수질에 대한 대기건식침적의 영향 - 건식침적량 추정 방법론의 비교를 중심으로

Effect of Dry Deposition on Water Quality -The comparison of several methodologies for estimating dry deposition flux

  • 정장표 (경성대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • 투고 : 2008.01.03
  • 심사 : 2008.02.13
  • 발행 : 2008.02.15

초록

A special field experiment has been carried out from March 2001 to June 2001 at the Changhowon in Kyunggi to investigate a better methodology for the estimation of dry deposition of pollutions applicable in Korea. In this study, dry deposition plate was used to measure of total and water soluble acidic mass fluxes, and CPRI(Coarse Particle Rotary Impactor), CI(Cascade Impactor) were also used to measure ambient concentrations in various particle size ranges. Sehmel-Hodgson model was used to estimate dry depostion velocity and Weibull probability distribution function was applied to get generalized particle size distribution for the size fractioned concentration data sampled by CPRI and CI. Atmospheric dry deposition fluxes of mass and ionic matters estimated by the various techniques(one-step, multi-step, equi-concentration, subdivision for only the coarse particle range, applying Weibull distribution function, etc.) were compared to flux data sampled by DDP. It was found out that the deposition fluxes estimation methodology calculated by the each particle size range devided by particle size distribution characteristics and the rapidly changed points of deposition velocity using Weibull probability distribution function was the most applicable.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 경성대학교

참고문헌

  1. 국립환경연구원 (2001) 건성 강하물 측정 방법 개선 연구, 83 - 151
  2. 국립환경과학원 (2005) 대기침적이 수질에 미치는 영향 연구 지침서 (I)
  3. 국립환경과학원 (2006) 대기침적이 수질에 미치는 영향 연구 지침서 (II)
  4. 이은영, (1998) 서울시 입자상 물질의 건식침적량 특성에 관한 연구, 이화여자대학교, 석사학위 논문
  5. 장남익 (2000) 수변지역의 대기건성침적 특성 및 평가방법 개발, 동신대학교, 박사학위논문
  6. 장영환 (2004) 상수원에 대한 대기침적의 영향과 잠재적 오염원의 규명, 경성대학교 박사학위논문
  7. 정장표, 장영환, 이승묵 ,전의찬, 신상철, 장남익, (2000) 주암호 지역의 대기건식침적 특성에 관한 연구, 한국대기환경학회 2000 춘계학술대회 논문집. pp. 97-99
  8. Cheong, J. P., Shin, H. M., Kim, S. H., Lee, S. K., (1996) The Impact of Dry Deposition on the Environment of Hoidong Reservoir, Environ. Eng. Res., 1(2), pp. 89-98
  9. Cliff I. Davison, Steven E. Lindberg, and Jill A. Schmidt, (1985) Dry Deposition of Sulfate onto Surrogate Surfaces, American Geophysical Union, pp. 2123-2130
  10. Holsen T. M. and Noll K. E., (1992) Dry Deposition of Atmospheric Particles : Application of Current Models to Ambient Data, Environmental Science & Technology, 26, pp 1807-1815 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00033a015
  11. Nicholson, K. W., (1988) The Dry Deposition of Small Particles : A Review of Experimental Measurements, Atmos. Environ., 22, pp. 2653-2666 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(88)90434-9
  12. Sehmel, G.A. and Hodgson, W.H. (1978). A model for predicting dry deposition of particles and gases to environmental surfaces. DOE report PNL-SA- 6721, Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, W.A
  13. Sehmel, G. A., (1984) Particle and Gas Dry Deposition : A Review, Atmos. Environ., 14, pp. 983-1011
  14. USEPA., (1991) Report of the Great Lakes Air Toxics Research Priorities Workshop, Office of modeling, Monitoring Systems and Quality Research, Research Triangle Park, NC
  15. USEPA (2001), Air-Water Interface Work Plan
  16. USEPA (1994) First Report to Congress on Deposition of Air Pollutants to the Great Waters, EPA-453/R-93-055
  17. USEPA (2000) Deposition of air pollutants to the Great Waters: Third report to congress, EPA- 453/R-93-055
  18. USEPA (1997) Second Report to Congress on Deposition of Air Pollutants to the Great Waters, EPA-453/R-93-055
  19. Yi, Seung-Muk and Cheong, Jang-Pyo (1997) Evaluation and Comparsion of Models for Predicting $SO_2$ Dry Deposition to the Measurement Using A Water Surface Sampler, Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 2(2)