Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

THE INFLUENCE OF THE INITIAL STABILITY AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT INSTALLATION ON THE OSSEOINTEGRATION

임프란트 식립시 초기 안정성이 골유착에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Young-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Yeo-Gab (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Byung-Jun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 이영훈 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김여갑 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최병준 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2008.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The long-term experience of using osseointegrated implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous patients shows that high success rates can be predictably achieved. Primary implant stability has been identified to be a prerequisite to achieve osseointegration. In this study, we set up the amount of removed bone so that it differed on implant installation site for each group. The influence of each initial stability on secondary stability and osseointegration was compared with time lapse using resonance frequency analysis and histomorphometric analysis. Materials and methods: A total 27 US $II^{(R)}$ (Osstem, Korea) implants were placed in the mandibular edentulous area of 3 beagle dogs. The implant site was prepared by the conventional technique with drills, and three experimental groups were divided into under-drilling group, normal-drilling group and over-drilling group. The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured at intervals of immediately, 4, 8, 12 weeks after placement using $Osstell^{(R)}$ mentor RFA. After the animals were sacrificed, histomorphometric evaluation was executed for measuring BIC and BD. Results: 1) The under-drilled group showed most high ISQ value for whole experiment period. 2) Bone-to-implant-contact(BIC) showed the tendency to be increased gradually as the experiment period passed except the 8 weeks of the normal group. 3) The under-drilled group showed most high bone density(BD) level for whole experiment period, and it was expressed the aspect to be increased gradually according to an experiment period passage in the average of all group. 4) Resonance frequency analysis and histomorphometric analysis are presumed by generally proportional. Conclusions: As this research result, it seems that there are some correlation between resonance frequency analysis and histomorphometric analysis. As are accomplished osseointegration stably so that more superior at the region which the overpressure comes to add, it will be applicable method in clinical field.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Branemark P-I, Hansson HA et al : Osseointegrated titanium implants; Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52 : 155, 1981 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  2. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L : State of the art in oral implants. J Clin Periodontol 18 : 474, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x
  3. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P : Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 7 : 261, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  4. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, et al : Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implant Res 8 : 226, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  5. Meredith N, Rasmussen L, Sennerby L, et al : Mapping implant stability by resonance frequency analysis. Med Sci Research 24 : 191, 1996
  6. Friberg B, Jemt L, Lekholm U : Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6 : 142, 1991
  7. Farzad P, Andersson L, Gunnarsson S et al : Implant stability, tissue conditions, and patient self-evaluation after treatment with osseointegrated implants in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 6 : 24, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00024.x
  8. Meredith N : Assessment of implant stability as prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 491, 1998
  9. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B et al : Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28 : 266, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8
  10. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero JA et al : Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 11 : 12, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001012.x
  11. Glauser R, Meredith N : Diagnostische Moglichkeiten zur Evaluation der Implantatstabilitat. Implantolgie 9 : 147, 2001
  12. Black J :"push-out"Tests. J Biomed Mater Res(Editorial) 23 : 1243, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820231102
  13. Hearn TC, Shatzker J, Wolfson J : Extraction strength of cannulated cancellous bone screws. J Ortho Trauma 7 : 138, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199304000-00006
  14. Heller JG, Estes BT, Zaouali M et al : Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: Variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 : 1315, 1996 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199609000-00004
  15. Johansson CB, Sennerby L, Albrektsson T : A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6 : 437, 1991
  16. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T : Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2 : 69, 1987
  17. Schulte W : The Periotest - periodontal status. Zahnarztl Mitt 76 : 1409, 1986
  18. Schulte W : Occlusal-periodontal loading is now quantitatively measurable: a new use of Periotest procegures. Zahnarztl Mitt 78 : 474, 1988
  19. Olive J, Aparicio C : The Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 390, 1990
  20. Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P et al : Periotest: An objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6 : 55, 1995
  21. Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Faulkner G et al : Assessment of the Periotest device in base line mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10 : 221, 1995
  22. van Steenberghe D, Tricio J, Naert I et al : Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant intersurfaces: A clinical study with the Periotest device. Clin Oral Implants Res 6 : 31, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060104.x
  23. Caulier H, Naert I, Kalk W et al : The relationship of some histologic parameters, radiographic evaluations, and Periotest measurements of oral implants: an experimental animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12 : 380, 1997
  24. Meredith N, Friberg B, Sennerby L et al : Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 269, 1998
  25. Johansson P, Strid KG : Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9 : 279, 1994
  26. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J et al : Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 6 : 213, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060403.x
