한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

문헌정보학분야에서 메타분석 연구에 관한 고찰

A Review of the Meta-Analysis in Library and Information Science

  • 노정순 (한남대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과)
  • 발행 : 2008.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

메타분석(Meta-Analysis)이란 분석에 대한 분석(analysis of analysis)이란 의미로, 특정 연구문제에 대해 독립적으로 수행된 선행연구들의 일치하지 않은 결과들을 통합하여 결론을 내리기 위해 개개 연구의 분석결과들을 수학적으로 합성하여 통계적으로 결론을 내리는 방법이다. 본 연구는 메타분석의 특성과 기본원리, 분석 절차, 대표적인 분석모델을 소개하고, 문헌정보학분야에서의 메타분석연구를 고찰하였다. 다른 학문에 비해 문헌정보학에서 메타분석연구는 매우 소량 수행되었고 국내 문헌정보학분야에서는 전무한 상태이다. 문헌정보학에서 메타분석을 수행하는데 문제점과 메타분석연구를 활성화하기 위해 연구자가 보고서 작성시 유의해야 할 내용을 논의하였다.

Meta-analysis refers to the analysis of analysis. It is the statistical analysis of a large collection of analysis results from individual studies for the purpose of summarizing, integrating and interpreting the inconsistent findings. However, no meta-analysis study has been conducted in Library and Information Science in Korea. This Study introduced the characteristics, basic principles, analysis procesure, and major models of meta-analysis, reviewed meta-analysis studies in Library and Information Science, and discussed major problems in conducting meta-analysis in Library and Information Science especially in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 노정순. 2006. 국내외 문헌정보학분야 연구에서 추론통계 사용에 관한 연구. '한국문헌정보학회지', 40(1): 119-138
  2. 오성삼. 2002. '메타분석의 이론과 실제'. 서울: 건국대학교출판부
  3. Ankem, Kalyani. 2005. 'Approaches to meta- analysis: a guide for LIS researchers.' Libraryand Iinformation Science Research, 27(2): 164-176
  4. Ankem, Kalyani. 2006. 'Factors influencing information needs among cancer patients: a meta-analysis.' Libraryand Information Science Research, 28(1): 7-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.11.003
  5. Canepi, Kitti. 2007. 'Fund allocation formula analysis: determining elements for best practices in libraries.' Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 31: 12-24
  6. Chau, Patrick. 1999. 'On the Use of construct reliability in MIS research: a meta- analysis.' Information and Management, 35(4): 217-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00089-5
  7. Chen, Chaomei and R. Rada, 1996. 'Interacting with hypertext: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.' Human-Computer Interaction, 11(2): 125-156 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1102_2
  8. Chen, Chaomei and Yue Yu. 2000. 'Empirical studies of information visualization: a meta-analysis.' Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 53: 851-866 https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0422
  9. Cohen, Jacob. 1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press
  10. Field, Andy P. 2001. 'Meta-analysis of corre- lation coefficients: a Monte Carlo com- parision of fixed and random effects methods.' Psychological Methods, 6(2): 161-180 https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.161
  11. Field, Andy P. 2005. 'Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?' Psycho- logical Methods, 10(4): 444-467 https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.444
  12. Glass, Gene. 1976. 'Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research.' Educational Research, 5: 351-379
  13. Haug, James D. 1997. 'Physicians' preference for information sources: a meta-analytic study.' Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 85(3): 223-232
  14. Hedges, Larry V. 1981. 'Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators.' Journal of Educa- tional Statistics, 7: 119-137
  15. Hjorland, Birger. 2002. 'Meta-analysis should also be visible inside information science.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4): 324-324 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10070
  16. Hjorland, Birger. 2005. 'Why is meta analysis neglected by information scientists?' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13): 1193-1194 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1179
  17. Hunter, John E., Frank L. Schmidt, and Gregg B. Jackson. 1982. Meta-analysis: cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publi- cations
  18. Hunter, John E. and Frank L. Schmidt. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis: collection error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications
  19. Hunter, John E. and Frank L. Schmidt. 2004. Methods of meta-analysis: collection error and bias in research findings. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
  20. Hwang, Mark I. and Jerry W. Lin. 1999. 'Information dimension, information overload and decision quality.' Journal of Information Science, 25(3): 213-218
  21. King, William R. and Jun He. 2006. 'A meta- analysis of the technology acceptance model.' Information and Management, 43(6): 740-755 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
  22. Koufogiannakis, Denise and Natasha Wiebe. 2006. 'Effective methods for teaching information literacy skills to undergra- duate students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.' Evidence based library and information practice, 1(3): 3-43.
  23. Lai, Vincent S. and Radha K. Mahapatra. 1997. 'Exploring the research in infor- mation technology implementation.' Information and Management, 32(4): 187-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00022-0
