A Study on Leadership and Management Effectiveness : A Multi-Frame Perspective - Focusing on the railway-related organizations -

다원적 리더십과 그 효과성에 관한 일 연구 - 철도관련 조직을 중심으로 -

  • 이현주 (서울산업대학교 철도전문대학원) ;
  • 신택현 (서울산업대학교 철도전문대학원 철도경영정책학과)
  • Published : 2007.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to depict the relationship between the frames of leadership and the dependent variables such as job satisfaction, respect from subordinates, promotion, and effective attainment of unit objectives. To attain this purpose, four types of multiple leadership frame, such as structural, human resources, political, and symbolic frames were surveyed through questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS. The major findings are : 1) In general, the symbolic frame is an important factor having a stronger influence on job satisfaction, respect from subordinates, promotion, and effective attainment of unit objectives. 2) In details, the human resources frame shows a positive effects on job satisfaction and respect; the structural frame on effective attainment of unit objectives; the political frame, to a certain degree, on promotion; and the symbolic frame, especially on respect from subordinates, promotion, and effective attainment of unit objectives.

Keywords

References

  1. 신택현 역 (2004), ${\ulcorner}$ 조직의 리프레이밍 ${\lrcorner}$, (원저서명:Lee G. Bolman & Terrence E. Deal, ReframingOrganizations, 3rd ed., 2003, Jossey-Bass Publishers), 지샘
  2. Lord, R. G. & Foti, R. J. (1986), Scheme theories, information processing, and organizational behavior, In Sims, H. P., Gioia, D. A., et al.(Eds.), The Thinking Organization, Sanfrancisco: Jossey-Bass
  3. Weick,, K. & Bougon, M. G. (1986), Organization as cognitive maps. In Sims, H. P., Gioia, D. A., et al.(Eds.), The Thinking Organization, Sanfrancisco:Jossey-Bass
  4. Morgan G. (1986), Images of organization, Beverly Hills, Sage
  5. Frensch, P. A. & Sternberg, R. J. (1991), Skill-related differences in chess playing, In Sternberg, R. J. & Frensch, P. A.(Eds.), Complex problem-solving, New Jersey: Erlbaum
  6. Kuhn, T. S.(1970), The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  7. Mitroff, J. I. (1985), Why our old pictures of the world do not work anymore, In Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, A. M., Mohrman, S. A., Ledford, G. E., & Cummings, T. G. (Eds.), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice, Sanfrancisco:Jossey-Bass
  8. Brief, A. P. & Downey, H. K. (1983), Cognitive and organizational structure: A conceptual analysis of implicit organizing theories, Human Relations, 36, 1065-1090 https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303601201
  9. 金井壽宏 (2006), 働くみんなのモティベション論, NTT 出版, 第1章
  10. 김영신 역 (2004), 대화의 심리학, 21세기북스
  11. Lee G. Bolman & T. E. Deal (1991), 'Leadership and Management Effectiveness: A Multi-Frame, Multi-Sector Analysis', Human Resource Management, Vol.30, No 4, pp.509-533 https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930300406