Journal of the Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회)
권호 표지

Priority Decision Making for Planning A Long-term Sustainable High-speed Rail Network using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory

지속가능한 고속철도망 계획을 위한 투자우선순위 선정에 관한 연구 : 다원-속성 효용이론을 이용하여

  • 박진경 (한국철도기술연구원 철도정책물류연구본부 교통계획연구팀) ;
  • 엄진기 (한국철도기술연구원 철도정책물류연구본부 교통계획연구팀) ;
  • 이준 (한국철도기술연구원 철도정책물류연구본부 교통계획연구팀)
  • Published : 2008.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the growing international consensus regarding sustainable development of transportation, the plan of transportation infrastructure needs to meet various requirements toward enhancing environmental conditions. Accordingly, the upcoming long-term plan of high-speed rail network has to be reflecting the sustainability of transportation systems. In this paper, we demonstrate an application of methodologies based on multi-attribute utility theory for determining priorities of sustainable high-speed rail investment. The proposed methodologies identify indicators for sustainable transportation systems such as economic, environmental, and social ones and then, evaluate priority for planning a long-term sustainable high-speed rail network by comparing the relative importance among indicators. This will help transportation agencies to prioritize high-speed rail investment toward sustainable transportation systems.

본 연구는 중장기적 고속철도망 계획을 위한 투자우선순위를 전통적인 평가기법에서 벗어나 지속가능 한 교통의 관점에서 이를 분석할 수 있는 방법론을 제안하고, 다원-개준 의사결정기법 중의 하나인 다원-속성 효용이론(MAUT)을 이용하여 이를 분석하였다. 지속가능 한 교통지표는 경제지표, 사회지표 및 환경지표로 구분하였으며, 지속가능 한 고속철도망 지수 분석 결과 경부와 호남 고속철도 이후에 건설되어야 할 우리나라의 고속철도망 노선축의 투자우선순위는 동서축, 남해축, 서해축 등의 순서로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부(1999), 국가기간교통망계획(2000-2019)
  2. 건설교통부(2006), 국가철도망 구축계획(2006-2015)
  3. 임강원(1997), 도시교통계획-이론과 모형
  4. 한국개발연구원(2004), 도로.철도 부문사업의 예비타당성 조사 표준지침 수정.보완 연구(제4판)
  5. 한국교통연구원(2007), 국가기간교통망 수정계획(안) 공청회
  6. Black, W. R. (2000), "Toward a Measure of Transport Sustainability", Proceedings of the 79th Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C
  7. Cantos, P. M. Gumbau-Albert and J. Maudos (2005), "Transport Infrastructures, Spillover Effects and Regional Growth: Evidence of the Spanich Case", Transport Reviews, Vol.25, pp.25-50 https://doi.org/10.1080/014416410001676852
  8. Chu, X. and S. E. Polzin (2000), "Timing Rule for Major Transportation Investments", Transportation, Vol.27, pp.201-219 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005235423898
  9. Fruente, A. (2004), "Second-Best Redistribution Through Public Investment: A Characterization, an Empirical Test and an Application to the Case of Spain", Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.34, pp.489-503 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2003.06.001
  10. Hayashi, H. and H. Morisugi (2000), "International Comparison of Background Concept and Methodology of Transportation Project Appraisal", Transport Policy, Vol.7, pp.73-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00015-9
  11. Jeon, C. M. and A. Amekudzi (2005), "Addressing Sustainability in Transportation System: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics", Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C
  12. Jeon, C. M., A. Amekudzi and R. A. Guensler (2007), "Evaluating Transportation System Sustainability: Atlanta Metropolitan Region", Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C
  13. Kennedy (2002), "A Comparison of the Sustainability of Public and Private Transportation System: Study of the Greater Toronto Area", Transportation, Vol.29, pp.459-493 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016302913909
  14. Litman, T. (2007), "Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning", Victoria Transport Policy Institute Paper 07-2706, Victoria, Canada
  15. Yoon, K. P. and C. L. Hwang (1995), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publication Inc
  16. Zietsman, J., R. R. Laurence and S. J. Kim (2006), "Transportation Corridor Decision-Making with Multi-Attribute Utility Theory", Int. J. Management and Decision Making, Vol.7, pp.254-266 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2006.009147