DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Torsional Strength and Failure Modes of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Pure Torsion

순수비틀림을 받는 철근콘크리트 보의 비틀림 강도와 파괴모드

  • Lee, Jung-Yoon (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Woo (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hyun (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 이정윤 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김상우 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김지현 (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2008.08.31

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an analytical and experimental study on the performance of reinforced concrete beams subjected to pure torsion. The main parameters of the experimental tests were amount of torsional reinforcement and the ratio of the transverse torsional reinforcement to the longitudinal torsional reinforcement. The test results indicated that the maximum amount of torsional reinforcement required in ACI 318-05 code underestimated almost twice as much as the observed maximum amount of torsional reinforcement. Comparisons between the tested and calculated torsional behaviors of the 102 beams showed that the torsional failure modes of ACI 318-05 code disagreed with the observed failure modes. In addition, the torsion provisions in ACI 318-05 code overestimate the torsional strength of the RC beams in which relatively large amount of torsional reinforcement were reinforced, while underestimate for the beams with small amount of torsional reinforcement. This discrepancy between the theoretical ultimate torsional strength as given by the ACI 318-05 code and the experimental one can be due to neglecting the tension stiffening effect and the contribution of the torsional strength by concrete.

이 논문에서는 순수비틀림을 받는 철근콘크리트 보의 비틀림 성능에 관한 해석적 실험적 연구 결과를 나타내었다. 주요 실험변수는 비틀림 보강근의 양과 비틀림 각도 즉, 종방향 비틀림 보강근에 대한 횡방향 비틀림 보강근의 비이다. 실험에 의하면 ACI 318-05 기준식은 최대 비틀림 보강근의 양을 약 2배 과소평가하였다. 비틀림 보강근이 항복한 후에 파괴하는 102개 철근콘크리트 보의 실험 결과와 비교한 결과, ACI 318-05 기준식은 파괴모드가 변화하는 구간에서 비틀림 파괴모드를 정확하게 예측하지 못하였다. 또한, ACI 318-05 비틀림 기준식은 비틀림 보강근량이 상대적으로 많이 보강된 철근콘크리트 보의 경우 비틀림 강도를 과대평가하는 반면, 비틀림 보강근량이 작은 경우에는 실제 비틀림모멘트를 과소평가하였다. 실험 결과와 ACI 318-05 기준식 사이의 이러한 불일치는 기준식에서 비틀림 보강근의 인장증강효과와 콘크리트의 비틀림 강도에 대한 기여를 무시하고 있기 때문으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hsu, T. T. C., "Torsion of Structural Concrete- Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Members," Torsion of Structural Concrete, SP-18, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1968, pp. 261-306
  2. MacGregor, J. G. and Ghoneim, M. G., "Design for Torsion," ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 92, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1995, pp. 211-218
  3. Fang, I. K. and Shiau, J. K., "Torsional Behavior of Normaland High-Strength Concrete Beams," ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 101, No. 3, May-Jun. 2004, pp. 304-313
  4. PCI Committee, PCI Design Handbook-6th Edition, PCI, Farmington, 2004, pp. 4-57-65
  5. Zia, P. and Hsu, T. T. C., "Design for Torsion and Shear in Prestressed Concrete Flexural Members," PCI Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, May-Jun. 2004, pp. 34-42
  6. Eurocode 2, "Design of Concrete Structures," Eurocode 2, 1992, 227 pp
  7. JSCE, Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures-2002, Japan Society of Civil Engineering, 2002, 257 pp
  8. ACI Committee 318-05, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary (ACT 318-05 / ACI 318R-05), American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 2005, 436 pp
  9. Rahal, K. N. and Collins, M. P., "Simple Model for Predicting Torsional Strength of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Sections," ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 93. No. 6, 1996, pp. 658-666
  10. McMullen, A. E. and Rangan, V., "Pure Torsion in Rectangular Sections - A Re-Examination," ACI Journal, Proceedings, Vol. 75, No. 10, 1978, pp. 511-519
  11. Rasmussen, L. J. and Baker, G., "Torsion in Reinforced Normal and High-Strength Concrete Beams-Part 1: Experimental Test Series," ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 92. No. 1, 1995, pp. 56-62