DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Approximate Nonlinear Methods for Incremental Dynamic Analysis of Seismic Performance

내진성능의 증분동적해석을 위한 비선형 약산법의 비교 검토

  • 배경근 (동아대학교 건축공학과 대학원) ;
  • 유명화 (동아대학교 건축공학과 대학원) ;
  • 강병두 (거창전문대학 건축과) ;
  • 김재웅 (동아대학교 건축학부)
  • Published : 2008.02.29

Abstract

Seismic performance evaluation of structure requires an estimation of the structural performance in terms of displacement demand imposed by earthquakes on the structure. Incremental Dynamic Analysis(IDA) is a analysis method that has recently emerged to estimate structural performance under earthquakes. This method can obtained the entire range of structural performance from the linear elastic stage to yielding and finally collapse by subjecting the structure to increasing levels of ground acceleration. Most structures are expected to deform beyond the limit of linearly elastic behavior when subjected to strong ground motion. The nonlinear response history analysis(NRHA) among various nonlinear analysis methods is the most accurate to compute seismic performance of structures, but it is time-consuming and necessitate more efforts. The nonlinear approximate methods, which is more practical and reliable tools for predicting seismic behavior of structures, are extensively studied. The uncoupled modal response history analysis(UMRHA) is a method which can find the nonlinear reponse of the structures for ESDF from the pushover curve using NRHA or response spectrum. The direct spectrum analysis(DSA) is approximate nonlinear method to evaluate nonlinear response of structures, without iterative computations, given by the structural linear vibration period and yield strength from the pushover analysis. In this study, the practicality and the reliability of seismic performance of approximate nonlinear methods for incremental dynamic analysis of mixed building structures are to be compared.

구조물의 내진 성능 평가는 구조물에 가해진 지진력에 대한 변위요구와 같은 구조물의 성능 평가를 필요로 한다. 증분동적해석(IDA)은 지진하중에 대한구조물의 성능 평가를 위해 최근에 알려진 해석 방법이다. 이 방법은 구조물의 탄성 단계에서부터 항복, 파단에 이르기까지 지반가속도의 증가 수준에 따른 구조물의 전체 거동을 파악할 수 있는 방법이다. 대부분의 구조물들은 강한 지진을 받을 경우, 비선형 거동의 변형이 예상된다. 여러 가지 비선형해석법 가운데 구조물의 내진역량을 계산하기 위한 가장 정확한 방법은 비선형 시간이력해석(NRHA)이긴 하나 많은 시간과 노력이 요구되고 있다. 따라서 구조물의 비선형 거동을 보다 간편하게 예측하기 위한 정확하고 실용적인 비선형 약산해석법에 관한 연구들이 활발히 진행되고 있다. 비선형 모드중첩법(UMRHA)은 pushover곡선으로부터 구한 등가단자유도계를 비선형 시간이력해석 또는 응답스펙트럼을 이용하여 구조물의 비선형 응답을 구할 수 있는 방법이다. 직접스펙트럼해석법(DSA)은 pushover 해석으로부터 구조물의 선형 진동주기와 항복강도를 구한 다음, 반복계산 없이 비선형 응답을 직접 산정하는 약산법이다. 본 연구에서는 내진성능의 증분동적해석을 위한 비선형 약산법의 정확성과 신뢰성을 비교 검토한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., "Capacity-demanddiagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures : SDF systems," Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of Berkeley, Berkeley, 1999, 67pp
  2. Freeman, S. A., "Development and use of capacity spectrum method," Proceedings of 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, CD-ROM, Oakland, Calif, EERI, 1998
  3. Bommer, J. J. and Elnashai, A. S., "Displacement spectra for seismic design," J. Earthquake Engng, Vol. 3, 1999, pp. 1-32 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246999000028
  4. Applied Technology Council, "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings," Report ATC-40, 1996. 11, 319pp
  5. FEMA, "NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings," Report No. FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., May 1997, 439pp
  6. Fajfar, P., "Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 979-993 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1
  7. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M., "Consistent inelastic design spectra : strength and displacement," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 23, 1994, pp. 502-521
  8. Mehmet Inel, Bretz, E. M., Black, E. F., Aschheim, M. A., and Abrams, D. P., "USEE 2001: Utility software for earthquake engineering report and user's manual," Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Campaign, Urbana, Illinois, 2001. 10, 88pp
  9. Li, K. N., CANNY 99, 3-dimensional nonlinear static/dynamic structural analysis computer program-users manual, CANNY Structural Analysis, CANADA, program- users 2000, 215pp
  10. Chopra, "Dynamics of Structures" 3rd, pearson, 2006
  11. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings: Theory and preliminary evaluation," Report No. PEER-2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of Berkeley, Berkeley, 2001, 87pp
  12. Bertero, V.V, "Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments", Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, Pister, K.S (ed), Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs, Nj, pp. 211-215
  13. Vamvatisikos D, Cornell CA., "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, 2000, pp. 491-514 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  14. Sang Whan Han and Anil K. Chopra, "Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 35, 2006, pp. 1853-1873 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.605
  15. FEMA, "Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings-Technical resources," Report No. FEMA-307, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., 1998, 254pp
  16. Otani, S. and Matsumori, T., "Correlation of damage and analysis: Experience from the 1995 Kobe Earth- quake," Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Seoul, Korea, 1997. 8, pp. 841-856
  17. 강병두, 전대한, 김재웅, "입체 복합구조물의 하부골조 층수변화에 따른 비선형 거동특성", 한국지진공학회 논문집, 제6권, 제1호, 2002. 2, pp. 55-62