Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy after Breast Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer: An Intermediate Result

침윤성 유방암에서 유방보존수술 후 방사선치료 및 항암화학 병용치료의 성적 및 위험인자 분석

  • Lee, Seok-Ho (Departments of Radiation Oncology, Gachon Medical School) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Ho (Departments of Radiation Oncology, Gachon Medical School) ;
  • Lee, Young-Don (Departments of Surgery, Gachon Medical School) ;
  • Park, Heoung-Kyu (Departments of Surgery, Gachon Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Young (Departments of Surgery, Gachon Medical School) ;
  • Park, Se-Hoon (Departments of Internal Medicine, Gachon Medical School) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Chan (Departments of Radiation Oncology, Gachon Medical School)
  • 이석호 (가천의과학대학교 의학전문대학원 방사선종양학교실) ;
  • 최진호 (가천의과학대학교 의학전문대학원 방사선종양학교실) ;
  • 이영돈 (가천의과학대학교 의학전문대학원 외과학교실) ;
  • 박흥규 (가천의과학대학교 의학전문대학원 외과학교실) ;
  • 김현영 (가천의과학대학교 의학전문대학원 외과학교실) ;
  • 박세훈 (가천의과학대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 이규찬 (가천의과학대학교 의학전문대학원 방사선종양학교실)
  • Published : 2007.03.31

Abstract

[ $\underline{Purpose}$ ]: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by chemotherapy (CTx.) and radiation therapy (RT) is widely performed for the treatment of early breast cancer. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate our interim results in terms of failure patterns, survival and relative risk factors. $\underline{Materials\;and\;Methods}$: From January 1999 through December 2003, 129 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and treated with BCS followed by RT were subject to retrospective review. The median age of the patients was 45 years (age distribution, $27{\sim}76$ years). The proportions of patients according to their tumor, nodes, and metastases (TNM) stage were 65 (50.4%) in stage I, 41 (31.7%) in stage IIa, 13 (10.1%) in stage IIb, 9 (7.0%) in stage III, and 1 patient (0.8%) in stage IIIc. For 32 patients (24.8%), axillary node metastasis was found after dissection. BCS consisted of quadrantectomy in 115 patients (89.1%) and lumpectomy in 14 patients (10.6%). Axillary node dissection at axillary level I and II was performed for 120 patients (93%). For 7 patients (5.4%), only sentinel node dissection was performed with BCS. For 2 patients (1.6%) axillary dissection of any type was not performed. Postoperative RT was given with 6 MV X-rays. A tumor dose of 50.4 Gy was delivered to the entire breast area using a tangential field with a wedge compensator. An aditional dose of $9{\sim}16\;Gy$ was given to the primary tumor bed areas with electron beams. In 30 patients (23.3%), RT was delivered to the supraclavicular node. Most patients had adjuvant CTx. with $4{\sim}6$ cycles of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) regimens. The median follow-up period was 50 months (range: $17{\sim}93$ months). $\underline{Results}$: The actuarial 5 year survival rate (5Y-OSR) was 96.9%, and the 5 year disease free survival rate (5Y-DFSR) was 93.7%. Local recurrences were noted in 2 patients (true: 2, regional node: 1) as the first sign of recurrence at a mean time of 29.3 months after surgery. Five patients developed distant metastases as the first sign of recurrence at $6{\sim}33$ months (mean 21 months). Sites of distant metastatic sites were bone in 3 patients, liver in 1 patient and systemic lesions in 1 patient. Among the patients with distant metastatic sites, two patients died at 17 and 25 months during the follow-up period. According to stage, the 5Y-OSR was 95.5%, 100%, 84.6%, and 100% for stage I, IIa, IIb, and III respectively. The 5Y-DFSR was 96.8%, 92.7%, 76.9%, and 100% for stage I, IIa, IIb, and III respectively. Stage was the only risk factor for local recurrence based on univariate analysis. Ten stage III patients included in this analysis had a primary tumor size of less than 3 cm and had more than 4 axillary lymph node metastases. The 10 stage III patients received not only breast RT but also received posterior axillary boost RT to the supraclavicular node. During the median 53.3 months follow-up period, no any local or distant failure was found. Complications were asymptomatic radiation pneumonitis in 10 patients, symptomatic pneumonitis in 1 patient and lymphedema in 8 patients. $\underline{Conclusion}$: Although our follow up period is short, we had excellent local control and survival results and reaffirmed that BCS followed by RT and CTx. appears to be an adequate treatment method. These results also provide evidence that distant failure occurs earlier and more frequent as compared with local failure. Further studies and a longer follow-up period are needed to assess the effectiveness of BCS followed by RT for the patients with less than a 3 cm primary tumor and more than 4 axillary node metastases.

