DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development the Technique for Fabrication of the Thermal Fatigue Crack to Enhance the Reliability of Structural Component in NPPs

원자력 구조재 신뢰성 향상을 위한 열피로 균열 시험편 제작 기법 개발

  • Kim, Yong (Center for Robot & Manufacturing, Institute for Advanced Engineering) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Sung (School of Aerospace and Mechanical Eng. Korea Aerospace Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Bo-Young (School of Aerospace and Mechanical Eng. Korea Aerospace Univ.)
  • 김용 (고등기술연구원 로봇생산기술센터) ;
  • 김재성 (한국항공대학교 항공우주 및 기계공학부) ;
  • 이보영 (한국항공대학교 항공우주 및 기계공학부)
  • Published : 2008.04.30

Abstract

Fatigue cracks due to thermal stratification or corrosion in pipelines of nuclear power plants can cause serious problems on reactor cooling system. Therefore, the development of an integrated technology including fabrication of standard specimens and their practical usage is needed to enhance the reliability of nondestructive testing. The test material was austenitic STS 304, which is used as pipelines in the Reactor Coolant System of a nuclear power plants. The best condition for fabrication of thermal fatigue cracks at the notch plate was selected using the thermal stress analysis of ANSYS. The specimen was installed from the tensile tester and underwent continuos tension loads of 51,000N. Then, after the specimen was heated to $450^{\circ}C$ for 1 minute using HF induction heater, it was cooled to $20^{\circ}C$ in 1 minute using a mixture of dry ice and water. The initial crack was generated at 17,000 cycles, 560 hours later (1cycle/2min.) and the depth of the thermal fatigue crack reached about 40% of the thickness of the specimen at 22,000 cycles. As a results of optical microscope and SEM analysis, it is confirmed that fabricated thermal fatigue cracks have the same characteristics as real fatigue cracks in nuclear power plants. The crack shape and size were identified.

Keywords

References

  1. Syavash Ensha : Handbook of Case Histories in Failure Analysis(1st Edition), ASM vol.2, 363-367
  2. D. H. Hur, M. S. Choi, D. H. Lee and J. H. Han, Journal of the Korean Society for Nondestructive Testing., 20-5 (2000), 451-456 (in Korean)
  3. S. H. Kang, J. H. Lee, S. W. Choi and B. Y. Lee, Key Engineering Materials, 270-273 (2004), 390- 395 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.270-273.390
  4. Klaus W. Bieniussa and Hans Reck, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 190 (1999), 239 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00007-2
  5. Y. J. Yu and S. H. Park, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 178 (1997), 211-218 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00224-0
  6. M. Guyette and M. De Smet, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 153 (1995), 183-190 https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)00826-K
  7. C. S. Oh, International Journal of Fatigue, 34 (2001), 241-247
  8. A. Fissolo, B. Marini, G. Nais, and P. Wident, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 233-237 (1996), 156-161 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(96)00122-5
  9. M. Hayashi, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 184 (1998), 135-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00372-5
  10. A. Srivastava, V. Joshi and R. Shivpuri, Wear, 256 (2004), 38-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00281-3
  11. J. Sjostrom, and J. Bergstrom, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 153-154 (2004), 1089-1096
  12. T. Tokiyoshi, F. Kawashima, T. Igari and H. Kino, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 81 (2001), 837-845
  13. B. B. Kerezsi, A. G. Kotousov and W. H. Price, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 77 (2000), 425-434 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(00)00025-9
  14. G. Czuck, C. Mattheck, D. Munz and H. Stamm, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 84 (1985), 189-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(85)90189-X
  15. R. Shivpuri, Y. L. chu, K. Venkatesan, J. R. Conrad, K. Sridharan, M. Shamim and R. P. Fetherston, Wear, 192 (1996), 49-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06749-3