DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Sucrose and Glycerol during the Freezing Step of Cryopreservation on the Viability of Goat Spermatozoa

  • Farshad, Abbas (Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan) ;
  • Akhondzadeh, S. (Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan)
  • Received : 2008.03.11
  • Accepted : 2008.06.08
  • Published : 2008.12.01

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to study the following: i) the influence of different concentrations of sucrose (0.15, 0.3 and 0.5 M with osmolality of 308, 500 and 760 mOsm/kg, respectively) in diluents and control diluent (370 mOsm/kg) on intensity of motility and progressive motility of goat sperm without rehydration and freezing step in four incubation periods (0, 0.5, 2 and 4 h after dilution); ii) the influence of gradual dilution (in 3 steps) on improvements in ascertained results of the first experiment; iii) cryoprotective effects of different concentrations of sucrose (0.15, 0.22, 0.29 and 0.37 M with osmolality of 450, 560, 740 and 920 mOsm/kg, respectively) plus 7% glycerol and 20% egg yolk in basic diluent (Tris-Citric acid-Fructose) and iv) the effect of two concentrations of sucrose (0.15 and 0.22 M) with and without glycerol (7%). In experiment 1, we obtained better results for control diluent, 0.15 and 0.3 M sucrose supplemented diluents with 0 and 0.5 h incubation periods. In experiment 2, apart from a slight improvement, similar tendencies to experiment 1 were observed. In experiment 3, we obtained the best result for diluent with 0.22 M sucrose with regard to intensity of motility, progressive motility, live sperm and normal acrosomes ($40{\pm}4%$, $3.1{\pm}0.2$, $37{\pm}4%$ and $37{\pm}4%$, repectively). In experiment 4, we obtained the best result for diluent with 0.22 M sucrose plus 7% glycerol in regard to intensity of motility, progressive motility and live sperm ($39{\pm}3%$, $3.6{\pm}0.4$ and $41{\pm}4%$, respectively). The characteristic normal acrosomes in diluents without glycerol, i.e. diluents with 0.15 and 0.22 M sucrose showed better results ($39{\pm}8$ and $42{\pm}6%$ respectively). With regard to the release of hyaluronidase enzyme there were no significant differences between diluents (p>0.05). The results of the diluents with 0.15 and 0.22 M sucrose without glycerol were slightly lower than those with glycerol ($69{\pm}11$ and $70{\pm}11$ vs. $72{\pm}11$ and $70{\pm}11{\times}120{\times}10^6$ units $ml^{-1}$, respectively). In conclusion, the use of concentrated sucrose solutions showed that goat sperm can tolerate osmolality up to 560 mOsm (0.22 M) in the freezing period. In addition, glycerol proved to be a necessary cryoprotective agent in the cryopreservation of goat sperm, particularly for intensity of motility, progressive motility and live sperm.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdelhakeam, A. A., E. F. Graham, I. A. Vazquez and K. M. Chaloner. 1991. Studies on the absence of glycerol in unfrozen and frozen ram semen: Development of an extender for freezing: Effects of osmotic pressure, egg yolk levels, type of sugars, and the method of dilution. Cryobiol. 28:43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(91)90006-A
  2. Aboagla, E. M. and T. Terada. 2003. Trehalose enhanced fluidity of the goat sperm membrane and its protection during freezing. Biol. Reprod. 69:1245-1250. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.017889
  3. Agca, Y., J. Gilmore, M. Byers, E. J. Woods, J. Liu and J. K. Critser. 2002. Osmotic characteristics of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of extenders and sugars. Biol. Reprod. 67:1493-1501. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.005579
  4. Aisen, E. G., V. H. Medina and A. Venturino. 2002. Cryopreservation and post thawed fertility of ram semen frozen in different trehalose concentrations. Theriogenol. 57:1801-1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00653-2
  5. Aslam, M., K. M. Ahmad, M. Ahmad and S. A. Gill. 1992. Additive effects of carbohydrates in Tris as bull semen extenders equilibrated for three or five hours. Pakistan Vet. J. 12:174-177.
