BCG가 Ehrlich 암세포를 이식한 생쥐의 막창자꼬리점막 흡수세포의 미세구조에 미치는 영향

Effects of BCG on the Absorptive Cells in the Appendix of the Mouse Implanted with Ehrlich Carcinoma Cells

  • 이운우 (순천향대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 박경호 (순천향대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김명수 (한서대학교 보건학부 방사선학과) ;
  • 박대균 (순천향대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 고정식 (순천향대학교 의과대학 해부학교실)
  • Lee, Woon-Woo (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Park, Kyung-Ho (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Myeong-Soo (Department of Radiological Science, Division of Health Science, Hanseo University) ;
  • Park, Dae-Kyoon (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Ko, Jeong-Sik (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine Soonchunhyang University)
  • 발행 : 2007.09.30

초록

Ehrlich 암세포를 샅부위에 이식한 후 BCG를 투여하였을 때 생쥐 막창자꼬리점막 흡수세포의 미세구조적 변화를 관찰하였다. 실험동물로는 체중 25 gm내외의 성숙한 생쥐 (ICR계통)를 정상대조군, 암세포이식대조군, BCG투여군으로 구분하였다. 암세포이식대조군과 BCG투여군 동물들은 샅부위 피부밑조직에 각각$1{\times}10^7$의 Ehrlich 암세포를 주사하여 이식하였다. 암세포이식대조군은 암세포이식 후에 약제 대신 0.5mL의 생리식염수를, BCG 투여군은 일정량(0.5 mL/25 gm B.W.: $0.03{\times}10^8{\sim}0.32{\times}10^8CFU$)의 BCG를 하루건너 한 번씩 7번 피부밑조직에 주사하였다. 절취된 막창자꼬리조직은 통상적인 방법으로 고정 및 탈수과정을 거쳐 araldite 혼합액에 포매하여 절편을 만든 다음 JEM 100CX-II(JEOL, Japan)전자현미경으로 비교 관찰하였다. 정상군 막창자꼬리점막의 흡수세포는 미세융모, 골지복합체, 과립세포질세망 및 자유면쪽의 미세소포 등, 미세구조가 전형적인 소화관 흡수세포의 것과 유사하였다. 암세포이식대조군의 흡수세포는 자유면쪽에 미세융모가 매우 조밀하게 형성되고 작은 소포들이 다수 관찰되고, 다수의 사립체, 잘 발달된 골지복합체, 과립세포질세망 및 용해소체를 포함하고 있는 모습이 정상대조군의 모습과 유사하였다. BCG투여군의 흡수세포는 세포소기관의 미세구조를 비롯한 전체적인 모습이 정상대조군의 모습과 유사하였으나 세포질 내에 말이집구조를 포함하고 있는 세포들이 자주 관찰되었으며, 사립체에 전자밀도가 높은 과립모양의 구조를 포함하고 있는 세포들이 비교적 자주 관찰되었다. 이상의 결과를 종합하여 보면 BCG를 반복 투여하면 막창자꼬리점막의 흡수세포는 미세구조에 다소 손상을 받아 흡수기능이 다소 억제되나 그 정도가 매우 경미하였으므로 BCG는 막창자꼬리점막 흡수세포의 기능에 큰 손상을 주지 않는다고 생각된다.

