Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Key Sucess factors Analysis Based on the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award

Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award의 평가모델에 근거한 핵심성공요인분석

  • Jung, Kyung-Hee (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, KyungHee University) ;
  • Cho, In-Hee (Dept. of Industrial & Management Engineering, NamSeoul University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Je (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, KyungHee University) ;
  • Cho, Jai-Rip (College of Advanced Technology, KyungHee University)
  • 정경희 (경희대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 조인희 (남서울대학교 산업경영학과) ;
  • 김성제 (경희대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 조재립 (경희대학교 테크노공학대학)
  • Published : 2008.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

At the spots of enterprises experiencing rapid environmental changes, necessity for ceaseless managemental innovation is raised. We can't deny that management quality is also a part of such managemental innovation. Introduction of management quality by an organization is different from introduction of other individual innovative techniques. Management quality is not one time project but complete historical change program to be pursued continuously. Furthermore, it must be understood as a strategic 'Quality Journey' looking for far future of an organization. Malcolm Baldrige Model has been increasingly used in Korea as a global standard for management quality. The model, however, has shown a number of limitations in application due to nonsystematic elements in the implementation process. The deployment process of the model should be detailed through a real world case study. In this research, we proposed a quality evaluation standard model which is suitable for the Korean public enterprise based on the Malcolm Baldrige Non-profit Criteria, and examined the model. A 7-Point Likert Scale was used based on the seven categories within the 2007 Malcolm Baldrige Non-profit Criteria: Leadership, Strategic Planning, Customer and Market Focus, Management Analysis and Knowledge Management, Workforce Focus, Process Management, and Results. Furthermore, we analysed the validity and causal relationship among the factors within the model. Through the above case study, following common factors for successful Malcolm Baldrige Model have been derived. The following is a summary of the results of this study. First, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs powerful support Leadership. Second, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Strategic Planning. Third, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs the continuous Customer and Market Focus. Fourth, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Measurement Analysis and Knowledge Management. Five, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Workforce Focus. Six, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Process Management. The finding are surely necessary factors to arrange the human resource management for upgraded management quality, those factors help to explain why all enterprises consider human resource as the strategic view.

Keywords

References

  1. 김계수(2007). 서비스 조직에서의 프로세스품질에 대한 이해와 6시그마 모형개발: 구조방정식 모형분석 이용, 품질경영학회지, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 84-99
  2. 김연성, 박상찬, 박영택, 서영호, 유한주, 이동규(2005), 품질경영론, 3판, 박영사
  3. 김정현(2007), 말콤볼드리지 모델을 활용한 경영혁신 사례연구, 석사학위논문, 성균관대학교 일반대학원
  4. 나승균(2005), 말콤볼드리지 모델을 이용한 경영품질 핵심요인에 관한 연구, 석사학위논문, 성균관대학교 일반대학원
  5. 노형진(2006), SPSS에 의한 조사방법 및 통계분석, 형설출판사
  6. 노형진(2007), SPSS/Amos에 의한 사회조사분석, 형설출판사
  7. 삼성경제연구소(2005), 서비스 이노베이션 엔지 6시그마
  8. 서울 Q&I 포럼, 경영품질의 세계기준 말콤볼드리지, 한국언론자료간행회, 2001
  9. 전정호(2007), 고객 중시 전략이 고객성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 연구 : 말콤볼드리지 국가 품질상(MBNQA) 수상 사례를 중심으로, 석사학위논문, 경희대학교 경영대학원
  10. 한국표준협회(2005), ks-SQI REPORT
  11. Badri, M. A., Selim, H., Alshare, K., Grandon, E. E., Younis, H. and Abdulla, M. (2006), The Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence Framework Empirical test and validation, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 1118-1157 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710610704249
  12. Barclay, C. A. (1993), Quality strategy and TQM policies: empirical evidence, Management International Review, Vol. 33, pp. 87-98
  13. Calantone, R. J and Zhao, Y. S. (2000), Joint Ventures in China: A Comparative Study of japanese, Korean, and U. S. Partners, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-23
  14. Evans, J. R. (1997), Critical linkages in the Baldrige award criteria: research models and educational challenges, Quality Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 13-30 https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1997.11918830
  15. Fornell, C. (1996), The American Customer Satisfaction Index: nature, purpose, and findings, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, October, pp. 7-18 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251898
  16. Ghobadian, A. and Woo, H. S. (1994), Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 10-44
  17. Handfield, R. (2000), Validation the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award Frame work through structural equation modeling, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 765-791
  18. Lascelles, D. M. and Dale, B. G. (1989), A review of the issues involved in quality improvement, Internation Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 5, pp. 76-94
  19. Meyer, S. M. and Schweikhart, S. B. (2002), Empirical support for the Baldrige Award Framework in US hospitals, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 62-75 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004010-200201000-00006
  20. N. J. Decarlo and W. K. Sterette. (1990), History of the Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award, Quality Progress, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 21-27
  21. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2006), 2006 Criteria for Performance Excellence
  22. Samson, D. and Terziovski, M. (1999), The Relationship between Total Quality Management Practices and Operational Performance, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 393-409 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00046-1
  23. Wilson, D. D. and Collier, D. A. (2000), An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Casual Model, Decision Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 361-390 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb01627.x