DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristocs of the Somatotypes of Korean Farmer

한국 남녀 농업인의 체형 특성

  • 백윤정 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소) ;
  • 이경숙 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소) ;
  • 황경숙 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소) ;
  • 김경란 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소) ;
  • 김효철 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소)
  • Published : 2008.03.31

Abstract

This study was to research the characteristics of the somatotype of Korean farmers. 836 Korean farmers(Male: 361 persons, Female: 475 persons) volunteered for this study. They volunteered from 9 different area such as Kumi, Damyang, Iksan, Injae, Chungju, Choongju, Haman, Whasung, and Whasoon. The reusults were as follows: 1. The subcutaneous body fat thickness were decreased as they aged(p<.05). 2. The thicker the subcutaneous body fat thickness of Korean farmer, the wider the circumference size by the Korean famer's physical parts(p<.05-p<.001). 3. There were no significant differences in the circumference size such as upper arm, chest, bust, waist, umbilical waist, hip, and calf between Korean farmers and Korean standard size. 4. Korean women farmer showed significantly differences in the upper arm circumference(p<.01), the chest circumference(p<.01), the bust circumference(p<.01), the waist circumference(p<.01), the umbilical waist circumference(p<.01), and the calf circumference(p<.05) from Korean women standard by ages. Especially, Korean women farmer had thicker the umbilical waist circumference(the 40's: 103.2mm, the 50's 52.3mm, the 60's 22.3mm, over 70's 22.1mm) than Korean women standard. 5. The 40's women farmer had thicker the upper arm circumference, the chest circumference, the bust circumference, the waist circumference, the umbilical waist circumference, and the calf circumference than Korean women standard. The 70's women farmer had skinner circumferences except the umbilical waist circumference than Korean women standard. 6. Korean farmers showed the crooked back shape, the broad-knee length and also front-bending knee shape as they aged.

Keywords

References

  1. 김수현, 이정란. (2003). 노년 남성의 체형분류에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회, 27(6), 624-634
  2. 김수현, 이정란. (2005). 노년 남성의 체형별 상의 치수체계. 한국의류학회, 29(1), 157-166
  3. 김인순. (2000). 노년 여성의 체형특징 및 유형화에 관한 연구. 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
  4. 김희숙. (2002). 의복원형설계를 위한 농촌지역 노년기 여성의 체형분류. 한국의류산업학회지, 4(5), 480-486
  5. 백윤정, 이경숙, 김경란. (2007). 한국 남녀 농업인의 체형특성. 한국의류학회 초록집, 31, 271-274
  6. 이선명. (1993). 의복구성을 위한 노년기 남성의 체형연구-상반신에 대하여. 한양여자대학교논문집, 16, 477-508
  7. 이소영, 김효축. (2004). 60대 노년 여성의 체간부 체형분류. 한국의류학회, 28(11), 1426-1437
  8. 이정임, 주소령, 남윤자, 류영실. (2004). 노년 여성의 표준신체치수 설정에 관한 연구(제2보)-체형분류와 표준신체치수-. 한국의류학회, 28(3/4), 377-386
  9. 최인순. (1995). 노년기 여성의 동체부 형태분석 및 인대제작에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
  10. 최인순, 남윤자. (1999). 노년 여성의 하반신 체형분류 및 특성. 복식문화연구, 7(1), 155-157
  11. 三吉滿智子. (2002). 복장조형학 이론편 I. 서울: 교학연구사
  12. 2006 고령자 통계. (2006, 10. 1). 통계청. 자료검색일 2007, 4. 10, 자료출처 http://www.nso.go.kr
  13. Anderson, S., Nilsson, B. E., Hessel, T., Noren, A., Saraste, M., & Rydholm, D. (1989). Degenerative joint disease in ballet dancers. Clin Orthop, 238, 233-236
  14. Anderson, J. A. D. (1984). Arthrosis and its realtion to work. Scand J. Work Health, 10, 429-433 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2301
  15. Allard, P., Nault, M. L., Hinse, S., LeBlanc, R., & Labelle, H. (2001). Relationship between morphologic somatotypes and standing posture equilibrium. Ann. Hum. Biol., 28(6), 624-633 https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460110047946
  16. Brenner, J. F., Casey, V. A., Dwyer. J. T., & Bailey, S. M. (1994). The measurement of body fat distribution using somatotype photographs and computer-assisted imaging techniques. Ann. Hum. Biology, 21(1), 23-38 https://doi.org/10.1080/03014469400003052
  17. Croft, P., Coggon, D., Cruddas, M., & Cooper, C. (1992). Osteoarthritis of the hip: An occupational disease in farmers. BMJ, 304, 1269-1272 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6837.1269
  18. Damon, A. & McFarland, R. A. (1995). The physique of bus and truck drivers, with a review of occupational anthropology. Am. J. Phys. Anthropo., 13, 711-742
  19. Felson, D. T., Anderson, J. J., Naimark, A., Walker, A. M., & Meenan, R. F. (1988). Obesity and knee osteoarthritis - The Framingham study. Ann. Intern. Med, 109(1), 18-24 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-109-1-18
  20. Guagnano, M. T., Ballone, E., Colagrande, V., Della Vecchia, R., Manigrasso, M. R., Merlitti, D., Riccioni, G., & Sensi, S. (2001) Large waist circumference and risk of hypertension. Int. J. Obes Rela Metab Disord, 25(9), 1360-1364 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801722
  21. Han R. S., Morrison C. E., & Lean, M. E. J. (1999). Age and health indications assessed by silhouette photographs. Eur. J. Clin. Nutri, 53, 606-611 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600816
  22. Hisao, H., Long, D., & Snyder, K. (2002). Anthropometric differences among occupational groups. Ergonomics, 45(2), 136-152 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110115372
  23. Kanehisa, H., Miyatani, M., Azuma, K., Kuno, S., & Fukunaga, T. (2004) Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol, 91(5-6), 534-537 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-1034-9
  24. Koleva, M., Nacheva, A., & Boev, M. (2002). Somatotype and disease prevalence in adults. Rev. Environ. Health, 17(1), 65-84 https://doi.org/10.1515/REVEH.2002.17.1.65
  25. Meszaros, J. & Mohasci, J. (1982). An anthropometric study of top level athletes in view of the changes that took place in the style of some ball games. Humabiologia Budapestinesis, 13, 15-20
  26. Singh, A. P. & Singh, S. P. (2006). Somatotypic variations: an analysis of some traditional occupations. J. Hum. Ecol., 19(4), 249-251 https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2006.11905886
  27. Stephnicka, J. (1986). Somatotype in relation to physical performance, sports and body posture. In Kinanthropometry. London: Reilly, Watkins & Borms
  28. Thelin, A., Jansson, B., Jacobsson, B., & Strom, H. (1997). Coxarthrosis and farm work: a case-referent study. Am. J. Ind. Med, 32, 497-501 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199711)32:5<497::AID-AJIM9>3.0.CO;2-P
  29. Vingard, E., Hogstedt, C., Alfredsson, L., Fellenius E., Goldie, I., & Koster, M. (1991). Coxarthrosis and physical work load. Scand J. Work Environ Health, 17, 104-109 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1727

Cited by

  1. Agricultural Labor Environment and Work Safety vol.35, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2016.35.4.205
  2. The Study on the Foot Type of Female Farmers vol.62, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7233/jksc.2012.62.1.076