This experiment was performed to evaluate the ultrastructural responses of the absorptive cells in the appendix of the mouse, inoculated with Ehrlich carcinoma cells in the inguinal area, following administration of BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guerin). Healthy adult ICR mice weighing 25 gm each were divided into normal and experimental groups (experimental control group and BCG treated group). In the experimental groups, each mouse was inoculated with $1{\time}10^7$ Ehrlich carcinoma cells subcutaneously in the inguinal area. From next day after inoculations, 0.5mL of saline or BCG (0.5 mL/25gm B.W.: $0.03{\times}10^8{\sim}0.32{\times}10^8CFU$) were injected subcutaneously to the animals every other day. The day following the last injection, each mouse was sacrificed. Pieces of the tissue were taken from the appendix, prefixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde-1.5% paraformaldehyde solution, followed by post-fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide solution. The ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. In the normal control, experimental control and BCG treated mice, general morphology of the absorptive cells of appendix were similar. But myelin figures and intramitochondrial dense granules were more frequently observed in the absorptive cells of BCG treated mice than normal control ones. Above results show that BCG did show slight ultrastructural alterations in the absorptive cell of the appendix. These results that BCG may slightly suppress function of the absorptive cells of the appendix.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn BJ, Ahn ET, Park KH, Kim JK, Ko JS: Effects of Adriamycin or AG60 to the DNA synthesis of duodenal epithelium of mice implanted with Ehrlich Carcinoma cells: Autoradiographic study. Korean J Phys Anthrop 15 (4) : 279-291, 2002. (Korean) https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2002.15.4.279
  2. Ahn ET, Ko JS, Kim HJ, Kim SG, Lee KY, Kang JK, Yoo BI, Chung YS, Hong EK, Han YB: Effects of AG60 (Acriflavine- Guanosine compound) on the Ehrlich cancer cells- Light microscopic, Autoradiographic and Electron microscopic study. The Korean J Anat 32(2) : 117-134, 1999. (Korean)
  3. Barbeito CG, Albarenque SM, Reyna JC, Flamini MA, Laube PF, Badran AF: Mitotic activity of the duodenal crypt enterocytes in mice transplanted with EA21a mammary carcinoma. Cell Biol Int 26 (1) : 123-125, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.2001.0824
  4. Bartlett GL, Zbar B and Rapp HJ: Suppression of murine tumor growth by immune reaction to the Bacillus Calmette- Guern strain of Mycobactrium bovis, J Natl Cancer Inst 48 : 245-257, 1972
  5. Cameron IL: Cell proliferation and renewal in the mammalian body. In: Cellular and molecular renewal in the mammalian body, eds Cameron IL, Thrasher JD. New York, Academic Press, pp. 45-79, 1971
  6. Chirigos MA: Immunomodulators: Current and future development and application. Thymus 19 (suppl 1) : S7-S20, 1992
  7. Clark WG, Brater CD, Johnson AR: Goth's Medical Pharmacology, 13th ed. St. Louis, Mosby Year Book, pp. 704-714, 1992
  8. Clark MA, Jepson MA, Hirst BH: Lectin binding defines and differentiates M-cells in mouse small intestine and caecum. Histochem Cell Biol 104(2) : 161-168, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01451575
  9. Clark MA, Jepson MA, Simmons NL. Hirst BH: Differential surface characteristics of M cells from mouse intestinal Peyer's and caecal patches. Histochem J 26(3) : 271-280, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02388442
  10. DeHaven JI, Traynellis C, Rigg DR, Ting E, Lamm DL: Antibiotic and steroid therapy of massive systemic Bacillus Calmette-Guerin toxicity. J Urol 147 : 738-742. 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37369-X
  11. el-Demiry MIM, Smith G, Ritchie AWS, James K, Cumming JA, Hargreave TB , Chisholm GD: Local immune responses after intravesical BCG treatment for carcinoma in situ. Brit J Urol 60 : 543-548, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1987.tb05039.x
  12. Farkas SA, Hornung M, Sattler C, Steinbauer M, Anthuber M, Obermeier F, Herfarth H, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK: Preferential migration of CD62L cells into the appendix in mice with experimental chronic colitis. Eur Surg Res 37(2) : 115-122, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1159/000084543
