DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Biomechanical Analysis of Judo's Kuzushi(balance-breaking) Motion

유도 팔방기울이기 동작의 생체역학적 특성 분석

  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to biomechanical analysis Judo's Kuzushi throwing motion in order to increase the effectiveness of Nage-waja(throwing technique). The Tori was a Judo player with 18 years experience(4th degree) while the Uke was a player with 2 years experience(1st degree). The kinematic data was captured using the Vicon motion system (7 cameras) and the kinetics were recorded by force plates(2 AMTI). The following were the results; While leaning to the front the subject's trunk's angle was $14.5^{\circ}$, the lower limbs angle was $23.8^{\circ}$, knee angle was $179.6^{\circ}$ and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 325.42N(BW 0.34) and the right leg was 233.7N(BW 0.47). While leaning back the subject's trunk's angle was $11.3^{\circ}$, the lower limbs angle was $4.1^{\circ}$, knee angle was $1761^{\circ}$ and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 299.53N(BW 0.43) and the right leg was 441.7N(BW 0.64). While leaning to the left the subject's trunk's angle was $30.8^{\circ}$, the lower limbs angle was $2.7^{\circ}$, knee angle was $175.2^{\circ}$ and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 711N(BW 1.03) and the right leg was 9.2N(BW 0.01). While leaning to the right the subject's trunk's angle was $36.5^{\circ}$, the lower limbs angle was $10.4^{\circ}$, knee angle was $175.2^{\circ}$ and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 13.2N(BW 0.02) and the right leg was 694.7N(BW 1.01). While leaning to the left front corner the subject's trunk's angle was $19.8^{\circ}$ (front) and $15.1^{\circ}$ (left), the lower limbs angle was $17.8^{\circ}$ (front) and $2.4^{\circ}$ (left), knee angle was $177.8^{\circ}$ (front) and $173.9^{\circ}$(left), and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 547.4N(BW 0.8) and the right leg was 117.8N(BW 0.17). While leaning to the right front corner the subject's trunk's angle was $15.4^{\circ}$ (front) and $17.7^{\circ}$ (right), the lower limbs angle was $21.1^{\circ}$, (front) and $5.7^{\circ}$ (right), knee angle was $175.5^{\circ}$ (front) and $178.9^{\circ}$(right), and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 53N(BW 0.08) and the right leg was 622.4N(BW 09). While leaning to the left rear corner the subject's trunk's angle was $9.2^{\circ}$ (back) and $13.8^{\circ}$ (left), the lower limbs angle was $2^{\circ}$, (back) and $5.7^{\circ}$ (left), knee angle was $175.5^{\circ}$ (back) and $172.8^{\circ}$(left), and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 698.2N(BW 1.02) and the right leg was 49.6N(BW 0.07). While leaning to the right rear corner the subject's trunk's angle was $8.9^{\circ}$ (back) and $19.6^{\circ}$ (right), the lower limbs angle was ${0.6^{\circ}}_"$ (back) and $3.1^{\circ}$ (right), knee angle was $174.6^{\circ}$ (back) and $175.6^{\circ}$(right), and the vertical reaction of the left leg was 7.2N(BW 0.01) and the right leg was 749.4N(BW 1.09). It was observed that during the Judo motion Kuzushii the range of the COM varied from $26.5{\sim}39.9cm$. It was concluded that the upper body leaned further than the lower body as there was knee extension. There was high left leg reaction forces while leaning to the left and likewise for the right side. It was therefore deduced that the Kuzushi was a more effective throwing technique for the left side.

Keywords

References

  1. 권문석, 김의환, 조동희(2002). 유도 맞잡기 타입과 받기의 신장에 따른 허벅다리걸기의 Kinematic 분석(2). 한국운동역학회지 제 12권 2호. pp. 143-157.
  2. 김의환((2001), 유도 : 초보자를 위한 유도과학교실, PP. 64-67. 서울 : 대한유도회.
  3. 김의환(1988). 유도 외깃 업어치기의 생체역학적 분석. 스포츠과학정보, 2, pp. 1-20.
  4. 김의환(2001). 유도 우수선수 업어치기의 3차원 역학적 특성 프로화일, 한국운동역학회지 제 10권 2호, pp. 115-138.
  5. 김의환(2004). 유도 : 초보자를 위한 유도과학교실 pp. 48-51, 서울 : 대한유도회
  6. 김의환, 김성섭(2004). 유도 단계별 측방낙법의 운동학적 변인 비교분석. 한국운동역학회지 제 14권 3호. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2004.14.3.203
  7. 김의환, 김성섭, 정재욱(2005). 유도 허벅다리걸기 기술 발휘 시 받기의 자세와 저항수준에 따른 중심변인 분석(2). 한국운동역학회지 제 15권 1호, pp. 237-258. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2005.15.1.237
  8. 김의환, 김지태(2002). 유도 전방낙법의 운동학적 특성분석[1], 한국운동역학회지 제 12권 2호.
  9. 김의환, 윤현(2003). 유도 양팔업어치기 패턴에 따른 공격팔 기울이기 동작의 운동학적 분석. 한국운동역학회지 제 13권 1호, pp. 73-94. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2003.13.1.073
  10. 김의환, 윤현, 김성섭(2004). 유도 허벅다리걸기 기술발휘 시 받기의 자세와 저항수준에 따른 운동학적 특성 사례연구(1). 한국운동역학회지 제14권 3호, pp. 203-218. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2004.14.3.235
  11. 김의환, 정재욱, 김성섭(2005). 유도 공중회전낙법의 COG변인 분석, 한국운동역학회지 15권 3호. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2005.15.3.117
  12. 김종식(1998). 대학 유도선수의 체력특성에 따른 요인 분석. 미간행 석사학위논문, 한국체육대학교대학원.
  13. 김지태, 허성규(2006). 유도 맞잡기 유형에 따른 양손업어치기의 동작의 운동학적 분석(1). 한국운동역학회지 제 16권 2호, pp. 45-54. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2006.16.2.045
  14. 박태춘(2001). 유도 후방낙법의 운동학적 특성 분석. 미간행 석사학위논문. 용인대학교 교육대학원.
  15. 선성휴, 손명성, 김원섭, 강성철(1998). 유도 기술 중 허벅다리걸기의 운동학적 특성. 한국운동역학회지 제 8권 2호. pp. 103-123.
  16. http://100.empas.com/dicsearch/pentry.html/?s=K&i=298836
  17. http://cafe.daum.net/kalvaryjudo