Applied Chemistry for Engineering (공업화학)

The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (한국공업화학회)
권호 표지

Preparation and Oxygen Permeation Properties of La0.07Sr0.3Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ Membrane

La0.07Sr0.3Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ 분리막의 제조 및 산소투과 특성

  • Park, Jung Hoon (Korea Institute of Energy Research, Green House Gas Research Center) ;
  • Kim, Jong Pyo (Korea Institute of Energy Research, Green House Gas Research Center) ;
  • Baek, Il Hyun (Korea Institute of Energy Research, Green House Gas Research Center)
  • 박정훈 (한국에너지기술연구원 온실가스연구센터) ;
  • 김종표 (한국에너지기술연구원 온실가스연구센터) ;
  • 백일현 (한국에너지기술연구원 온실가스연구센터)
  • Received : 2008.03.22
  • Accepted : 2008.09.01
  • Published : 2008.10.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

$La_{0.7}Sr_{0.3}Co_{0.2}Fe_{0.8}O_{3-{\delta}$ oxide was synthesized by a citrate method and a typical dense membrane of perovskite oxide has been prepared using as-prepared powder by pressing and sintering at $1300^{\circ}C$. Precursor of $La_{0.7}Sr_{0.3}Co_{0.2}Fe_{0.8}O_{3-{\delta}$ prepared by citrate method was investigated by TGA and XRD. Metal-citrate complex in precursor was decomposed into perovskite oxide in the temperature range of $260{\sim}410^{\circ}C$ but XRD results showed $SrCO_3$ existed as impurity at less than $900^{\circ}C$. Electrical conductivity of membrane increased with increasing temperature but then decreased over $700^{\circ}C$ in air atmosphere ($Po_2=0.2atm$) and $600^{\circ}C$ in He atmosphere ($Po_2=0.01atm$) respectively due to oxygen loss from the crystal lattice. The oxygen permeation flux increased with increasing temperature and maximum oxygen permeation flux of $La_{0.7}Sr_{0.3}Co_{0.2}Fe_{0.8}O_{3-{\delta}$ membrane with 1.6 mm thickness was about $0.31cm^3/cm^2{\cdot}min$ at $950^{\circ}C$. The activation energy for oxygen permeation was 88.4 kJ/mol in the temperature range of $750{\sim}950^{\circ}C$. Perovskite structure of membrane was not changed after permeation test of 40 h and the membrane was stable without secondary phase change with 0.3 mol Sr addition.

구연산법을 이용하여 $La_{0.7}Sr_{0.3}Co_{0.2}Fe_{0.8}O_{3-{\delta}$ 산화물을 합성하였으며, 합성된 분말은 압축 성형 후 $1300^{\circ}C$에서 소결하여 치밀한 페롭스카이트 분리막을 제조하였다. 구연산법으로 제조한 $La_{0.7}Sr_{0.3}Co_{0.2}Fe_{0.8}O_{3-{\delta}$의 전구물질은 TGA와 XRD로 분석하였다. $260{\sim}410^{\circ}C$ 온도 영역에서 전구물질의 금속-구연산 복합체가 분해되며 페롭스카이트 산화물이 얻어지나 XRD 분석결과 $900^{\circ}C$ 이하에서는 $SrCO_3$가 불순물로 존재하였다. 분리막의 전기전도도는 온도가 증가함에 따라 증가하다. 결정격자의 산소 손실로 인해 공기분위기에서는 $700^{\circ}C$ ($Po_2=0.2atm$)부터, 헬륨분위기에서는 $600^{\circ}C$ ($Po_2=0.01atm$) 부터 각각 감소하였다. 산소투과량은 온도가 증가할수록 증가하였고, 두께 1.6 mm의 $La_{0.7}Sr_{0.3}Co_{0.2}Fe_{0.8}O_{3-{\delta}$ 분리막은 $950^{\circ}C$에서 $0.31cm^3/cm^2{\cdot}min$의 최대 투과도를 보였다. 산소투과에 대한 활성화 에너지는 $750{\sim}950^{\circ}C$ 온도 영역에서 88.4 kJ/mol이었다. 40 h의 투과실험 후에 분리막의 페롭스카이트 결정 구조는 변하지 않았으며 0.3 mol Sr doping 시 2차상이 생성되지 않고 안정하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 과학기술부

References

  1. K. Thambimuthu, M. Soltanieh, and J. C. Abanades, IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage, ed. O. Davidson, B. Metz, 1, 6, Cambridge University Press London (2005)
  2. A. J. Burggraaf and J. H, M. Bouwmeester, Fundamentals of Inorganic Membrane Science and Technology, ed. A. J. Burggraaf and L. Cot, 4, 435, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)
  3. J. H. Park and S. D. Park, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24, 897 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-007-0062-2
  4. C.-F. Kao and W.-D. Yang, Appl. Organometal. Chem., 13, 383 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0739(199905)13:5<383::AID-AOC836>3.0.CO;2-P
  5. S. Kim, Y. L. Yang, R. Christoffersen, and A. J. Jacobson, Solid State Ionics, 104, 57 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00427-X
  6. J. H. Park, J. P. Kim, H. T. Kwon, and K. J. Soo, Desalination, 233, 73 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.045
  7. K. R. Patent 10-2007-0130276 (2007)
  8. S. Li, W. Jin, P. Huang, N. Xu, J. Shi, Y. S. Lin, M. Z. C. Hu, and E. A. Payzant, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, 2963 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9900014
  9. Y. Teraoka, T. Nobunaga and N. Yamazoe, Chem. Lett., 503 (1988)
  10. C. Y. Tsai, A. G. Dixon, Y. H. Ma, W. R. Moser, and M. R. Pascucci, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81, 1437 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02501.x
  11. J. W. Stevenson, T. R. Armstrong, R. D. Carneim, L. R. Pederson, and W. J. Weber, J. Electrochem. Soc., 143, 2722 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837098
  12. X. Qi, Y. S. Lin, and S. L. Swartz, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39, 646 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie990675e