  13. Foster HL, Small JD, Fox JG: The mouse in biomedical research. Vol. III. Normative biology, immunology, and husbandry. Academic press, pp. 113-114 1983
  14. Ghadially FN: Ultrastuctural pathology of the cell and matrix. 3rd ed, London, Butterworths, pp. 238-244, 646-659, 1997
  15. Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Molinoff PB, Ruddon RW, Gilman AG: Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 9th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, pp. 1225-1232, 1264-1265, 1996
  16. Hedrich HJ, Bullock G: The laboratory mouse. Chapter 9. Normative histology of organs. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp. 142-144, 245-249, 2004
  17. Jin C, Nagata T: Light microscopic autoradiographic study of DNA synthesis in cecal epithelial cells of aging mice. J Histochem Cytochem 43 (12 : 1223-1228, 1993
  18. Jung WH, Ahn ET, Park KH, Park DK, Kim MS, Ko JS: Effects of BCG or CP-2 on the DNA synthesis in the epithelial cells of the mouse appendix. The Korean J Anat 39 (5) : 343-351, 2006. (Korean)
  19. Klimpel GK, Henney CS: BCG-induced suppressor cells I. Demonstration of a macrophage-like suppressor cell that inhibits cytotoxic T cell genetation in vitro. J Immunol 120 : 563-569, 1978
  20. Ko JS, Ahn ET, Park KH, Park DK, Jung EJ: Effects of 5- fluorouracil, Mitomycin C or AG60 to the DNA synthesis of rectal epithelium of mice implanted with Ehrlich Carcinoma cells. Korean J Phys Anthrop 18 (3) : 217-229, 2005. (Korean) https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2005.18.3.217
  21. Kobayashi H, Watanabe T, Nakahara A, Mutoh H, Tanaka N, Uchiyama Y: Fine structure and morphometric studies on gastric parietal cells of peptic ulcer patients after long-term treatment with omeprazole. Arch Histol Cytol 61 (4) : 287-295, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc.61.287
  22. Krieglstein CF, Cerwinka WH, Laroux FS, Grisham MB, Schurmann G, Bruwer M, Granger DN: Role of appendix and spleen in experimental colitis. J Surg Res 101 (2) : 166-175, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2001.6223
  23. Lamm DL: BCG in perspective: Advances in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 27(suppl 2) : 2-8, 1995
  24. Lamm DL, Riggs DR, DeHaven JI: Enhanced natural killer( NK) cell activity with BCG and vitamin treatment (abstract 991). J Urol 151 : 475A, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34996-0
  25. Martins MJ, Hipolito-Reis C, Azevedo I: Effect of fasting on rat duodenal and jejunal microvilli. Clin Nutr 20 (4) : 325-331, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1054/clnu.2001.0459
  26. Mathe G, Halle-Pannenko O, Bourut C: Immune manipulation by BCG administered before or after cyclophosphamide for chemo-immunotherapy of L1210 leukemia. Eur J Cancer 10 : 661-670, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2964(74)90005-X
  27. Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Chiba C, Bhan AK: Role of appendix in the development of inflammatory bowel disease in TCR-alpha mutant mice. J Exp Med 184 (2) : 707-715, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.184.2.707
  28. Parkhomenko IuG, Ali-Riza AE, Barkhina TG: The morphological characteristics of the cecum and its lymphoid tissue in BALB/C mice. Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol 100 (3); 50-55, 1991
  29. Popiela T, Zembala M, Kulig J, Czupryna A, Uracz W: Postoperative immunochemotherapy (BCG+5-FU) in advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 8 : 1423-1428, 1988
  30. Ratliff TL, Gillen D and Catalona WJ: Requirement of a thymus dependent immune response for BCG-mediated antitumor activity. J Urol 137 : 155-158, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)43909-7
  31. Rubio CA, Sveander M, Tornling G, Uribe A: DNA synthesis in the gastroduodenal mucosa during acute and chronic stress in the rat. In Vivo 2(2) : 143-146, 1988
  32. Varedi M, Greeley GH Jr, Herdon DN, Englander EW: A thermal injury-induced circulating factor (s) compromises intestinal cell morphology, proliferation, and migration. Am J Physiol 277 (1 pt 1) : G175-182. 1999
  33. Zembala M, Czupryna A, Wieckiewicz J, Jasinski M, Pryjma J, Ruggiero I, Siedlar M, Popiela T: Tumour-cell-induced production of tumour necrosis factor by monocytes of gastric cancer patient receiving BCG immunotherapy. Cancer Immuol Immunother 36 : 127-132, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01754413