목 적: 조기병기 유방암에서 유방보존수술 후 방사선치료 및 항암화학 병용요법이 보편화되면서 표준적치료로 인정되고 있다. 유방보존치료를 받은 환자들을 대상으로 수년 이내의 재발양상, 생존율 및 그에 관련되는 위험인자를 알아보기 위하여 본 연구를 시행하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1999년 1월부터 2003년 12월까지 관내상피암을 제외한 침윤성 유방암으로 유방보존수술 후 방사선 치료를 시행 받은 129명의 환자를 대상으로 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 전체 환자의 중앙연령은 45세($27{\sim}76$세)이었고, 연령대로는 40대가 62명(48.1%)으로 가장 많았다. TNM 병기는 I기 65명(50.4%), IIa기 41명(31.7%), IIb기 13명(10.1%), IIIa기 9명(7.0%), IIIc기 1명(0.7%)이었다. 액와림프절 전이가 있었던 환자는 32명(24.8%)이었다. 수술은 사분원절제술이 115명(89.1%), 종괴절제술이 14명(10.9%)에서 시행되었다. 액와림프절곽청술은 120명(93%)에서 시행되었다. 방사선치료는 동측 전체 유방에 6 MV X-선으로 50.4 Gy를 28회에 걸쳐 시행하고, 원발병소에 $9{\sim}16\;Gy$를 추가하였다. 쇄골상 림프절 방사선치료를 받은 환자는 30명(23.3 %)이었다. 항암화학요법은 대부분 CMF요법으로 $4{\sim}6$회가 시행되었다. 전체환자의 중앙 추적관찰기간은 50개월($17{\sim}93$개월)이었다. 결 과: 5년 생존율은 96.9%, 5년 무병 생존율은 93.7%이었다. 병기별 5년 생존율은 I기 97.1%, IIa기 100%, IIb기 84.6%, III기 100%이었고, 5년 무병생존율은 I기 96.8%, IIa기 92.7%, IIb기 76.9%, III기 100%이었다. 유방내 국소재발은 2명(1.6%)에서 발생하였고, 동측 쇄골상 림프절 재발이 1명(0.8%), 원격전이는 5명(3.9%)에서 발생하였다. 국소재발의 평균 기간은 32.5개월이었다. 원격전이는 평균 21개월에 발생하였고, 골전이 3명, 간전이 1명, 전신전이 1명이었다. 이 중 2명이 각각 17개월, 25개월에 사망하였다. 예후인자 분석에서 병기만이 단변량 분석에서 유의하였다. 본 연구에는 III기 환자가 10명 포함되었는데, 원발병소의 크기는 모두 3 cm 이하였으며, 액와림프절 전이가 4개 이상인 경우였다. 이들은 모두 액와부 및 쇄골상부 방사선치료를 받았으며, 추적기간 동안 국소재발이나 원격전이 소견은 발견되지 않았다. 부작용으로는 10명(7.8%)에서 무증상방사선폐렴이 있었으며 증상을 동반한 방사선 폐렴이 1명(0.8%) 그리고 상지부종이 10명(7.8%)에서 있었다. 결 론: 추적기간이 짧았지만 조기 병기 침윤성 유방암에서 유방보존수술 후 방사선치료 및 항암화학요법을 시행하여 높은 국소 제어율과 생존율을 얻었으며, 향후 장기적인 추적관찰이 필요할 것으로 사료된다. 유방내 국소 재발은 수년 내에는 적었으며, 원격전이는 상대적으로 일찍 발생함을 알 수 있었다. 또한, 원발병소의 크기가 3 cm 이하로 작고, 액와림프절 전이가 4개 이상인 환자를 대상으로 유방보존치료 적용가능 여부에 대한 장기적 추적관찰 및 추가적 분석이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Forrest AP, Stewart HJ, Everington D, et al. Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6- year analysis of the Scottish trial. Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group. Lancet 1996;348:708- 713 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02133-2
  2. Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Bergh J, et al. 10- Year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2326- 2333 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2326
  3. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty- year follow- up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233- 1241 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152
  4. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty- year follow- up of a randomized study comparing breast- conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227- 1232 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020989
  5. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen- year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer 2003;98:697- 702 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11580
  6. Sacchini V, Luini A, Tana S, et al. Quantitive and qualitive consmetic evaluation after conservative treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:1395- 1400 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379(91)90019-A
  7. Dewar JA, Benhamou S, Benhamou E, et al. Cosmetic results following lumpectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy for small breast cancers. Radiother Oncol 1988;12: 273- 280 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(88)90016-3
  8. Kim BK, Shin SS, Kim SD, Noh DY, Ha SH. Cosmetic results of conservative early breast cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol 2001;19:21- 26
  9. Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Hellman S. Disease of the breast. 1st ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott- Raven, 1996:461
  10. Komoike Y, Motomura K, Inaji H, et al. Long term results of breast conserving surgery for stage I and II breast cancer: experiences at Osaka medical center for cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Breast Cancer 2002;9:248- 253 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967597
  11. NIH Consensus Conference. Treatment of early stage breast cancer. JAMA 1991;265:391 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.265.3.391
  12. Suh CO, Shin HS, Cho JH, et al. The 1998, 1999 patterns of care study for breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in Korea. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol 2004;22:192- 199
  13. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Republic of Korea. Annual report of the central cancer registry in Korea (2001.1- 2001.12), 2003
  14. Halsted WS. A clinical and histological study of certain adenocarcinoma of the breast: and a brief consideration of the supraclavicular operation and of the results of operation for cancer of the breast from 1889 to 1898 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Ann Surg 1898;28:557- 576
  15. Keynes G. Conservative treatment of cancer of the breast. BMJ 1937;2:643- 647 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.4004.643
  16. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981;305:6- 11 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198107023050102
  17. Jung SS, You YK, Park CH, Kim IC. Recent trends of breast cancer treatment in Korea. J Korean Surg Soc 1991; 41:717- 726
  18. Ahn SH. Clinical characteristics of breast cancer patients in Korea in 2000. Arch Surg 2004;139:27- 30 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.1.27
  19. Nattinger AB, Gottleib MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS. Geographic variation in the use of breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1102 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199204233261702
