Comparison of Different Work/Rest Schedules of a Repetitive Upper-limb Task Based on Perceived Discomfort and Heart Rate

지각불편도와 심박수를 이용한 상지 반복 작업 작업/휴식 일정의 작업부하 비교

  • Lee, In-Seok (Department of Safety Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Haslam, Roger (Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University) ;
  • Song, Young-W. (Department of Industrial Health, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 이인석 (한경대학교 안전공학과) ;
  • ;
  • 송영금 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과)
  • Published : 2008.10.31

Abstract

Many automobile assembly workers often do several cycles of tasks continuously, i.e., without breaks, to get a longer break. This is not recommended since the dose of fatigue increases exponetially with time and it takes much longer time to recover. In this study, a laboratory experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of work/rest schedules on workload of a repetitive upper-limb task. Eleven male subjects participated in the experiment, in which simulated screw driving tasks were carried out repetitively with 3 different work/rest schedules: standard breaks(1 cycle of work at a time, 60 20-s breaks), medium breaks(5 cycles of work at a time, 12 100-s breaks), and long breaks(10 cycles of work at a time, 6 200-s breaks). The result showed that medium- and long-breaks schedules significantly increased the level of perceived discomfort and %HRR as compared to the standard-break schedule. The subjects' preference was not statistically different among work/rest schedules, which might be caused from the absolutely low level of workload of the experimental tasks. From the results, it is recommended to have frequent and shorter breaks rather than infrequent and longer breaks to decrease the level of physical workload. A more expanded studies, however, should be carried out to provide more practical safety guidelines on the work practice of continuous working without breaks among automobile assembly workers.

Keywords

References

  1. B.W. Niebel and A. Freivalds, "Methods, standards, and work design", McGraw-Hill, 1999
  2. J. R. Wilson and N. Corlett, "Evaluation of human work"(3rd ed.), CRC, 2005
  3. P.O. Astrand, K. Rodahl, H.A. Dahl, S.B. Stromme, "Textbook of work physiology"(4th ed.), Human Kinetics, 2003
  4. S. Konz, "Work/rest: Part I - Guidelines for the practitioner", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 22, pp. 67-71, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00068-1
  5. V. Putz-Anderson, "Cumulative trauma disorders: A manual for musculoskeletal diseases of the upper limbs", Taylor & Francis, London, 1988
  6. A. Kilbom, "Repetitive work of the upper extremity: Part II - The scientific basis(knowledge base) for the guide", Internationl Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 14, pp. 59-86, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)90006-X
  7. H. Christensen, K. Sogaard, M. Pilegaard, H.B. Olsen, "The importance of the work/rest pattern as a risk factor in repetitive monotonous work", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 25, pp. 367-373, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00025-6
  8. Y.C. Kim, J.P. Lee, "The Effects of Short Break Time and Mouse Clicks on the VDT Work by using Subjective Discomfort", J. of the KOSOS, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 30-36, 2008
  9. G. Borg, "Borg's Perceived exertion and pain scales", Human Kinetics, 1998
  10. R.A. Robergs and R. Landwehr, "The surprising history of the "HRmax=220-age" Equation", Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002
  11. O. Inbar, A. Oten, M. Scheinowitz, A. Rotstein, R. Dlin, and R. Casaburi, "Normal cardiopulmonary agerelated changes", Journal of Applied Phyiology, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 799-804, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1982.53.4.799
  12. S. Konz, "Work/rest: Part II - The scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 22, pp. 73-99, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00069-3