  6. Belorkar, P. M., A. J. Dhami and S. B. kodagali. 1991. Physiological norms and correlation of seminal characters, biochemical constituents, freezablity and fertility in crossbred bulls. Indian Vet. Med. J. 15:191-197.
  7. Chauhan, M. S. and S. R. Anand. 1990. Effect of egg yolk lipids on the freezing of goat semen. Theriogenol. 34:1003-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90568-E
  8. Curry, M. R. and P. F. Watson. 1994. Osmotic effects on ram and human sperm membranes in relation to thawing injury. Cryobiol. 31:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1994.1005
  9. Curry, M. R., F. W. Kleinhans and P. F. Watson. 2000. Measurement of the water permeability of the membranes of boar, ram, and rabbit spermatozoa using concentrationdependent self-quenching of an entrapped fluorophore. Cryobiol. 41:167-173. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.2000.2277
  10. Deka, B. C. and A. R. Rao. 1986. Effect of glycerol level in Trisbased extender and equilibration period on quality of frozen goat semen. Theriogenol. 26:231-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(86)90027-0
  11. De Leeuw, F. E., A. M. De Leeuw, J. H. Den Daas, B. Colenbrander and A. J. Verkleij. 1993. Effects of various cryoprotective agents and membrane- stabilizing compounds on bull sperm membrane integrity after cooling and freezing. Cryobiol. 30:32-44. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1993.1005
  12. Dhami, A. J. and S. B. Kodagali. 1990. Freezability, enzyme leakage and fertility of buffalo spermatozoa in relation to the quality of semen ejaculates and extenders. Theriogenol. 34:835-863.
  13. Fernandez-Santos, M. R., F. Martinez-Pastor, V. Garcia-Macias, M. C. Esteso, A. J. Soler, P. de Paz, L. Anel and J. J. Garde. 2007. Extender osmolality and sugar supplementation exert a complex effect on the cryopreservation of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal spermatozoa. Theriogenol. 67:738-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.10.005
  14. Fiser, P. S. and G. A. Langford. 1980. Cryosurvival of ram sperm influenced by diluent osmolality. Fertil. Steril. 36:265-266.
  15. Fiser, P. S., L. Ainsworth and G. A. Langford. 1981. Effect of osmolality of skim diluents and thawing rate on cryopreservation of ram spermatozoa. Cryobiol. 18:399-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(81)90113-9
  16. Fiser, P. S., L. Ainsworth and R. W. Fairfull. 1982. Cryosurvival of ram spermatozoa in hypertonic and isotonic diluents. Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 62:425-428. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas82-049
  17. Fiser, P. S. and R. W. Fairfull. 1986. Combined effects of glycerol concentration, cooling, velocity, and osmolality of skim milk diluents on cropreservation of ram spermatozoa. Theriogenol. 25:473-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(86)90057-9
  18. Fiser, P. S. and R. W. Fairful. 1989. The effect of glycerol related osmotic changes on post thaw motility and acrosomal integrity of ram spermatozoa. Cryobiol. 26:64-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(89)90033-3
  19. Foulkes, J. A. and P. A. Watson. 1995. Hyaluronidase activity in seminal plasma as a method of assessing bull sperm integrity. J. Reprod. Fert. 43:349-353.
  20. Garcia, M. A. and E. F. Graham. 1989. Development of a buffer system for dialysis of bovine spermatozoa before freezing. II. Effects of sugars and sugar alcohols on post thaw motility. Theriogenol. 31:1029-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(89)90486-X
  21. Hammerstedt, R. H., J. K. Graham and J. P. Nolan. 1990. Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. J. Androl. 11:73-88.
