Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture: A Case Report

임플랜트지지 피개의치를 이용한 무치악환자의 구강회복

  • Lee, Hong-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Ja-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Charn-Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 이홍석 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 송광엽 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 김자영 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 이정준 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 박주미 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 안승근 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 박찬운 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실)
  • Received : 2008.02.04
  • Accepted : 2008.03.25
  • Published : 2008.03.30

Abstract

Recently, osseointegrated implants have been used to improve denture support, stability, and retention. Several studies have been revealed that mandibular two-implant overdentures significantly increase patient satisfaction with the function of their prostheses. Use of a wide variety of attachment systems, including stud, magnet, and bar attachments, has proven both clinically predictable and effective. This article presents that two-implant overdenture can become the standard of care for treatment of the edentulous mandible.

최근에, 의치의 유지, 안정성, 지지를 개선시키기 위해 골유착 임플란트가 사용되고 있다. 여러 연구에서 하악에 두 개의 임플란트를 식립한 후 제작된 피개의치가 환자 보철에서 기능과 만족의 유의한 증가를 나타내고 있다. stud, magnet, 그리고 bar attachment를 포함하여 다양한 attachment 시스템을 사용해 임상적으로 예상 가능하고 효과적인 것이 증명되었다. 본 증례에서 2개의 임플란트를 이용한 피개의치가 무치하악의 치료를 위한 고려의 기본이 될 수 있다는 것을 나타낸다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kent G. Effects of osseointegrated implants on psychological and social well-being: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:515-518 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90421-6
  2. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: Satisfaction and Functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont
  3. Feine JS, Carlsson GE (eds). Implant overdentures: the standard of care for edentulous patients. Quintessence, 2003:78-80
  4. Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin RJ. Retention characteristics of attachment system for implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004;13:221- 226
  5. Schneider AL. A low-profile implant overdeture attachment: a case report. Contemp Esthet Rest Pract 2000
  6. Oetterli M, Kiener P, Mericske-Stern R. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:536-542
  7. Schneider AL, Kurtzman GM. restoration of divergent free-standing implants in the maxilla. J Oral implant 2002;28:113-116 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0113:RODFII>2.3.CO;2