Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

Analyzing Science Teachers' Understandings about Scientific Argumentation in terms of Scientific Inquiry

  • Published : 2008.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate science teachers' understandings about scientific argumentation in the classroom. Seven structured interview protocols were developed, asking the definition of scientific inquiry, the differentiation between scientific inquiry and hands-on activity, the opportunity of student argumentation, explicit teaching strategies for scientific argumentation, the critical example of argumentation, the criteria of successful argumentation, and the barrier of developing argumentation. The results indicate that there are differences and similarities in understandings about scientific argumentation between two groups of middle school teachers and upper elementary. Basically, teachers at middle school define scientific inquiry as the opportunity of practicing reasoning skills through argumentation, while teachers at upper elementary define it as the more opportunities of practicing procedural skills through experiments rather than of developing argumentation. Teachers in both groups have implemented a teaching strategy called "Claim-Evidence Approach," for the purpose of providing students with more opportunities to develop arguments. Students' misconception, limited scientific knowledge and perception about inquiry as a cycle without the opportunity of using reasoning skills were considered as barriers for implementing authentic scientific inquiry in the classroom.

Keywords

References

  1. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experimental is when you try and see if it works: Middle school conception of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(special issue), 514-529 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110504
  2. Champagne, A. B., Kouba, V. L., & Hurley, M. (2000). Assessing inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 447-470). Washington, D.C.: Association for the Advancement of Science
  3. Dunbar, K., Klahr, D. (1989). Developmental differences in scientific discovery processes. In D. Klahr & Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 109-143). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  4. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  5. Flick, L.B, & Lederman, N.G. (2006). Scientific inquiry and nature of science: implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. The Netherlands: Springer
  6. Gallagher, J. J., & Tobin, K. (1987). Teacher management and student engagement in high school science. Science Education, 71(4), 535-555 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710406
  7. Lawson, A. E. (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 716-740 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20067
  8. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
  9. Southerland, S. A., Gess-Newsome, J., & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists' beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 669-691 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10104
  10. Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 668-690
  11. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Education Research, 62(2), 129-169 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062002129
  12. Krajcik, K., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial Attempts by middles students. The Journal of the Learning Science, 7 (3 & 4), 313-350 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0703&4_3
  13. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego: Academic Press, INC
  14. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implication for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
  15. Kuhn, D. (2007). Reasoning about multiple variables: Control of variables is not the only challenge. Science Education, 91, 710-726 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20214
  16. Mackenzie, A. H. (2001). The role of teacher stance when infusing inquiry questioning into middle school science classroom, School Science and Mathematics, 101(3), 143-153 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18017.x
  17. Maor, D., & Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 839-854 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320807
  18. Morrell, P. D., Flick, L. B., Park, Y-S., Perkins, C., & Schepige, A. (March, 2003). Reform Teaching Strategies Used by Student Teachers, A paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  19. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
  20. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
  21. Oliveira, A. W., & Sadler, T. D. (2007). Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, DOI 10.1002/tea.20211, 1-25
  22. Osborne, J., Erduran,. S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
  23. Pressley, M., Hogan, K., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta, J., & Ettenberger, S. (1996). The challenges of instructional scaffolding: The challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11(3), 138-146
  24. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' belief and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  25. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. Handbook of research on teacher education (2 nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA
  26. Roehrig, G., & Luft, J. (2001, March). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lesson. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO
  27. Wainwright, C. L., Flick, L. B., Morrell, P. (2003). Development of instruments for assessment of instructional practices in standards-based teaching. Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 6(1), 21-46