Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지

Analysis of Relative Efficiency of Government Funded Research Institutes Using DEA Model

DEA 모형을 이용한 정부출연연구기관의 상대적 효율성 분석

  • Nam, In-Suk (Korean Agency for Technology and Standards) ;
  • Song, Yun-Young (Chonbuk National University, Dept. of Industrial and Information Systems Eng.) ;
  • Jeong, Byung-Ho (Chonbuk National University, Dept. of Industrial and Information Systems Eng.)
  • 남인석 (기술표준원) ;
  • 송윤영 (전북대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 정병호 (전북대학교 산업정보시스템공학과)
  • Published : 2008.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The enormous budget of government and manpower are invested to the government funded institutes every year. The R&D investment focused on input has to be turned toward the investment based on the effectiveness of R&D activities. Measuring the efficiency of research activities is required in order to evaluate the effectiveness of R&D investment in these institutes. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the relative efficiency of research activities performed in 19 government funded research institutes. CCR/BCC model and DEA/AR model were applied to get the relative efficiency of 19 institutes. Assurance regions for the weight of output attributes were obtained by using the underlined concept of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We used input and output data items describing research activity of 19 government funded research institutes. The results of this study are expected to become a basis of the R&D investment decision of the government.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성희, 정병호, 김재경; 의사결정분석 및 응용, 영지문화사, 1999
  2. 전용수, 최태성, 김성호; 효율성평가를 위한 자료 포락분석, 인하대학교출판부, 2002
  3. 조근태, 조용곤, 강현수; 앞서가는 리더들의 계층 분석적 의사결정, 동현, 2003
  4. 권철신, 박준호, 홍석기; '상호영향성 R&D과제군 의평가선정을 위한 CIDEAR 모형의 개발', 한국경영과학회지, 29(3)：41-61, 2004
  5. 김권위, 이혜영, 박해육; 'DEA/AHP모형을 통한 행정조직의 상대적 효율성 평가', 한국지방정부학회지, 8(4)：303-321, 2005
  6. 임호순, 유석천, 김연성; '연구개발사업의 평가 및 선정을 위한 DEA/AHP통합모형에 관한 연구', 한국경영과학회지, 24(4)：1-12, 1999
  7. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., and Tone, K.; Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Massachusetts, 2002
  8. Banker, R. D., Chrnes, A., and Cooper, W. W.; 'Some models for estimation technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,' Management Science, 30(9)：1078-1092, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  9. [9] Charnes, A., Copper, W. W., and Rhodes, E.; 'Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,' European J. of Oper. Res., 2(6)：429-444, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  10. Talluri S., Yoon, K. P.; 'A cone-ratio DEA approach for ATM justification,' Int. J. Production Economics, 66：119-129, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00123-1
  11. Thomas L. Satty; The analytic hierarchy process, Mc-Graw-Hill, Inc. 1980
  12. Thompson, R. G., Singleton, F. D., Jr., R. M. Thrall and Smith, B. A.; 'Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas,' Interfaces, 16：35-49, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.6.35
  13. Thompson R. G., Dharmapala, P. S., and Thrall, R. M.; 'Linked-cone DEA profit ratio and technical efficiency with application to Illinois coal mines,' Int. J. Production Economics 39：99-115, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(94)00064-H