  22. Hammerstedt, R. H. and J. K. Graham. 1992. Cryopreservation of poultry sperm: The enigma of glycerol. Cryobiol. 29:26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(92)90004-L
  23. Iguer-Ouada, M. and J. P. Verstegen. 2001. Long-term preservation of chilled canine semen: effect of commercial and laboratory prepared extenders. Theriogenol. 55:671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00435-6
  24. Joshi, A., A. K. Mathur, S. M. K. Naqvi and J. P. Mittal. 2006. Influence of osmolality of complete semen extender on motion characteristics of frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1716-1721. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1716
  25. Kundu, C. N., J. Chakraborty, P. Dutta, D. Bhattacharyya, A. Ghosh and G. C. Majumder. 2000. Development of a simple sperm cryopreservation model using a chemically defined medium and goat cauda epididymal spermatozoa. Cryobiol. 40:117-125. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.2000.2230
  26. Lapwood, K. R. and I. C. Martin. 1966. The use of monosaccharides, disaccharides, and trisaccharides in synthetic dilutents for the storage of ram spermatozoa at 37$^{\circ}$C and 5$^{\circ}$C. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 19:655-671. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9660655
  27. Liu, Z., R. H. Foote and C. C. Brockett. 1998. Survival of bull sperm frozen at different rates in media varying in osmolarity. Cryobiol. 37:219-230. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1998.2117
  28. McRorie, R. A. and W. L. Williams. 1974. Biochemistry of mammalian fertilization. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 43:777(Abstr.). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.43.070174.004021
  29. Molinia, F. C., G. Evans, P. I. Casares and W. M. C. Maxwell. 1994. Effect of monosaccharides and disaccharides in Trisbased diluents on motility, acrosome integrity and fertility of pellet frozen ram spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 36:113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(94)90058-2
  30. Morrier, A., F. Castonguay and J. L. Bailey. 2002. Glycerol addition and conservation of fresh and cryopreserved ram spermatozoa. Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 82:347-356. https://doi.org/10.4141/A01-045
  31. Purdy, P. H. 2006. A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Rumin. Res. 63:215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.015
  32. Sirat, M. P., A. K. Sinha, B. K. Singh and R. L. Prasad. 1996. Effect of cryoprotectants on release of various enzymes from buck spermatozoa during freezing. Theriogenol. 45:405-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00377-K
  33. SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT1 user's guide International. Version 8.02 TS level 02MO Cary NC: SAS Institute, USA
  34. Tuli, R. K. and W. Holtz. 1992. The effect of zwitterions buffers on the freezability of Boer goat semen. Theriogenol. 37:947-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90056-W
  35. Tuli, R. K. and W. Holtz. 1994. Effect of glycerolization procedure and removal of seminal plasma on post-thaw survival and GOT-release from Boer goat spermatozoa. Theriogenol. 42:547-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90692-C
  36. Watson, P. F. 1995. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post thawing function. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 7:871-891. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950871
  37. Weitze, K. F. 1977. Untersuchungen zur Tiefgefrierkonservierung von Kaninchensperma. Habil-Schr, Hannover, Tieraerztl. Hochschule.
  38. Yildiz, C., A. Kaya, M. Aksoy and T. Tekeli. 2000. Influence of sugar supplementation of the extender on motility, viability and acrosomal integrity of dog spermatozoa during freezing. Theriogenol. 54:579-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00373-3

Cited by

  1. A novel method to predict the glass transition of 70% glycerol aqueous solution vol.36, pp.13, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2010.499148
  2. ATPase isoform in sturgeon sperm cryopreservation vol.53, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13134
  3. The effect of supplementation of cryopreservation diluents with sugars on the post-thawing fertility of ram semen vol.96, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.010
  4. Effect of sunflower lecithin on Kalahari Red goat semen during cryopreservation vol.51, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2018-0003
  5. Influential Factors on Supercooling of Nineteen Fruits and Vegetables vol.22, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2018.22.4.321
  6. Optimization of Sperm Cryopreservation Protocol for Mediterranean Brown Trout: A Comparative Study of Non-Permeating Cryoprotectants and Thawing Rates In Vitro and In Vivo vol.9, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060304
  7. NT 5C1B and FH are closely associated with cryoprotectant tolerance in spermatozoa vol.8, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12653