  24. Lee, Gwanhoo and Weidong Xia. 2006. 'Orga- nizational size and IT innovation ado- ption: a meta-analysis.' Information and Management, 43(8): 975-985 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.09.003
  25. Lemeshow, Adina R., R. E. Blum, J. A. Berlin, M. A. Stoto, and G. Colditz. 2005. 'Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of abservational studies.' Journal of Cli- nical Epidemiology, 58: 867-873 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.004
  26. Li, Elden Y. 1997. 'Perceived importance of information system success factors: a meta analysis of group differences.' Information and Management, 32(1): 15-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00005-0
  27. Lipsey, Mark W. and David B. Wilson. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
  28. Mahmood, Mo A., Laura Hall, and Daniel L. Swanberg. 2001. 'Factors affecting information technology usage: a meta- analysis of the empirical literature.' Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11(2): 107- 130 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1102_02
  29. Mead, T. L. and D. T. Richards, 1995. 'Librarian participation in meta-analysis projects.' Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83(4): 461-464
  30. Martin, Jose, Victor Perez, Montse Sacristan, and Enric Alvarez. 2005. 'Is grey literature essential for a better control of publication bias in psychiatry? An example form three meta-analyses of schizophrenia.' European Psychiatry, 20: 550-553 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.03.011
  31. Olson, Hope A. and Rose Schlegl. 2001. 'Stan- dardization, objectivity, and user focus: a meta-analysis of subject access critiques.' Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 32(2): 61-80 https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v32n02_06
  32. Osburn, H. G. and John Callender. 1992. 'A Note on the sampling variance of the mean uncorrected correlation in meta- analysis and validity generalization.' Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2): 115-122 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.115
  33. Rosenthal, Robert. 1984. Meta-analytic pro- cedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications
  34. Rosenthal, Robert. 1991. Meta-analytic pro cedures for social research. 2nd ed. Newbery Park: SAGE Publications
  35. Saxton, Matthew L. 1997. 'Reference service evaluation and meta-analysis: findings and methodological issues.' The Library Quarterly, 67(3): 267-289 https://doi.org/10.1086/629952
  36. Saxton, Matthew L. 2006. 'Meta-analysis in Library and Information Science: me- thod, history, and recommendations for reporting research.' Library Trends, 55(1): 158-170 https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0052
  37. Schepers, Jeroen and Martin Wetzels. 2007. 'A Maeta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjec- tive norm and moderation effects.' Information and Management, 44: 90-103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
  38. Shelley, Mack C. II and John H. Schuh. 2001. 'Are the best higher education journals really the best? a meta-analysis of writing quality and readability.' Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 33(1): 11-23 https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.33.1.11
  39. Silver, N. Clayton and William P. Dunlap. 1987. 'Averaging correlation coefficients: should Fisher's Z trasformation be used?' Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1): 146-148 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.146
  40. Spoerri, Anselm. 2007 'Using the structure of overlap between search results to rank retrieval systems without relevance judgments.' Information Processing and Management, 43(4): 1059-1070 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.09.009
  41. Trahan, Eric. 1990. Comparing computerized and paper based information retrieval systems in library public services: a meta-analysis. MLS thesis. State University of New York at Albany
  42. Wantland, D. J., C. J. Portilla, W. L. Holzemer, R. Slaughter, and E. M. McGhee. 2004. 'The Effectiveness of web-based VS. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.' Journal of Internet Medical Research. 6(4). [cited 2008.1.7]
  43. White, Howard D. 2002. 'Library and information science(LIS) in aid of meta- analysis.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4): 323-323 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10069
  44. Winston, Mark D. 2007. 'Ethical leadership and ethical decision making: a meta- analysis of research related to ethics education.' Library and Information Science Research, 29(2): 230-251 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.002
  45. Wolf, Fredric M. 1986. Meta-analysis: quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hill, CA: SAGE Publications
  46. Zhang, Li, Erin M. Watson, and Laura Banfield. 2007. 'The Efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face- to-face instruction in academic libraries: a systematic review.' Journal of Aca- demic Librarianship, 33(4): 478-484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.006

피인용 문헌

  1. Bayesian Analysis of Dose-Effect Relationship of Cadmium for Benchmark Dose Evaluation vol.26, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2013.26.3.453