  27. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J et al : Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro study in pig ribs. Clin Oral Impl Res 6 : 164, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060305.x
  28. Sennerby L, Meredith N : Resonance frequency analysis analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent 19 : 493, 1998
  29. Burri C, Wolter D : The compressed autogenous spongiosis graft. Traumatology 80 : 169, 1977
  30. Osborn JF : Generation of anatomically shaped pressed autologous cancellous bone for reconstruction of continuity defects. Deutsche Zeitschrift Mund-Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie 4 : 46, 1980
  31. Spiessl B : A new method of anatomical reconstruction of extensive defects of the mandible with autogenous cancellous bone. J Maxillofac Surg 8 : 78, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(80)80078-6
  32. Nkenke E, Kloss F, Wiltfang J et al : Histomorphometric and flurescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotomie technique. Clin Oral Impl Res 13 : 595, 2002
  33. B?chter A, Kleinheinz J, Wiesmann HP et al : Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Impl Res 16 : 1, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01081.x
  34. Sennerby L, Meredith N : Resonance frequency analysis - current knowledge and clinical implications. Osteointegrazione e carico immediato 20: 19, 2002
  35. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Grondahl K et al : On cutting torque measurements during implant placement: a 3-year clinical prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1 : 75, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00095.x
  36. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA : Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 517, 1998
  37. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP et al : Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Prat I: 8-year Life Table Analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 8 : 161, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  38. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Brugenakte C et al : The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 13 : 144, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  39. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B : A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Surg 10 : 387, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  40. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T et al : A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3 : 129, 1988
  41. Zarb GA, Schmitt A : The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. the Toronto study. Part I: surgical results. J Prosthetic Dent 63 : 451, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90237-7
  42. Lekholm U, Zarb GA : Patient selection and preparation, 3rd ed. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing, 1990, p.164
  43. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U et al : A long-term follow- up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the totally edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 347, 1990
  44. Jemt T : Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prosthesis supported by Br?nemark implants in edentulous jaws. A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6 : 270, 1991
  45. Jaffin RA, Berman CL : The excessive loss of Br?nemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 62 : 2, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  46. Becker W, Sennerby L, Bedrossian E et al : Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial. J Periodontol 76 : 391, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.391
  47. Chavez H, Ortman LF, DeFranco RL et al : Assessment of oral implant mobility. J Prosthet Dent 70 : 421, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90078-3
  48. In-ho C : Clinical Application of Resonance Frequency Annalysis on Implant Restoration. J Kor Dent Assoc 41 : 148, 2003
  49. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D et al : The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 8 : 234, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  50. Sennerby L, Friberg B, Linden B et al : A comparison of implant stability in mandibular and maxillary bone using RFA. ABSTRACT presented at the Resonance Frequency Analysis Symposium. Gothenburg, Sweden. July 6, 2000
  51. Balleri P, Cozzolino A, Ghelli L et al : Stability measurements of osseointegrated implants using Osstell in partially edentulous jaws after 1 year of loading: a pilot study. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 4 : 128, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00162.x
  52. Glauser R, Ree A, Lundgren A et al : Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: a prospective, 1-year study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 3 : 204, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00142.x
  53. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S et al : Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 529, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x
  54. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S et al : Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 520, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01059.x
  55. Park CJ, Kim YS, Kim CW et al : A study on the change of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 41 : 271, 2003
  56. Summers RB : A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent 15 : 152, 1994
  57. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D et al : A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 6 : 48, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00027.x
  58. Veis AA, Trisi P, Papadimitriou S et al : Osseointegration of Osseotite and machined titanium implants in autogenous bone graft. A histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 54, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01004.x
  59. Cabrini RL, Guglielmotti MB, Almagro JC : Hist-omorphometry of initial bone healing around zirconium implants in rats. Implant Dent 2 : 264, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199312000-00008
  60. Barzilay I, Graser GN, Iranpour B et al : Immediate implantation of pure titanium implants into extraction sockets of Macaca fasciculris. Part II: Histologic observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 : 489, 1996
  61. Schultes G, Gaggl A : Histologic evaluation of immediate versus delayed placement of implants after tooth extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92 : 17, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.115464
  62. Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K et al : Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 14 : 601, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00937.x