  20. Gregorio DI, Kulldorff M, Barry L, et al. Geographical differences in primary therapy for early- stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:844- 849 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0844-4
  21. Samet JM, Hunt WC, Farrow DC. Determinants of receiving breast- conserving surgery. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end result program, 1983- 1986. Cancer 1994;73:2344
  22. Shin HS, Lee HS, Chang SK, et al. The national survey of breast cancer treatment pattern in Korea (1998): the use of breast- conserving treatment. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol 2004; 22:184- 191
  23. The Korean Breast Cancer Society. Nationwide Korean Breast Cancer data of 2002. J Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:72- 83 https://doi.org/10.4048/jkbcs.2004.7.2.72
  24. Ahn SH, Yoo KY. The Korean Breast Cancer Society. Chronological changes of clinical characteristics in 31,115 new breast cancer patients among Koreans during 1996- 2004. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;99:209- 214 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9188-x
  25. Koh KH, Kim MS, Yoo SY, et al. The results of primary radiotherapy following breast- conserving surgery for early breast cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol 1995;13:163- 172
  26. Suh CO, Chung EJ, Lee HD, Lee KS, Oh KK, Kim GE. Risk factors for recurrence after conservative treatment in early breast cancer; preliminary report. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol 1997;15:331- 338
  27. Hong SG, Lee JH, Lee SK, Yoon SO. Breast- conserving surgery with or without radiation therapy for eearly breast cancer. J Korean Surg Soc 1998;55:341- 349
  28. Suh CO, Lee HD, Lee KS, Jung WH, Oh KK, Kim GE. Conservative surgery and primary radiotherapy for early breast cancer; Yonsei Cancer Center experience. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol 1994;12:337- 347
  29. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow- up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 11456- 11461
  30. Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, et al. Radiotherapy after breast- conserving surgery in small breast carcinoma: long- term results of a randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2001;12: 997- 1003 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011136326943
  31. Recht A, Silen W, Schnitt SJ, et al. Time- course of local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;15: 255- 261 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(98)90002-5
  32. Kim YS, Yoon SC, Chung SM, Ryu MR, Jung SS, Choi IB. Breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy- preliminary results of pattern of failure and survival rate in early breast cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol 2004;22: 115- 123
  33. Kim KJ, Huh SJ, Yang JH, et al. Treatment results and prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with a breast conserving operation and radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005; 35:126- 133 https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyi039
  34. Grills IS, Kestin LL, Goldstein N, et al. Risk factors for regional nodal failure after breast- conserving therapy: regional nodal irradiation reduces rate of axillary failure in patients with four or more positive lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;56:658- 670 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00017-8
  35. Ghossein NA, Alpert S, Barba J, et al. Breast cancer. Importance of adequate surgical excision prior to radiotherapy in the local control of breast cancer in patients treated conservatively. Arch Surg 1992;127:411- 415 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420040053009
  36. Dalberg K, Mattsson A, Rutqvist LE, Johansson U, Riddez L, Sandelin K. Breast conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997;43:73- 86 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005732224717
  37. Osteen RT. Risk factors and management of local recurrence following breast conservation surgery. World J Surg 1995;18:76- 80
  38. Levine MN, Pritchard KI, Bramwell VH, Shepherd LE, Tu D, Paul N. Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node- positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5166- 5170 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.09.423
  39. Mamounas EP, Bryant J, Lembersky B, et al. Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node- positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B- 28. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3686- 3696 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.10.517
  40. Recht A, Come SE, Gelman RS, et al. Integration of conservative surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for the treatment of early- stage, node positive breast cancer: sequencing, timing, and outcome. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:1662- 1667 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1991.9.9.1662
  41. Recht A, Come SE, Henderson IC, et al. The sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy after conserving surgery for early breast cancer. N England J Med 1996;334:1356- 1361 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199605233342102
  42. Fyles AW, McCready DR, Manchul LA, et al. Tamoxifen with or without breast irradiation in women 50 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N England J Med 2004;351: 963- 970 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040595
  43. Taghian AG, Assaad SI, Niemierko A, Floyd SR, Powell SN. Is a reduction in radiation lung volume and dose necessary with paclitaxel chemotherapy for node- positive breast cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;62:386- 391