future research are offered.

Keywords

References

  1. 강상임 (2005) DMB서비스를 위한 탐색적 연구. 숙명여자대학교 경 영대학원 석사학위논문
  2. 김유경 (2005) Smart clothing 연구방법론에 관한 고찰. 한국디자인문화학회지, 11(3), 29-35
  3. 김한나 . 이은영 (2001) 유행동조성과 혁신성에 따른 소비자 세분화 및 준거대상 연구. 한국의류학회지, 25(7), 1341-1352
  4. 김해룡 . 홍신명 . 이문규 (2005) 컨버전스 제품에 대한 소비자 평가. 한국마케팅저널, 7(1), 1-20
  5. 박선형 (2000) 웨어러블 컴퓨터(Wiearable computer)개념을 기반으로 한 의류 상품 디자인의 가능성 탐색. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  6. 박선형 .이주현 (2001) 웨어러블 컴퓨터 개념을 기반으로 한 의류상품 디자인의 가능성 탐색 1. 한국비지니스학회지, 5(3), 111-128
  7. 박재진 (2004) 소비자 혁신성이 온라인쇼핑 행동에 미치는 영향. 혁 신기술수용모델을 중심으로. 광고연구, 63, 79-101
  8. 손미숙 .박준석 . 한동원 . 조일연 (2006) 웨어러블 시스템 사용자 상호작용 시장 분석 및 기술 동향. 전자통신동향분석, 21(2), 184-191
  9. 유재미 (2004) 인식된 제품 혁신성과 제품 수용 의향의 관계- 서울 대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  10. 육형민 (2003) 스마트 재킷 디자인을 위한 사용성 평가척도 개발. 연 세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  11. 이은영 (1997) '패션마케팅' 교문사, 서울, p.l22
  12. 이정순 (2002) 스마트 의복의 전망 및 개발사례 연구. 충남생활과학 연구지, 15(1). 64-75
  13. 조길수 . 김주영 . 김화연 . 이명은 . 이선 (2000) '디지털 의복'. 섬유기술과 산업, 4(1), 148-157
  14. 홍병숙 . 오현주 (2002) 인터넷 쇼핑의 혁신성과 위험 지각에 따른 의류상품 구매 행동. 중앙대학교 생활과학논집, 14, 233-256
  15. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information System Research, 9(2), 204-215 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  16. Chattopadhyay, A. and Basu, K. (1990) Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 466-476 https://doi.org/10.2307/3172631
  17. Cho G., Barfield W and Baird K. (1998) Wearable computers, 섬유기술과 산업, 2(4), 490-508
  18. Citrin, AV. Sprott, D.E., Silverman, S.N. and Stem, D.E.Jr. (2000) Adoption of Internet shopping: The role of consumer innovativeness. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 100(7), 294-300 https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570010304806
  19. Corey, L,G. (1971) People who claim to be opinion leaders: Identifying their characteristics by self-reporter. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 48-53 https://doi.org/10.2307/1249914
  20. Edwards C. (2003) Wearable computing struggles for social acceptance. lEE Review, October, 24-25
  21. Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D. and Miniard, P.W (1995) 'Consumer Behavior'. 8th Ed., Forth Worth, TX: Dryden, p.362
  22. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) 'Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior'. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley
  23. Goldsmith, R.E. (2001) Using the domain specific innovativeness scale to identify innovative Internet consumers. Internet Research, 11(2), 149-158 https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240110695098
  24. Goldsmith, R.E. and Flynn, L,R (1992) Identifying innovators in consumer product markets. European Journal of Marketing, 26, 42-55 https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569210022498
  25. Goldsmith, R.E. and Hofacker, C.F. (1991) Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 19(3), 209-221 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726497
  26. Hurt, H.T. and Joseph, K. (1977) Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x
  27. Kilbourne, W.E. (1986) An exploratory study of sex role stereotyping on attitude toward magazine advertisement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 14(4), 43-46
  28. Mann, S. (1998) Wearable computing as means for personal impowerment, Keynote address for The First International Conference on Wearable Computing, ICWC-98
  29. Midgley, D.F. and Dowling, G.R (1978) Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 229-242 https://doi.org/10.1086/208701
  30. Rogers, E.M. (1995) 'Diffusion of Innovations'. 5th Ed., The Free Press, New York, pp.263-280
  31. Solomon, M.R. (2002) 'Consumer Behavior : Buying, Haring and Being'. 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Vpper Saddle River, NJ., p.199
  32. Venture Development Cooperation (2005) 'Wearable System: Global Market Demand Analysis'. 2nd Ed
  33. Workman, J.E. and Johnson, K.K.P. (1993) Fashion opinion leadership, fashion innovativeness, and need for variety. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11(3), 60-64 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9301100309
  34. Wearable computer market to grow 500% by '06 (2003, March 14). Venture Development Cooperation. Retrieved April 5, 2006, from http://www.vdc-corp.com