Accuracy of Indirect Anthropometry on Cast Model of The Nose: Comparison with Direct Anthropometry

코 석고모형에서 간접인체계측법의 정확성 : 직접인체계측법과의 비교

  • Paik, Dae Hyang (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Ki Hwan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Won, Dong Chul (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Tae Hyun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jun Hyung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Dae Gu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine)
  • 백대향 (계명대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 한기환 (계명대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 원동철 (계명대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 최태현 (계명대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김준형 (계명대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 손대구 (계명대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2007.10.10
  • Published : 2008.01.10

Abstract

Purpose: We measured linear distances, angles and inclinations on the cast models of the noses, and compared these indirect measurements with the direct measurements obtained from the nose in order to validate the accuracy of the indirect anthropometry using the cast model. Methods: Subjects were 50 males and 50 females, medical students in twenties(mean 27.1 years). Cast models were made from the alginate impression material and the plaster. In direct anthropometry, 16 linear, 7 angular, and 2 inclination measurements between 11 landmarks on the nose were obtained using sliding caliper, spreading caliper, and fabric tape measure. At the same time, the same measurements were obtained from the cast models of the same people. Total 25 measurements were compared, and tested by the independent t-test of SPSS. Results: The standard values of Korean nose in twenties were obtained. 24 measurements except the columellar labial angle were not statistically different between the indirect anthropometry and the direct anthropometry. Conclusion: Indirect anthropometry on the cast model of the nose revealed no significant difference from the anthropometric measurement statistically, accounting for 24 in 25 measurements(96%). There are two possible reasons that caused the difference of columellar labial angle between direct and indirect anthropometry. First, the columellar labial angle could be decreased by protrusion of the lips which resulted from contracting mouth in which an drinking straw had been applied on the mouth corner for patients' respiration during making cast model. Second, it is generally known that the columellar labial angle could be measured larger when soft tissues were pressed by protractor in direct anthropometry. Using a drinking straw with greater diameter, and scheming respiration through the nostrils that patients don't feel discomfort, the more accurate data would be obtained from the indirect anthropometry using the cast models of the noses.

Keywords

References

  1. Posnick JC, Farkas LG: The application of anthropometric surface measurements in craniomaxillofacial surgery. In Farkas LG(ed): Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed, New York, Raven Press, 1994, p 125
  2. Han KH, Jeong HJ, Jin HS, Kim JH, Son DG: Indirect anthropometry on cast model of cleft lip nose: Comparison with direct anthropometry. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 34: 18, 2007
  3. Ratnaweera PM, Yoshida K, Miura H, Kohta A, Tsuchihira K: A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique. J Med Dent Sci 50: 231, 2003
  4. Appleby DC, Smith W, Lontz JF, Mingledorff EB: Combined reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems: comparative analysis. J Prosthet Dent 54: 627, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90236-7
  5. Linke BA, Nicholls JI, Faucher RR: Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 54: 794, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90473-1
  6. Kwon HJ, Han KH, Kim JH, Son DG: Photogrammetry based on standardized clinical photography using cephalostat: Comparison with anthropometric analysis. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 34: 24, 2007
  7. Farkas LG: Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed, New York, Raven Press, 1994, p 3
  8. Farkas LG: Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: past, present, and future. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33: 10, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0010:AOAMPP>2.3.CO;2
  9. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E: Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials. Scand J Dent Res 97: 375, 1989
  10. Kim KH, Chang IT, Yim SH: Accuracy of improved stone casts from elastomeric impression materials. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 37: 301, 1999
  11. Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP, Martin RA, Kane AA, Marazita ML: Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. J Craniofac Surg 17: 477, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200605000-00015
  12. Han K, Kang J: A custom-made nasal implant: prefabrication from curing of silicone adhesive. Plast Reconstr Surg 97: 436, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199602000-00026