유착성 관절낭염에 대한 침 및 신경차단술 처치의 임상적 관찰

Clinical Observation of Acupuncture and Nerve Block Treatment for Adhesive Capsulitis Patients

  • 남동우 (경희대학교 한의과대학 침구과교실) ;
  • 임사비나 (경희대학교 한의과대학 경혈학교실) ;
  • 김종인 (경희대학교 한의과대학 침구과교실) ;
  • 김건식 (경희대학교 의과대학 마취통증의과학교실) ;
  • 이두익 (경희대학교 의과대학 마취통증의과학교실) ;
  • 이재동 (경희대학교 한의과대학 침구과교실) ;
  • 이윤호 (경희대학교 한의과대학 침구과교실) ;
  • 최도영 (경희대학교 한의과대학 침구과교실)
  • Nam, Dong-Woo (Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lim, Sabina (Department of Meridianology, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-In (Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Keon-Sik (Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Doo-Ik (Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Dong (Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Yun-Ho (Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Do-Young (Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2007.08.20

초록

Objectives: To observe the effect of acupuncture and nerve block combination treatment on adhesive capsulitis patients. Methods : 59 voluntary patients were randomly assigned to acupuncture treatment group(E group, n=22), nerve block treatment group(W group, n=17) and acupuncture and nerve block combination treatment group(EW group, n=20). The E group received acupuncture treatment on LI15, $TE_{14}$, $GB_{21}$ and Master Dong's acupuncture points, Shin-gwan and Gyun-joong, twice a week for 4 weeks. The W group received suprascapular nerve block, subacromial injection and trigger point injection, twice a week for 4 weeks. The EW group received the same treatment as the W group and after 5minutes of rest, successively received the treatment identical to that of E group. All three groups were instructed to practice groups were instructed to practice self exercise during their daily lives. Evaluations were made before treatment and after 1, 2, 3 and 4week treatment. Constant Shoulder Assessment(CSA), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index(SPADI), Range of Motion(ROM), the patient's treatment satisfaction measured by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) and Digital Infrared Thermographic Imaging(DITI) were used as assessment tools. The obtained data were analyzed and compared. Results : The E group showed significant improvement(p<0.05) on CSA, SPADI, VAS and DITI. As for ROM, Adduction and Extension improved significantly(p<0.05). The W group showed significant improvement(p<0.05) on CSA, SPADI, VAS and DITI. As for ROM, Abduction and Extension improved significantly. The EW group showed significant improvement(p<0.05) on CSA, SPADI and VAS. As for ROM, Adduction, Abduction, Extension and Flexion improved significantly. The improvement of CSA, VAS and Abduction ROM in the EW group was significantly(p<0.05) superior compared to the groups treated with single type of treatment. Conclusion : It is suggested that acupuncture and nerve block combination treatment for adhesive capsulitis patients is more effective than the two single treatments. Through further studies, the acupuncture and nerve block combination treatment model may be developed into East-West Collaboration Model in treating adhesive capsulitis.

키워드