DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study of Outcomes between Shunting after Cranioplasty and in Cranioplasty after Shunting in Large Concave Flaccid Cranial Defect with Hydrocephalus

  • Oh, Chang-Hyun (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Inha University) ;
  • Park, Chong-Oon (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Inha University) ;
  • Hyun, Dong-Keun (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Inha University) ;
  • Park, Hyung-Chun (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Inha University) ;
  • Yoon, Seung-Hwan (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Inha University)
  • Published : 2008.10.28

Abstract

Objective : The cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt operation have been used to treat a large cranial defect with posttraumatic hydrocephalus (PTH). The aim of this study was to evlauate the difference of outcomes between in the shunting after the cranioplasty (group 1) and the cranioplasty after the shunting (group 2) in a large flaccid cranial defect with PTH. Methods : In this study, a retrospective review was done on 23 patients undergoing the cranioplasty and VP shunt operation after the decompressive craniectomy for a refractory intracranial hypertension from 2002 to 2005. All of 23 cases had a large flaccid concave cranial defect and PTH. Ten cases belong to group 1 and 13 cases to group 2. The outcomes after operations were compared in two groups 6 months later. Results : The improvement of Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was seen in 8 cases (80.0%) of total 10 cases in group 1, and 6 cases (46.2%) of 13 cases in group 2. Three (75.0%) of 4 cases with hemiparesis in group 1 and 3 of 6 cases (50.0%) in group 2 were improved. All cases (2 cases) with decrease of visual acuity were improved in each group. Dysphasia was improved in 3 of 5 cases (60%) in group 1 and 4 of 6 cases (66.6%) in group 2. Conclusion : These results suggest that outcomes in group 1 may be better than in group 2 for a large flaccid concave cranial defect with PTH.

