DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Muscle Architecture on Force Enhancement Following Muscle Lengthening

근육 구조특성과 선행 신장성 수축에 의한 항정상태 등척성 근력 증대와의 연관성에 대한 연구

  • Lee, Hae-Dong (BK21 Mechatronics Group, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Hyun (BK21 Mechatronics Group, Chungnam National University)
  • 이해동 (BK21 메카트로닉스 사업단, 충남대학교) ;
  • 이중현 (BK21 메카트로닉스 사업단, 충남대학교)
  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

When an active muscle is stretched, its steady-state isometric force following stretch is greater than that of a purely isometric contraction as the corresponding muscle length, referred to as force enhancement (FE). The purpose of this study was to investigate possible effects of muscle architecture on the FE. While subject performed maximal isometric dorsiflexion (REF) and isometric-stretch-isometric dorsiflexion (ECC) contractions, ankle joint angle and dorsiflexion torque using a dynamometer and electromyography of the tibialis anterior and the medical gastrocnemius muscles were measure. Simultaneously, real-time ultrasound images of the tibialis anterior were acquired. Regardless of the speed of stretch of the ECC contractions. the torques produced during the isometric phase following stretch ($37.3{\pm}1.5\;Nm$ ($10{\pm}3%$ FE) and $38.3{\pm}1.5$ ($12{\pm}3%$ FE) for the ECC contractions with $15^{\circ}$/s and $45^{\circ}$/s stretch speeds, respectively) were greater than those of the REF contractions ($34.5{\pm}2.5\;Nm$). Moreover, the amount of FE was found to be stretch speed dependent. Angles of pennation ($\alpha$) during the isometric phase following stretch were the same for the REF ($15{\pm}1^{\circ}$) and the ECC ($14{\pm}1^{\circ}$(LS), $15{\pm}1^{\circ}$(LF)). During the same phase, muscle thicknesses were the same ($14.9{\pm}0.6$, and $14.9{\pm}0.5\;mm$ for the REF and the ECC contractions, respectively). For a large limb muscle, the tibialis anterior muscle, a similar amount of force enhancement was observed as did for other human skeletal muscles. Architectural variables, pennation angle and thickness, were not systematically different between the REF and ECC contractions when FE occurred. Therefore, the results of this study suggest that muscle architecture may have little influence on the production of FE.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott BC & Aubert XM (1952). The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length. Journal of Physiology 117, 77-86.
  2. Cook CS & McDonagh MJ (1995). Force responses to controlled stretches of electrically stimulated human muscle-tendon complex. Experimental Physiology 80, 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.1995.sp003862
  3. de Ruiter CJ, Didden WJM, Jones DA, & de Haan A (2000). The force-velocity relationship of human adductor pollicis muscle during stretch and the effects of fatigue. Journal of Physiology 526, 671-681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00671.x
  4. Edman KA, Elzinga G, & Noble MI (1978). Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. Journal of Physiology 281, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012413
  5. Edman KA, Elzinga G, & Noble MI (1982). Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers. Journal of General Physiology 80, 769-784. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.80.5.769
  6. Edman KA & Tsuchiya T (1996). Strain of passive elements during force enhancement by stretch in frog muscle fibres. Journal of Physiology 490, 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021135
  7. Finni T, Ikegawa S, Lepola V, & Komi PV (2003). Comparison of force-velocity relationships of vastus lateralis muscle in isokinetic and in stretch-shortening cycle exercises. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 177, 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01069.x
  8. Gans C (1982). Fiber architecture and muscle function. Exercise and Sports Science Review 10, 160-207.
  9. Herzog W (2007). History-dependent properties in skeletal muscle contraction. The XXI Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. Taipei, Taiwan.
  10. Herzog W & Leonard TR (1997). Depression of cat soleus-forces following isokinetic shortening. Journal of Biomechanics 30, 865-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00046-8
  11. Herzog W & Leonard TR (2002). Force enhancement following stretching of skeletal muscle: a new mechanism. Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 1275-1283.
  12. Huijing PA (2007). Epimuscular myofascial force transmission, its ubiquitous presence across muscles and species, and some of its history, effects and functional consequences. Muybridge Award Lecture. The XXI Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. Taipei, Taiwan.
  13. Huijing PA & Woittiez RD (1984). The effect of architecture on skeletal-muscle performance - a simple planimetric model. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 34, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1163/002829684X00029
  14. Ito M, Kawakami Y & Ichinose Y (1998). Nonisometric behavior of fascicles during isometric contractions of a human muscle. Journal of Applied Physiology 85, 1230-1235.
  15. Lee HD & Herzog W (2002). Force enhancement following muscle stretch of electrically stimulated and voluntarily activated human adductor pollicis. Journal of Physiology 545, 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.018010
  16. Linari M, Lucii L, Reconditi M, Casoni ME, Amenitsch H, Bernstorff S, Piazzesi G, & Lombardi V (2000). A combined mechanical and X-ray diffraction study of stretch potentiation in single frog muscle fibres. Journal of Physiology 526, 589-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00589.x
  17. Morgan DL, Whitehead NP, Wise AK, Gregory JE, & Proske U (2000). Tension changes in the cat soleus muscle following slow stretch or shortening of the contracting muscle. Journal of Physiology 522, 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-2-00503.x
  18. Oskouei AE & Herzog W (2005). Observations on force enhancement in submaximal voluntary contractions of human adductor pollicis muscle. Journal of Applied Physiology 98, 2087-2095. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01217.2004
  19. Peterson DR, Rassier DE & Herzog W (2004). Force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibers on the ascending limb of the force-length relationship. Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2787-2791. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01095
  20. Pinniger GJ & Cresswell AG (2007). Residual force enhancement after lengthening is present during submaximal planter flexion and dorsiflexion actions in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology 102, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00565.2006
  21. Rassier DE, Herzog W, & Pollack GH (2003). Stretch-induced force enhancement and stability of skeletal muscle myofibrils. Advanced Experimental Medicine and Biology 538, 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9029-7_45
  22. Reeves ND & Narici MV (2003). Behavior of human muscle fascicles during shortening and lengthening contractions in vivo. Journal of Applied Physiology 95, 1090-1096.
  23. Sugi H & Tsuchiya T (1988). Stiffness changes during enhancement and deficit of isometric force by slow length changes in frog skeletal muscle fibres. Journal of Physiology 407, 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017411
  24. Westing SH, Cresswell AG, & Thorstensson A (1991). Muscle activation during maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric knee extension. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 62, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00626764
  25. Zuurbier CJ & Huijing PA (1991). Influence of muscle shortening on the geometry of gastrocnemius medialis muscle of the rat. Acta Anatomica (Basel) 140, 292-303.