Fresh Fibroblast Allograft as a Treatment for Diabetic Foot Ulcers

당뇨족 궤양의 치료를 위한 신선 섬유아세포 동종이식

  • Shim, Jae Sun (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Seung-Kyu (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Woo Kyung (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 심재선 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 한승규 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김우경 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2008.04.10
  • Accepted : 2008.07.18
  • Published : 2008.10.15

Abstract

Purpose: In order to overcome the limitations of the conventional cryopreserved fibroblast or keratinocyte allograft method used in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, we reported a pilot study in 2004 demonstrating promising results of a fresh fibroblast allograft method in eight patients. However, the number of cases was insufficient for full evaluation and the follow-up duration was not long enough to determine the efficacy and safety of the method. This encouraged us to conduct this follow-up study to fully evaluate the use of noncryopreserved fresh human fibroblast allografts in treating diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with diabetic foot ulcers were treated using fresh fibroblast allografts. Human dermal fibroblasts from healthy teenagers were cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 10% serum. The cultured cells were applied on the wounds immediately following debridement, with fibrin being used as a cell carrier. In eight weeks, percentages of complete healing, mean healing time, and patient satisfactions were assessed, with follow-up time ranging from 6 to 40 months. Results: Our study showed that 83.8% of the treated patients were complete healed. The time required for complete healing was $30.9{\pm}10.1$ days. Patient satisfaction scores for the experimental treatment were higher than those for the conventional method(mean scores of $8.1{\pm}1.1$ and $4.8{\pm}1.4$, respectively). No adverse events related to the study treatment occurred. Conclusion: The use of fresh human fibroblast allografts was found to be a safe and effective treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.

Keywords

References

  1. Mansbridge JN, Liu K, Pinney RE, Patch R, Ratcliffe A, Naughton GK: Growth factors secreted by fibroblasts: role inhealingdiabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Obes Metab 1: 265, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1326.1999.00032.x
  2. Lerman OZ, Galiano RD, Armour M, Levine JP, Gurtner GC: Cellular Dysfunction in the Diabetic Fibroblast: impairment in migration, vascular endothelial growth factor production, and response to hypoxia. Am J Pathol 162: 303, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63821-7
  3. Hehenberger K, Heilborn JD, Brismar K, Hansson A: Inhibited proliferation of fibroblasts derived from chronic diabetic wounds and normal dermal fibroblasts treated with high glucose is associated with increased formation of l-lactate. Wound Repair Regen 6: 135, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.1998.60207.x
  4. De Loecker W, Koptelov VA, Grischenko VI, De Loecker P: Effects of cell concentration on viability and metabolic activity during cryopreservation. Cryobiology 37: 103, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1998.2106
  5. Kano M, Masuda Y, Tominaga T, Hori T, Kitaichi T, Yoshizumi M, Kitagawa T: Collagen synthesis and collagenase activity of cryopreserved heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122: 706, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.115421
  6. Liu K, Yang Y, Mansbridge J: Comparison of the stress response to cryopreservation in monolayer and three-dimensional human fibroblast cultures: stress proteins, MAP kinases, and growth factor gene expression. Tissue Eng 6: 539, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1089/107632700750022189
  7. Han SK, Choi KJ, Kim WK: Clinical application of fresh fibroblast allografts for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg 114: 1783, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000142415.57470.DF
  8. Veves A, Falanga V, Armstrong DG, Sabolinski ML: Graftskin, a human skin equivalent, is effective in the management of noninfected neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 24: 290, 2001 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.2.290
  9. Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, Pollak R: The efficacy and safety of dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care 26: 1701, 2003 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.6.1701
  10. Smiell JM, Wieman TJ, Steed DL, Perry BH, Sampson AR, Schwab BH: Efficacy and safety of becaplermin (recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor- BB) in patients with nonhealing, lower extremity diabetic ulcers: a combined analysis of four randomized studies. Wound Repair Regen 7: 335, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00335.x
  11. Sams HH, Chen J, King LE: Graftskin treatment of difficult to heal diabetic foot ulcers: one center's experience. Dermatol Surg 28: 698, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02019.x
  12. Pham HT, Rosenblum BL, Lyons TE, Giurini JM, Chrzan JS, Habershaw GM, Veves A: Evaluation of a human skin equivalent for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Wounds 11: 79, 1999
  13. Mansbridge JN, Liu K, Pinney RE, Patch R, Ratcliffe A, Naughton GK: Growth factors secreted by fibroblasts: role in healing diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Obes Metab 1: 265, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1326.1999.00032.x