Keywords

References

  1. Aggett PJ, Harvey DR, Till K : Intracerebral haematoma with communicating hydrocephalus in a neonate. Proc R Soc Med 69 : 877-879, 1976
  2. Ahn ST, Yoo DS, Cho KS, Kim JK, Huh PW, Kim DS, et al : The use of the programmable valve shunt system in the management of patients with hydrocephalus. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 31 : 139-144, 2002
  3. Alperin N, Vikingstad EM, Gomez-Anson B, Levin DN : Hemodynamically independent analysis of the CSF and brain motion observed with dynamic phase contrast MRI. Mag Res Med 35 : 741-754, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910350516
  4. Asada M, Tamaki N, Kanazawa Y, Matsumoto S, Matsuo M, Kimura S, et al : Computer analysis of periventricular lucency on the CT scan. Neuroradiology 16 : 207-211, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395251
  5. Beyerl B, Black PM : Posttraumatic Hydrocephalus. Neurosurg 15 : 257-261, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198408000-00020
  6. Dandy WE, Blackfan KD : Internal hydrocephalus: An experimental, clinical and pathological study. Am J Dis Child 8 : 406-482, 1914
  7. Dujovny M, Agner C, Aviles A : Syndrome of the trephined : theory and facts. Crit Rev Neurosurg 9 : 271-278, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003290050143
  8. Dujovny M, Aviles A, Agner C, Fernandez P, Charbel FT : Cranioplasty : cosmetic or therapeutic? Surg Neurol 47 : 238-241, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(96)00013-4
  9. Ekstedt J : CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40 : 105-119, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.40.2.105
  10. Fodstad H, Ekstedt J, Friden H : CSF hymodynamic studies before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 28 : 514-518, 1979
  11. Fodstad H, Love JA, Ekstedt J, Friden H, Liliequist B : Effect of cranioplasty on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients wit the syndrome of the trephined. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 70 : 21-30, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406039
  12. Gardner WJ : Closure of defects of the skull with titanium. Surg Gynecol Obstet 80 : 326-328, 1945
  13. Grant FC, Norcross NS : Repair of cranial defects by cranioplasty. Ann Surg 110 : 488-512, 1939 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-193910000-00002
  14. Jennett B, Bone M : Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1 : 480-484, 1975
  15. Kishore PR, Lipper MH, Miller JD, Girevendulis AK, Becker DP, Vines FS : Post-traumatic hydrocephalus in patients with severe head injury. Neuroradiology 16 : 261-265, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395266
  16. Langfitt TW : Increased intracranial pressure. Clin Neurosurg 16 : 436-471, 1968
  17. Liang W, Xiaofeng Y, Weiguo L, Gang S, Xuesheng Z, Fei C, et al. : Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head injury. J Craniofac Surg 18 : 526-532, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3180534348
  18. Park CO, Chae KB, Lee SD, Kim Y, Ha YS : The study on frontal ventricular measurement and correlation between cerebroventricular index and cephalic index on normal computed tomography. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 19 : 608-614, 1990
  19. Pedersen KK, Haase J : Isotope liquorgraphy in the demonstration of communicating obstructive hydrocephalus after severe cranial trauma. Acta Neurol Scand 49 : 10-30, 1973
  20. Portnoy HD, Chopp M, Branch C, Shannon MB : Cerebrospinal fluid pulse waveform as an indicator of cerebral regulation. J Neurosurg 56 : 666-678, 1982 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1982.56.5.0666
  21. Rish BL, Meacham WF : Elementary study of the intraventricular installation of radioactive gold. J Neurosurg 27 : 15-20, 1967 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1967.27.1.0015
  22. Schaller B, Graf R, Sanada Y, Rosner G, Wienhard K, Heiss WD : Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of decompressive hemicraniectomy in normal brain. An experimental PET-study in cats. Brain Res 982 : 31-37, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02900-7
  23. Segal DH, Oppenheim JS, Murovic JA : Neurological recovery after cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 34 : 729-731; discussion 731, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199404000-00024
  24. Seo WD, Kim YD, Hong DY, Kim DH, Choi GH, Yeo HT : Neurological improvement after cranioplasty in patients with surgical bony defect : The usefulness of acetazolamide activated 99m Tc- HMPAO Spect. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 40 : 434-440, 2006
  25. Shapiro K, Fried A, Takei F, Kohn I : Effect of the skull and dura on neural axis pressure-volume relationships and CSF hydrodynamics. J Neurosurg 63 : 76-81, 1985 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.1.0076
  26. Stein SC, Langfitt TW : Normal pressure hydrocephalus : predicting the results of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurosurg 41 : 463-470, 1974 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1974.41.4.0463
  27. Stula D : The problem of the "sinking skin flap syndrome"in cranioplasty. J Maxillofac Surg 10 : 142-145, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(82)80030-1
  28. Stula D : [Intracranial pressure measurement in large skull defects.] Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 28 : 164-169, 1985
  29. Teasdale G, Jennett B : Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 2 : 81-84, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)93219-8
  30. Yamaura A, Makino H : Neurological deficits in the presence of the sinking flap following decompressive craniectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 17 : 43-53, 1977
  31. Yoshida K. Furuse M, Izawa A, Iizima N, Kuchiwaki H : Dynamics of cerebral blood flow and metabolism in patients with cranioplasty as evaluated by xenon,133, CT and P31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 61 : 166-171, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.61.2.166
  32. Youman's Neurological surgery. History and physical Examination, ed 5. New York : SAUNDERS, 2008, Vol1, pp 267

Cited by

  1. Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases vol.26, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.3.focus0962
  2. Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty vol.56, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.5.410
  3. Paradoxical herniation after decompressive craniectomy provoked by lumbar puncture or ventriculoperitoneal shunting vol.123, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.jns141810
  4. An Improved One-Stage Operation of Cranioplasty and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Patient with Hydrocephalus and Large Cranial Defect vol.11, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.93
  5. Early Decompression of Acute Subdural Hematoma for Postoperative Neurological Improvement: A Single Center Retrospective Review of 10 Years vol.12, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2016.12.1.11
  6. Early Cranioplasty Improved Rehabilitation in Patients With Traumatic Skull Injuries vol.26, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1097/wnq.0000000000000133
  7. Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical trial vol.126, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.10.jns151245
  8. Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical trial vol.126, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.10.jns151245
  9. The Conundrum of Ventricular Dilatations Following Decompressive Craniectomy: Is Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt, The Only Panacea? vol.9, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_395_17
  10. Importance of Calvaria in Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics: A Case of Ventriculomegaly and Sinking Flap Syndrome after Decompressive Craniectomy vol.13, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.175631
  11. Acute Subdural Hematoma Evacuation: Predictive Factors of Outcome vol.13, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.ajns_51_16
  12. Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy vol.10, pp.None, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01357